Suppr超能文献

过程1模拟是否会产生驱动过程2决策的认知感受?

Do Process-1 simulations generate the epistemic feelings that drive Process-2 decision making?

作者信息

Fields Chris, Glazebrook James F

机构信息

, Caunes Minervois, France.

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eastern Illinois University, 600 Lincoln Ave., Charleston, IL, 61920-3099, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2020 Nov;21(4):533-553. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00981-9. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Abstract

We apply previously developed Chu space and Channel Theory methods, focusing on the construction of Cone-Cocone Diagrams (CCCDs), to study the role of epistemic feelings, particularly feelings of confidence, in dual process models of problem solving. We specifically consider "Bayesian brain" models of probabilistic inference within a global neuronal workspace architecture. We develop a formal representation of Process-1 problem solving in which a solution is reached if and only if a CCCD is completed. We show that in this representation, Process-2 problem solving can be represented as multiply iterated Process-1 problem solving and has the same formal solution conditions. We then model the generation of explicit, reportable subjective probabilities from implicit, experienced confidence as a simulation-based, reverse engineering process and show that this process can also be modeled as a CCCD construction.

摘要

我们应用先前开发的楚空间和通道理论方法,重点关注锥-余锥图(CCCDs)的构建,以研究认知感受,特别是信心感受,在问题解决的双过程模型中的作用。我们特别考虑了全局神经元工作空间架构内概率推理的“贝叶斯大脑”模型。我们开发了一种对过程1问题解决的形式化表示,其中当且仅当一个CCCD完成时才会得出解决方案。我们表明,在这种表示中,过程2问题解决可以表示为多次迭代的过程1问题解决,并且具有相同的形式化解决条件。然后,我们将从隐式的、体验到的信心生成明确的、可报告的主观概率建模为一个基于模拟的逆向工程过程,并表明这个过程也可以建模为CCCD构建。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验