Bray Jeremy K, McMichael Amy J, Huang William W, Feldman Steven R
Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Dermatol Online J. 2020 Mar 15;26(3):13030/qt094243gp.
The population of the U.S. is becoming more diverse every year. The field of dermatology is not following the same trend.
To assess the promotion of diversity in the field of dermatology by analyzing publications focused on diversity, compared to other specialties.
The PubMed database was systematically searched to identify publications focused on diversity from January 2008 to July 2019. The search criteria were as follows: dermatology/radiology/ophthalmology/ anesthesiology/orthopedic surgery/family medicine/ internal medicine/general surgery AND diversity/ diverse/racial/race/ethnic/ethnicity/cultural/culture/competency/competence. Comparisons were made using single-factor ANOVA and two-group t-tests. A qualitative analysis was performed for publications in the field of dermatology.
From January 2016 to July 2019, there were 25 publications focused on diversity in dermatology (Mean=6.25, SD=2.06), compared to 6 in radiology (Mean=1.50, SD=1.29, P=0.01), two in ophthalmology (Mean=0.50, SD=0.58, P=0.01), two in anesthesiology (Mean=0.50, SD=1.00, P=0.01), 12 in orthopedic surgery (Mean=3.00, SD=1.41, P=0.04), 23 in family medicine (Mean=5.75, SD=2.22, P=0.75), 9 in internal medicine (Mean=2.25, SD=1.71, P=0.02), and 7 in general surgery (Mean=1.75, SD=0.50, P=0.02).
Although the field of dermatology has suffered from a lack of racial/ethnic diversity, efforts to promote diversity via increased publications in the last four years have been stronger in dermatology compared to many other fields.
美国人口每年都变得更加多样化。皮肤科领域却未呈现相同趋势。
通过分析与其他专科相比专注于多样性的出版物,评估皮肤科领域对多样性的促进情况。
系统检索PubMed数据库,以识别2008年1月至2019年7月专注于多样性的出版物。检索标准如下:皮肤科/放射科/眼科/麻醉科/骨科手术/家庭医学/内科/普通外科以及多样性/多样的/种族的/种族/民族的/民族/文化的/文化/能力/胜任能力。使用单因素方差分析和两组t检验进行比较。对皮肤科领域的出版物进行定性分析。
2016年1月至2019年7月,有25篇专注于皮肤科多样性的出版物(均值=6.25,标准差=2.06),相比之下,放射科有6篇(均值=1.50,标准差=1.29,P=0.01),眼科有2篇(均值=0.50,标准差=0.58,P=0.01),麻醉科有2篇(均值=0.50,标准差=1.00,P=0.01),骨科手术有12篇(均值=3.00,标准差=1.41,P=0.04),家庭医学有23篇(均值=5.75,标准差=2.22,P=0.75),内科有9篇(均值=2.25,标准差=1.71,P=0.02),普通外科有7篇(均值=1.75,标准差=0.50,P=0.02)。
尽管皮肤科领域存在种族/民族多样性不足的问题,但与许多其他领域相比,皮肤科在过去四年中通过增加出版物来促进多样性的努力更为强劲。