Wilson Britney N, Sun Mary, Ashbaugh Alyssa Gwen, Ohri Simran, Yeh Christopher, Murrell Dedee F, Murase Jenny E
School of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2021 Apr 20;7(4):391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.04.001. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Previous reports have revealed inadequate resident education and textbook representation of dermatological conditions in patients with skin of color (SoC). This suggests that the literature and continuing medical education are important alternative dermatology educational resources to aid in diagnosing and treating patients of color.
This study develops criteria to assess and examine the prevalence of SoC-related publications among top dermatology journals.
We developed the first-ever prespecified criteria that allow for the assessment of diversity in the dermatologic literature. The archives of 52 dermatology journals from January 2018 to October 2020, selected based on Scopus ranking, were analyzed for journal characteristics and content regarding skin and hair of color, diversity and inclusion, and socioeconomic/health care disparities that affect underrepresented populations with SoC.
Our study reveals that the average percentage of overall publications relevant to SoC is quite low. The percent of SoC articles ranged from 2.04% to 16.8% with a mean of 16.3%. The top-performing dermatology journals in SoC were, not surprisingly, from countries with populations with SoC; however, the , and were among the top 10. Research and higher-impact journals were among the lowest in SoC rankings, including the , and , and had <5% of articles on SoC.
We believe that the criteria we established could be used by journal editors to include at least 16.8% of SoC-relevant articles in each issue. Increasing SoC content in the dermatological literature, and particularly in high-impact journals, will serve as an invaluable educational resource and aid in promoting excellence in the care of patients with SoC.
先前的报告显示,针对有色人种皮肤(SoC)患者的皮肤科疾病,住院医师教育以及教科书呈现均存在不足。这表明,文献和继续医学教育是重要的替代性皮肤科教育资源,有助于诊断和治疗有色人种患者。
本研究制定标准,以评估和审查顶级皮肤科期刊中与SoC相关的出版物的流行情况。
我们制定了首个预先确定的标准,用于评估皮肤科文献的多样性。分析了基于Scopus排名选出的2018年1月至2020年10月期间52种皮肤科期刊的存档,以了解有关有色人种皮肤和头发、多样性与包容性以及影响代表性不足的SoC人群的社会经济/医疗保健差异的期刊特征和内容。
我们的研究表明,与SoC相关的总体出版物的平均百分比相当低。SoC文章的百分比范围为2.04%至16.8%,平均为16.3%。毫不奇怪,在SoC方面表现最佳的皮肤科期刊来自有色人种人口较多的国家;然而,[具体期刊名称1]、[具体期刊名称2]和[具体期刊名称3]也跻身前十。研究型和影响力较高的期刊在SoC排名中处于最低水平,包括[具体期刊名称4]、[具体期刊名称5]和[具体期刊名称6],关于SoC的文章不到5%。
我们认为,我们建立的标准可被期刊编辑用于在每期期刊中纳入至少16.8%与SoC相关的文章。增加皮肤科文献中,尤其是高影响力期刊中的SoC内容,将成为宝贵的教育资源,并有助于促进对SoC患者的优质护理。