Cho Yoon Soo, Seo Cheong Hoon, Joo So Young, Ohn Suk Hoon
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, 94-200 Yeongdeungpo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07247, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 Beon-gil Dongan-gu Anyang Gyeonggi-do 14068, Republic of Korea.
Burns Trauma. 2020 Jun 19;8:tkaa018. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa018. eCollection 2020.
Patients with burns present with different clinical features depending on the types of burn injury and burn patients with lower levels of vitamin D have worse prognoses and more complications. The study aims to investigate the association between vitamin D levels and burn factors according to each burn type in relation to early intensive rehabilitation therapy initiated for inpatients with burns.
In this retrospective study, we enrolled 757 of 1716 inpatients who underwent rehabilitative therapy between May 2013 and April 2017. Burn types were divided into flame burn, electrical burn and other burns, including scalding, contact and chemical burns. Age, burned body surface area (BSA), wound healing time (WHT), length of hospital stay (LOS) and body mass index were analysed between vitamin D deficient and non-deficient patient groups using Student's -tests, or Mann-Whitney U test and among three burn types using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. The relationship between vitamin D levels and burn factors was evaluated using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient tests, and multiple linear regression analysis in different burn groups.
In total, 88.9% patients were vitamin D deficient, and these patients had a larger burned BSA ( = 0.015) and longer WHT and LOS (all < 0.001) than non-deficient patients. Burned BSA, WHT and vitamin D levels showed significant differences in their mean values according to three burn types (all < 0.001). WHT was a communal factor significantly associated with vitamin D levels in all three burn types < 0.05). The WHT cut-off points to predict vitamin D deficiency were 55 days for flame burn ( < 0.001) and 62.5 days for electrical burn ( = 0.001).
WHT across all three burn types was a common factor associated with vitamin D levels for inpatients with burns who had undergone rehabilitative therapy. Electrical burn patients with vitamin D deficiency, even those with a low burned BSA percentage, showed prolonged wound healing over a two-month post-burn period. Independent of burned BSA, nutritional intervention concerning vitamin D in relation to burn wound healing should be considered to guide early initiation of intensive rehabilitation therapy.
烧伤患者因烧伤类型不同而具有不同的临床特征,维生素D水平较低的烧伤患者预后较差且并发症更多。本研究旨在根据烧伤类型,调查烧伤住院患者早期强化康复治疗中维生素D水平与烧伤因素之间的关联。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了2013年5月至2017年4月期间接受康复治疗的1716名住院患者中的757名。烧伤类型分为火焰烧伤、电烧伤和其他烧伤,包括烫伤、接触性烧伤和化学烧伤。在维生素D缺乏和非缺乏患者组之间,使用学生t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验分析年龄、烧伤体表面积(BSA)、伤口愈合时间(WHT)、住院时间(LOS)和体重指数;在三种烧伤类型之间,使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)或克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯单因素方差分析。使用Pearson或Spearman相关系数检验以及不同烧伤组的多元线性回归分析,评估维生素D水平与烧伤因素之间的关系。
总体而言,88.9%的患者维生素D缺乏,这些患者的烧伤BSA更大(P = 0.015),WHT和LOS更长(均P < 0.001),高于非缺乏患者。根据三种烧伤类型,烧伤BSA、WHT和维生素D水平的平均值存在显著差异(均P < 0.001)。WHT是所有三种烧伤类型中与维生素D水平显著相关的共同因素(均P < 0.05)。预测维生素D缺乏的WHT临界点,火焰烧伤为55天(P < 0.001),电烧伤为62.5天(P = 0.001)。
对于接受康复治疗的烧伤住院患者,所有三种烧伤类型的WHT都是与维生素D水平相关的共同因素。维生素D缺乏的电烧伤患者,即使烧伤BSA百分比低,在烧伤后两个月内伤口愈合时间也会延长。应考虑在不依赖烧伤BSA的情况下,针对烧伤伤口愈合进行维生素D的营养干预,以指导早期强化康复治疗的启动。