• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高龄 (>80 岁)急性缺血性脑卒中患者使用阿替普酶溶栓治疗的疗效:汇总个体患者数据的分析。

Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Aged >80 Years: Pooled Analyses of Individual Patient Data.

机构信息

ADB Building, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany and Hochschule Biberach, University of Applied Sciences, Germany (E.B.).

The Medical Department, Boehringer Ingelheim France SAS, Reims (T.D.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2322-2331. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028396. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028396
PMID:32611284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7382542/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Expert guidelines specify no upper age limit for alteplase for thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) but, until recently, European regulatory criteria restricted its use to patients aged 18 to 80 years. We performed pooled analyses of randomized controlled trial (RCT) and registry data to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of alteplase for AIS among patients aged >80 years to support a regulatory application to lift the upper age restriction.

METHODS

Individual patient data were evaluated from 7 randomized trials of alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) versus placebo or open control for AIS, and the European SITS-UTMOST registry database. Clinical outcomes, including good functional outcome (score 0-1, modified Rankin Scale day 90 or Oxford Handicap Score day 180), were evaluated in the full RCT and registry populations, and specified age-based subgroups (≤80 or >80 years) who met existing European regulatory criteria for alteplase, excluding upper age restriction.

RESULTS

Regardless of treatment allocation, 90-day mortality was lower among RCT patients aged ≤80 versus >80 years who otherwise met existing European regulatory criteria (246/2405 [10.2%] versus 307/1028 [29.9%], respectively). Among patients aged >80 years, alteplase versus placebo was associated with a higher proportion of good stroke outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1; 99/518 [19.1%] versus 67/510 [13.1%]; =0.0109) and similar 90-day mortality (153/518 [29.5%] versus 154/510 [30.2%]; =0.8382). The odds of a good stroke outcome following alteplase allocation in the full RCT population were independent of age (=0.7383). Good stroke outcome was reported for almost half (4821/11 169 [43.2%]) of the patients who received alteplase in routine practice. Outcomes in routine practice supported those achieved in RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Alteplase for AIS has a positive benefit-risk profile among patients aged >80 years when administered according to other regulatory criteria. Alteplase for AIS should be evaluated on an individual benefit-risk basis.

摘要

背景/目的:专家指南规定,阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)没有年龄上限,但直到最近,欧洲监管标准仍将其使用限制在 18 至 80 岁的患者。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)和登记研究的数据进行了汇总分析,以评估阿替普酶治疗年龄>80 岁的 AIS 患者的获益-风险特征,以支持解除年龄上限的监管申请。

方法

从 7 项阿替普酶(0.9mg/kg)与安慰剂或开放对照治疗 AIS 的随机试验和欧洲 SITS-UTMOST 登记数据库中评估了个体患者数据。在 RCT 和登记人群中评估了临床结局,包括良好的功能结局(90 天改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-1 分或 180 天牛津残疾评分),并在符合现有欧洲阿替普酶监管标准的特定年龄亚组(≤80 岁或>80 岁)中进行了评估,排除了年龄上限。

结果

无论治疗分配如何,符合现有欧洲监管标准但年龄>80 岁的 RCT 患者 90 天死亡率低于年龄≤80 岁的患者(246/2405[10.2%]与 307/1028[29.9%])。在年龄>80 岁的患者中,阿替普酶与安慰剂相比,良好的卒中结局(改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-1 分)的比例更高(99/518[19.1%]与 67/510[13.1%];=0.0109),90 天死亡率相似(153/518[29.5%]与 154/510[30.2%];=0.8382)。在 RCT 全人群中,阿替普酶治疗后良好的卒中结局与年龄无关(=0.7383)。在常规实践中,接受阿替普酶治疗的患者中,几乎有一半(4821/11169[43.2%])报告了良好的卒中结局。常规实践中的结局支持 RCT 中的结局。

结论

在符合其他监管标准的情况下,阿替普酶治疗年龄>80 岁的 AIS 患者具有良好的获益-风险特征。阿替普酶治疗 AIS 应根据个体获益-风险进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5058/7382542/b76805fd1aa2/str-51-2322-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5058/7382542/3c035e900fef/str-51-2322-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5058/7382542/d322dc3ddb83/str-51-2322-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5058/7382542/b76805fd1aa2/str-51-2322-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5058/7382542/3c035e900fef/str-51-2322-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5058/7382542/d322dc3ddb83/str-51-2322-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5058/7382542/b76805fd1aa2/str-51-2322-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Aged >80 Years: Pooled Analyses of Individual Patient Data.高龄 (>80 岁)急性缺血性脑卒中患者使用阿替普酶溶栓治疗的疗效:汇总个体患者数据的分析。
Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2322-2331. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028396. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Secondary Analysis of the ENCHANTED Randomized Clinical Trial.急性缺血性卒中患者低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶治疗:ENCHANTED随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1328-1335. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2286.
3
Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.治疗延迟、年龄及卒中严重程度对阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中疗效的影响:来自随机试验的个体患者数据的荟萃分析
Lancet. 2014 Nov 29;384(9958):1929-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
4
Utilization of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Reasons for Nonuse in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯急性缺血性卒中患者静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的使用情况及未使用原因
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 May;29(5):104761. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104761. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Brain Imaging Signs and Health-Related Quality of Life after Acute Ischemic Stroke: Analysis of ENCHANTED Alteplase Dose Arm.急性缺血性脑卒中后脑影像学表现与健康相关生活质量:ENCHANTED 阿替普酶剂量组分析。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(4):427-436. doi: 10.1159/000509226. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
Interaction of Blood Pressure Lowering and Alteplase Dose in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study.降压与阿替普酶剂量在急性缺血性脑卒中的相互作用:强化高血压控制与溶栓治疗脑卒中研究的结果。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;48(3-6):207-216. doi: 10.1159/000504745. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
7
Lipid-Lowering Pretreatment and Outcome Following Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study Trial.急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓治疗前降脂治疗与预后:高血压强化控制与溶栓治疗卒中研究试验的事后分析
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(5-6):213-220. doi: 10.1159/000488911. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke with alteplase in an Asian population: results of the multicenter, multinational Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Non-European Union World (SITS-NEW).亚洲人群中使用阿替普酶进行急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗:卒中溶栓安全实施-非欧盟世界多中心、多国研究(SITS-NEW)的结果
Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9 Suppl A100:93-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00895.x. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
9
Low body temperature does not compromise the treatment effect of alteplase.低体温不会影响阿替普酶的治疗效果。
Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2618-21. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.611210. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
10
Even Faster Door-to-Alteplase Times and Associated Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke.更快的急性缺血性脑卒中患者门到溶栓时间及相关结局
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Dec;28(12):104329. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104329. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Sep;15(9):e70791. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70791.
2
Barriers to Early Hospital Presentation in Acute Stroke: Findings from a Cohort Study.急性卒中早期入院的障碍:一项队列研究的结果
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2025 Jul 1;28(4):554-559. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_225_25. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
3
Utilization of DWI-FLAIR Mismatch for Intravenous Thrombolysis in an Elderly Patient With Stroke.

本文引用的文献

1
Distribution and evolution of acute interventional ischemic stroke treatment in Germany from 2010 to 2016.2010年至2016年德国急性介入性缺血性中风治疗的分布与演变
Neurol Res Pract. 2019 Feb 28;1:4. doi: 10.1186/s42466-019-0010-8. eCollection 2019.
2
Consensus statements and recommendations from the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update Conference, Stockholm 11-13 November 2018.2018年11月11日至13日于斯德哥尔摩举行的欧洲卒中组织-卡罗林斯卡卒中最新进展会议的共识声明与建议
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Dec;4(4):307-317. doi: 10.1177/2396987319863606. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
3
Professional guideline versus product label selection for treatment with IV thrombolysis: An analysis from SITS registry.
扩散加权成像-液体衰减反转恢复序列不匹配在老年卒中患者静脉溶栓中的应用
Neurohospitalist. 2025 May 13:19418744251343999. doi: 10.1177/19418744251343999.
4
Efficacy of Intravenous Thrombolysis for the Prognosis of Branch Atheromatous Disease.静脉溶栓对分支动脉粥样硬化疾病预后的疗效
Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81301. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81301. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Off-label thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients: Frequencies and outcome compared to on-label and no treatment.急性缺血性卒中患者的超说明书溶栓治疗:与说明书规定治疗及未治疗相比的频率和结局
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Apr 11:23969873251329875. doi: 10.1177/23969873251329875.
6
A methodological assessment of randomization integrity in alteplase for acute ischemic stroke individual patient data meta-analyses.急性缺血性卒中个体患者数据荟萃分析中阿替普酶随机化完整性的方法学评估
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 19;20(3):e0315342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315342. eCollection 2025.
7
Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke: a study on intravenous thrombolysis in patients over 80 years of age with acute ischaemic stroke.卒中治疗的安全实施:一项针对80岁以上急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓的研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):e087454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087454.
8
Risk prediction model for poor prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis among ischemic stroke patients aged ≥ 80 years and analysis of follow-up.≥80岁缺血性中风患者静脉溶栓后预后不良的风险预测模型及随访分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):1354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84912-0.
9
Outcomes in elderly patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy in association with premorbid Rankin Scale scores.老年患者血管内血栓切除术的预后与病前Rankin量表评分的关系。
Front Neurol. 2024 Jul 3;15:1418415. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1418415. eCollection 2024.
10
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the elderly patients: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于老年急性缺血性卒中患者的疗效比较:TRACE-2试验的事后分析
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Feb 25;10(1):112-119. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-003048.
静脉溶栓治疗中专业指南与产品标签选择:来自SITS注册研究的分析
Eur Stroke J. 2018 Mar;3(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/2396987317747737. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
The SITS-UTMOST: A registry-based prospective study in Europe investigating the impact of regulatory approval of intravenous Actilyse in the extended time window (3-4.5 h) in acute ischaemic stroke.SITS-UTMOST研究:一项基于注册登记的欧洲前瞻性研究,旨在调查静脉注射阿替普酶在急性缺血性卒中延长时间窗(3 - 4.5小时)内获得监管批准的影响。
Eur Stroke J. 2016 Sep;1(3):213-221. doi: 10.1177/2396987316661890. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
5
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2018 急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
6
Effects of alteplase for acute stroke according to criteria defining the European Union and United States marketing authorizations: Individual-patient-data meta-analysis of randomized trials.根据定义欧盟和美国上市许可标准的急性脑卒中阿替普酶治疗效果:随机试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Feb;13(2):175-189. doi: 10.1177/1747493017744464. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
7
Outcome after stroke thrombolysis in patients >80 years treated within 3 hours vs >3-4.5 hours.80岁以上患者在3小时内与3 - 4.5小时内接受中风溶栓治疗后的结果。
Neurology. 2017 Oct 10;89(15):1561-1568. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004499. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
8
Effects of Alteplase for Acute Stroke on the Distribution of Functional Outcomes: A Pooled Analysis of 9 Trials.阿替普酶治疗急性卒中对功能结局分布的影响:9项试验的汇总分析
Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2373-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013644. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
9
Risk of intracerebral haemorrhage with alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis.急性缺血性脑卒中后使用阿替普酶的颅内出血风险:一项个体患者数据分析荟萃分析的二次分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Aug;15(9):925-933. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30076-X. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
10
Analysis of the Modified Rankin Scale in Randomised Controlled Trials of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.急性缺血性卒中随机对照试验中改良Rankin量表的分析:一项系统评价
Stroke Res Treat. 2016;2016:9482876. doi: 10.1155/2016/9482876. Epub 2016 Mar 20.