• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格特质与美国的反黑偏见直接相关。

Personality traits are directly associated with anti-black prejudice in the United States.

机构信息

Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235436. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0235436
PMID:32609765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7329088/
Abstract

Modern psychological theories postulate that individual differences in prejudice are determined by social and ideological attitudes instead of personality. For example, the dual-process motivational (DPM) model argues that personality does not directly associate with prejudice when controlling for the attitudinal variables that capture the authoritarian-conservatism motivation and the dominance motivation. Previous studies testing the DPM model largely relied on convenience samples and/or European samples, and have produced inconsistent results. Here we examined the extent to which anti-black prejudice was associated with the Big Five personality traits and social and ideological attitudes (authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, political party affiliation) in two large probability samples of the general population (N1 = 3,132; N2 = 2,483) from the American National Election Studies (ANES). We performed structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the causal assumptions between the latent variables and used survey weights to generate estimates that were representative of the population. Different from prior theories, across both datasets we found that two personality traits, agreeableness and conscientiousness, were directly associated with anti-black prejudice when controlling for authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and political party affiliation. We also found that a substantial part of the associations between personality traits and anti-black prejudice were mediated through those social and ideological attitudes, which might serve as candidates for prejudice-reduction interventions in the real world.

摘要

现代心理学理论假设,偏见的个体差异是由社会和意识形态态度决定的,而不是由个性决定的。例如,双过程动机(DPM)模型认为,在控制捕获威权保守主义动机和支配动机的态度变量时,个性与偏见没有直接关联。之前测试 DPM 模型的研究主要依赖于方便样本和/或欧洲样本,并且产生了不一致的结果。在这里,我们在来自美国全国选举研究(ANES)的两个大型概率总体样本(N1=3132;N2=2483)中,考察了反黑偏见与大五人格特质以及社会和意识形态态度(威权主义、社会支配取向、政党归属)之间的关联程度。我们进行了结构方程建模(SEM)来测试潜在变量之间的因果假设,并使用调查权重生成具有代表性的人口估计值。与先前的理论不同,在两个数据集上,我们发现,在控制威权主义、社会支配取向和政党归属后,两个人格特质,宜人性和尽责性,与反黑偏见直接相关。我们还发现,人格特质与反黑偏见之间的大部分关联都是通过这些社会和意识形态态度来介导的,这些态度可能是现实世界中减少偏见干预措施的候选者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d8/7329088/444effbd39f3/pone.0235436.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d8/7329088/f428606f6eb8/pone.0235436.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d8/7329088/444effbd39f3/pone.0235436.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d8/7329088/f428606f6eb8/pone.0235436.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d8/7329088/444effbd39f3/pone.0235436.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Personality traits are directly associated with anti-black prejudice in the United States.人格特质与美国的反黑偏见直接相关。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235436. eCollection 2020.
2
Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual-process motivational model.人格、意识形态、偏见和政治:一种双重加工动机模型。
J Pers. 2010 Dec;78(6):1861-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
3
The balanced ideological antipathy model: explaining the effects of ideological attitudes on inter-group antipathy across the political spectrum.平衡的意识形态反感模型:解释意识形态态度对整个政治光谱上群体间反感的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Dec;41(12):1607-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167215603713. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
4
Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model.大五人格、社会世界观和意识形态态度:双过程认知动机模型的进一步检验。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;149(5):545-61. doi: 10.1080/00224540903232308.
5
Is empathy one of the Big Three? Identifying its role in a dual-process model of ideology and blatant and subtle prejudice.同理心是否是“三巨头”之一?在双重过程模型中识别它在意识形态和明显及微妙偏见中的作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195470. eCollection 2018.
6
The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model.意识形态与偏见的心理基础:对双加工模型的检验
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jul;83(1):75-93.
7
Individual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: evidence from peer-report data.个体在意识形态态度和偏见上的差异:来自同伴报告数据的证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Aug;103(2):343-61. doi: 10.1037/a0028706. Epub 2012 May 28.
8
The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: a longitudinal test during a global recession.双重思想与偏见模型:全球经济衰退期间的纵向测试。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul-Aug;153(4):448-66. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.757544.
9
Differential effects of intergroup contact for authoritarians and social dominators: a dual process model perspective.群体间接触对权威主义者和社会支配论者的差异化影响:双过程模型视角。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Apr;38(4):477-90. doi: 10.1177/0146167211429747. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
10
The personality bases of ideology: a one-year longitudinal study.意识形态的人格基础:一项为期一年的纵向研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;150(5):540-59. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365364.

本文引用的文献

1
Who Is Prejudiced, and Toward Whom? The Big Five Traits and Generalized Prejudice.谁有偏见,以及针对谁?五大特质与泛化偏见。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Oct;45(10):1455-1467. doi: 10.1177/0146167219832335. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Resting-state functional brain connectivity best predicts the personality dimension of openness to experience.静息态功能脑连接性最能预测经验开放性这一人格维度。
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Jul 5;1. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.8.
3
The Political Self: How Identity Aligns Preferences With Epistemic Needs.政治自我:身份如何将偏好与认知需求对齐。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jun;29(6):901-913. doi: 10.1177/0956797617748679. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
4
Do Student Samples Provide an Accurate Estimate of the General Public?学生样本能否准确估计普通大众的情况?
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0168354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168354. eCollection 2016.
5
Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity.功能连接组指纹识别:利用脑连接模式识别个体。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Nov;18(11):1664-71. doi: 10.1038/nn.4135. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
6
Weight bias as a function of person variables and contact experiences.体重偏见作为个人变量和接触经历的函数。
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Jul-Aug;156(4):351-68. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1095708. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
7
Political attitudes develop independently of personality traits.政治态度的形成独立于人格特质。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 3;10(3):e0118106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118106. eCollection 2015.
8
The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping.偏见与刻板印象的神经科学。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Oct;15(10):670-82. doi: 10.1038/nrn3800. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
9
Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.不受约束的党派人士:美国政治极化与公众舆论趋势
AJS. 2008 Jan 28;114(2):408-446. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1010098.
10
The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: a longitudinal test during a global recession.双重思想与偏见模型:全球经济衰退期间的纵向测试。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul-Aug;153(4):448-66. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.757544.