• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿呼吸窘迫时鼻高频振荡通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气的比较:一项交叉临床试验。

Nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure in newborn infants respiratory distress: A cross over clinical trial.

作者信息

Renesme Laurent, Dumas de la Roque Eric, Germain Christine, Chevrier Agnès, Rebola Muriel, Cramaregeas Sophie, Benard Antoine, Elleau Christophe, Tandonnet Olivier

机构信息

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Pôle de Santé Publique, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Oct;55(10):2617-2623. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24935. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1002/ppul.24935
PMID:32609946
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation (nHFPV) to manage neonatal respiratory distress decreases the regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO ) compared to nasal continous positive airway pressure (nCPAP).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, monocentric, open-label, noninferiority crossover trial. Newborns of gestational age (GA) ≥ 33 weeks exhibiting persistent respiratory distress after 10 minutes of life were treated with nHFPV and nCPAP, in succession and in random order. The primary endpoint was the mean rScO , as revealed by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

RESULTS

Forty-nine newborns were randomized; the mean GA and birth weight was 36.4 ± 1.9 weeks and 2718 ± 497 g. The mean rScO difference during the last 5 minutes of each ventilation mode (nHFPV minus nCPAP) was -0.7 ± 5.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.25; 0.95%).

CONCLUSION

In our study on newborns of GA ≥33 weeks treated for respiratory distress, cerebral oxygenation via nHFPV was not inferior to nCPAP.

摘要

目的

确定与经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)相比,采用经鼻高频振荡通气(nHFPV)治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫是否会降低局部脑氧饱和度(rScO₂)。

研究设计

一项前瞻性、随机、单中心、开放标签、非劣效性交叉试验。对胎龄(GA)≥33周、出生后10分钟仍有持续性呼吸窘迫的新生儿,依次随机采用nHFPV和nCPAP进行治疗。主要终点是近红外光谱(NIRS)显示的平均rScO₂。

结果

49例新生儿被随机分组;平均GA和出生体重分别为36.4±1.9周和2718±497g。每种通气模式最后5分钟期间的平均rScO₂差值(nHFPV减去nCPAP)为-0.7±5.4%(95%置信区间(CI)-2.25;0.95%)。

结论

在我们对GA≥33周、因呼吸窘迫接受治疗的新生儿的研究中,nHFPV对脑氧合的效果不劣于nCPAP。

相似文献

1
Nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure in newborn infants respiratory distress: A cross over clinical trial.新生儿呼吸窘迫时鼻高频振荡通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气的比较:一项交叉临床试验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Oct;55(10):2617-2623. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24935. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Nasal high frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in transient tachypnea of the newborn: a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT00556738).新生儿短暂性呼吸急促中鼻高频振荡通气与鼻持续气道正压通气的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验(NCT00556738)
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Mar;46(3):218-23. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21354. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
3
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高流量鼻导管与经鼻持续气道正压通气用于呼吸窘迫早产儿的初始呼吸支持:一项随机对照试验
Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Preterm Infants with Moderate Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.经鼻高频振荡通气治疗早产儿中-重度呼吸窘迫综合征的多中心随机临床试验。
Neonatology. 2021;118(3):325-331. doi: 10.1159/000515226. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
5
[Application of three kinds of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial].[三种无创正压通气作为呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿主要通气模式的应用:一项随机对照试验]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;52(1):34-40.
6
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.经表面活性物质治疗的早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(胎龄<30 周)行鼻间歇正压通气:一项随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
7
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)与双水平经鼻 CPAP 治疗呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 Mar;95(2):F85-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.169219. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
8
Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO removal: A randomized controlled crossover trial.高频鼻振荡通气和 CO 去除:一项随机对照交叉试验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018 Sep;53(9):1245-1251. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24120. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
9
Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.比较经鼻间歇正压通气和经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果。
J Trop Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;65(4):352-360. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmy058.
10
[Clinical effect of bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure in respiratory support for preterm infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome].[气泡式鼻塞持续气道正压通气与传统鼻塞持续气道正压通气对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿呼吸支持的临床效果]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jun;20(6):433-437. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.06.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress.新生儿呼吸窘迫的无创高频通气。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD012712. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012712.pub2.
2
Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric and Neonatal Patients.儿科和新生儿患者的机械通气
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 17;12:805620. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.805620. eCollection 2021.