• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国使用先进疗法的特应性皮炎患者的成本与治疗模式:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析

Costs and Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Using Advanced Therapies in the United States: Analysis of a Retrospective Claims Database.

作者信息

Eichenfield Lawrence F, DiBonaventura Marco, Xenakis Jason, Lafeuille Marie-Helene, Duh Mei Sheng, Fakih Iman, Levenberg Mark, Cappelleri Joseph C, Sikirica Vanja

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Pediatrics, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Aug;10(4):791-806. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00413-8. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1007/s13555-020-00413-8
PMID:32607738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7367964/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For many, atopic dermatitis (AD) is not adequately controlled with topical regimens. This analysis examined treatment using advanced therapies and associated costs.

METHODS

The IQVIA Health Plan Claims data set was analyzed. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with AD who newly initiated advanced therapy after the availability of dupilumab (March 28, 2017) and had ≥ 6 months continuous enrollment before and after their first advanced therapy claim (index date) were included. Advanced therapies included dupilumab, systemic corticosteroids (SCSs), systemic immunosuppressants (SISs), and phototherapy. A multivariate regression model was used to predict annualized follow-up healthcare costs.

RESULTS

In total, 1980 patients were included (61.1% female; mean age, 41.2 years [SD, 17.4]; 11.3% < 18 years). Pre-index date, 65.2% of patients used topical corticosteroids (TCSs; 40.7% and 32.1% used medium and high potency, respectively). The most common advanced therapy was SCSs (N = 1453 [73.4%]; 69.2% prednisone) followed by dupilumab (N = 265 [13.4%]), SISs (N = 99 [5.0%]; 47.5% methotrexate), and phototherapy (N = 163 [8.2%]). Of patients treated with dupilumab, SISs, and phototherapy, 17.4%, 26.3%, and 14.1%, respectively, were prescribed SCSs post-index date. Overall, 62.6% of patients initiating SCSs, 49.1% initiating dupilumab, 64.6% initiating SISs, and 36.2% initiating phototherapy were prescribed TCSs post-index date. Mean annualized total costs (SD) post-index date were $20,722 ($47,014): $11,196 ($41,549) in medical costs ($7973 [$35,133] in outpatient visit costs) and $9526 ($21,612) in pharmacy costs. Mean annualized total cost (SD) varied significantly (P < 0.05) by index treatment: dupilumab, $36,505 ($14,028); SCSs, $17,924 ($49,019); SISs, $24,762 ($47,583); phototherapy, and $17,549 ($57,238).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to combination therapy with SCSs and TCSs was common within 6 months of initiating advanced therapy in patients with AD. Patients also incurred significant pharmacy and outpatient costs. These results highlight the difficulty of managing AD with these existing treatment options.

摘要

引言

对于许多人来说,外用治疗方案无法充分控制特应性皮炎(AD)。本分析研究了使用先进疗法的治疗情况及相关费用。

方法

对IQVIA健康计划索赔数据集进行分析。纳入年龄≥12岁、在度普利尤单抗上市(2017年3月28日)后新开始先进疗法且在首次先进疗法索赔(索引日期)前后连续参保≥6个月的AD患者。先进疗法包括度普利尤单抗、全身性皮质类固醇(SCSs)、全身性免疫抑制剂(SISs)和光疗。使用多变量回归模型预测年化随访医疗费用。

结果

共纳入1980例患者(61.1%为女性;平均年龄41.2岁[标准差17.4];11.3%<18岁)。在索引日期前,65.2%的患者使用外用皮质类固醇(TCSs;分别有40.7%和32.1%使用中效和高效的)。最常见的先进疗法是SCSs(N = 1453[73.4%];69.2%为泼尼松),其次是度普利尤单抗(N = 265[13.4%])、SISs(N = 99[5.0%];47.5%为甲氨蝶呤)和光疗(N = 163[8.2%])。在接受度普利尤单抗、SISs和光疗的患者中,分别有17.4%、26.3%和14.1%在索引日期后开具了SCSs。总体而言,在索引日期后,开始使用SCSs的患者中有62.6%、开始使用度普利尤单抗的患者中有49.1%、开始使用SISs的患者中有64.6%以及开始使用光疗的患者中有36.2%开具了TCSs。索引日期后的年化总费用均值(标准差)为20,722美元(47,014美元):医疗费用为11,196美元(41,549美元)(门诊就诊费用为7973美元[35,133美元]),药房费用为9526美元(21,612美元)。年化总费用均值(标准差)因索引治疗而异(P<0.05):度普利尤单抗为36,505美元(14,028美元);SCSs为17,9,24美元(49,019美元);SISs为24,762美元(47,583美元);光疗为17,549美元(,57,238美元)。

结论

在AD患者开始先进疗法的6个月内,转为SCSs和TCSs联合治疗很常见。患者还产生了大量的药房和门诊费用。这些结果凸显了使用这些现有治疗方案管理AD的困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/30a4bebded02/13555_2020_413_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/2c8f408d4a5f/13555_2020_413_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/5b691b795e37/13555_2020_413_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/7ebd6ea62fb6/13555_2020_413_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/c9496d87b544/13555_2020_413_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/30a4bebded02/13555_2020_413_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/2c8f408d4a5f/13555_2020_413_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/5b691b795e37/13555_2020_413_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/7ebd6ea62fb6/13555_2020_413_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/c9496d87b544/13555_2020_413_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2d/7367964/30a4bebded02/13555_2020_413_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Costs and Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Using Advanced Therapies in the United States: Analysis of a Retrospective Claims Database.美国使用先进疗法的特应性皮炎患者的成本与治疗模式:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Aug;10(4):791-806. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00413-8. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using German Health Claims Data.特应性皮炎患者的治疗模式与医疗资源利用:一项使用德国健康保险数据的回顾性队列研究
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Aug;12(8):1925-1945. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00773-3. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
3
Real-World Effectiveness of Newly Initiated Systemic Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in the United States: A Claims Database Analysis.美国新启动的特应性皮炎系统治疗的真实世界疗效:一项理赔数据库分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Sep;39(9):4157-4168. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02197-z. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Patients with Severe and/or Difficult-to-Treat Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 JADE COMPARE Trial.阿泊替尼治疗重度和/或难治性特应性皮炎患者的疗效和安全性:随机 3 期 JADE COMPARE 试验的事后分析。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Jul;24(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00785-5. Epub 2023 May 22.
5
Administrative claims analysis of utilization and costs of care in health plan members with atopic dermatitis who had prior use of a topical corticosteroid and who initiate therapy with pimecrolimus or tacrolimus.对曾使用过外用皮质类固醇且开始使用吡美莫司或他克莫司治疗的特应性皮炎健康计划成员的医疗利用情况和费用进行行政索赔分析。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 May;13(4):349-59. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.4.349.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of baricitinib versus dupilumab for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: an Italian healthcare system perspective.巴瑞替尼与度普利尤单抗治疗中度至重度特应性皮炎的成本效益分析:意大利医疗保健系统视角
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1155-1166. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2255495. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
Successful Combination of Systemic Agents for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis Resistant to Dupilumab Therapy.成功联合全身用药物治疗对度普利尤单抗治疗抵抗的特应性皮炎。
Dermatology. 2021;237(4):535-541. doi: 10.1159/000512890. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Predictors of nonresponse to dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: A machine learning analysis.特应性皮炎患者对度普利尤单抗无应答的预测因素:机器学习分析。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Sep;129(3):354-359.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.05.025. Epub 2022 May 28.
9
Real-world persistence with dupilumab among adults with atopic dermatitis.真实世界中成人特应性皮炎患者使用度普利尤单抗的持续性。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Jan;126(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.07.026. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
10
Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.度普利尤单抗联合外用皮质类固醇治疗中重度特应性皮炎的长期管理(LIBERTY AD CHRONOS):一项为期 1 年、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2287-2303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31191-1. Epub 2017 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The real-world burden of atopic dermatitis: MEASURE-AD results from Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina.特应性皮炎的真实世界负担:来自巴西、墨西哥和阿根廷的MEASURE-AD研究结果。
An Bras Dermatol. 2025 May-Jun;100(3):470-486. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2024.05.011. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
The therapeutic effect of 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-3-acetyl-rac-glycerol on chemically induced atopic dermatitis.1-棕榈酰基-2-亚油酰基-3-乙酰基-rac-甘油三酯对化学诱导特应性皮炎的治疗作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):23402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73951-2.
3
Are Antimicrobial Peptides a 21st-Century Solution for Atopic Dermatitis?

本文引用的文献

1
Dupilumab Versus Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Adults: Indirect Comparison Using the Eczema Area and Severity Index.度普利尤单抗与环孢素治疗成人中重度特应性皮炎:基于湿疹面积及严重程度指数的间接比较
Acta Derm Venereol. 2019 Sep 1;99(10):851-857. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3219.
2
Treatment-resistant atopic dermatitis: challenges and solutions.难治性特应性皮炎:挑战与解决方案
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019 Mar 21;12:181-192. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S163814. eCollection 2019.
3
Association of atopic dermatitis with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
抗菌肽是否为特应性皮炎的 21 世纪解决方案?
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Aug 30;24(17):13460. doi: 10.3390/ijms241713460.
4
Treatment Patterns among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis in Secondary Care: A National, Observational, Non-interventional, Retrospective Study in Sweden.在二级护理中患有特应性皮炎的患者的治疗模式:瑞典一项全国性、观察性、非干预性、回顾性研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2022 Sep 6;102:adv00774. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v102.1986.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A network meta-analysis.阿巴西普、巴瑞替尼和乌帕替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Sep;35(9):e15636. doi: 10.1111/dth.15636. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
Economic Burden and Healthcare Resource Use of Alopecia Areata in an Insured Population in the USA.美国参保人群中斑秃的经济负担及医疗资源利用情况
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Apr;12(4):1027-1040. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00710-4. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
Prescription Market Share and Treatment Patterns in Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Observational Study Using US Insurance Claims.特应性皮炎的处方市场份额和治疗模式:一项使用美国保险索赔数据的回顾性观察研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):2052-2064. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02071-y. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Potential of Tamanu () Oil for Atopic Dermatitis Treatment.山竹子()油治疗特应性皮炎的潜力。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Dec 26;2021:6332867. doi: 10.1155/2021/6332867. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.中重度特应性皮炎系统治疗药物的疗效和安全性比较:系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Sep;35(9):1797-1810. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17351. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
10
Alternative Immunomodulatory and Disease-Modifying Treatment for Atopic Dermatitis: Autologous Total Immunoglobulin G.特应性皮炎的替代免疫调节和疾病改善治疗:自体全免疫球蛋白G
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2020 Nov;12(6):903-905. doi: 10.4168/aair.2020.12.6.903.
特应性皮炎与儿童和成人的抑郁、焦虑和自杀意念的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Sep;79(3):448-456.e30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.017.
4
Dupilumab: A review of its use in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.度普利尤单抗:治疗特应性皮炎的研究进展。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Mar;78(3 Suppl 1):S28-S36. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.022.
5
Atopic dermatitis yardstick: Practical recommendations for an evolving therapeutic landscape.特应性皮炎评估工具:不断发展的治疗领域的实用建议。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Jan;120(1):10-22.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.10.039.
6
Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among Adults with Atopic Dermatitis in the United States: A Claims-Based Analysis.美国特应性皮炎成人患者的医疗资源利用与成本:基于理赔数据的分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1342-1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in the United States: Analysis of Healthcare Claims Data in the Commercial, Medicare, and Medi-Cal Databases.美国特应性皮炎负担:商业、医疗保险和医疗救助数据库中的医疗保健理赔数据分析
Adv Ther. 2017 Aug;34(8):1989-2006. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0582-z. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
The Burden of Atopic Dermatitis: Summary of a Report for the National Eczema Association.特应性皮炎的负担:美国国家湿疹协会报告摘要
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Jan;137(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies.特应性皮炎管理指南:第 2 节。特应性皮炎的局部治疗管理和治疗。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jul;71(1):116-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents.特应性皮炎管理指南:第 3 节。光疗和全身药物治疗与管理。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):327-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.030. Epub 2014 May 9.