• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年创伤性脑损伤的治疗:一项全国性队列研究。

Treatment of Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School.

出版信息

J Nippon Med Sch. 2021 Jun 30;88(3):194-203. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-404. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-404
PMID:32612015
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of the aging of the Japanese population, traumatic brain injuries (TBI) have increased in elderly adults. However, the effectiveness and prognosis of intensive treatment for geriatric TBI have not yet been determined. Thus, we used nationwide data from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank (JNTDB) projects to analyze prognostic factors for intensive and aggressive treatments.

METHODS

We analyzed 1,879 geriatric TBI cases (age ≥65 years) registered in four JNTDB projects: Project 1998 (P1998) to Project 2015 (P2015). Clinical features, use of aggressive treatment, and 6-month outcomes on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were compared among study projects. Logistic regression was used to identify prognostic factors in aggressively treated patients.

RESULTS

The percentage of geriatric TBI cases significantly increased with time-P1998: 30.1%; Project 2004 (P2004): 34.6%; Project 2009 (P2009): 43.9%; P2015: 53.6%, p<0.0001). Use of aggressive treatment also significantly increased, from 67.0% in P1998 to 69.3% in P2015 (p<0.0001). Less invasive methods, such as trepanation and normothermic targeted temperature management, were more often chosen for geriatric patients. These efforts resulted in a significant decrease in the 6-month mortality rate, from 76.2% in P1998 to 63.1% in P2015 (p=0.0003), although the percentage of severely disabled patients increased, from 8.9% in P1998 to 11.1% in P2015 (p=0.0003). Intraventricular hemorrhage was the factor most strongly associated with unfavorable 6-month outcomes (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.78-8.06, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Less invasive treatments reduced mortality in geriatric TBI but did not improve functional outcomes. Patient age was not the strongest prognostic factor; thus, physicians should consider characteristics other than age.

摘要

背景

由于日本人口老龄化,老年创伤性脑损伤(TBI)有所增加。然而,针对老年 TBI 的强化治疗的效果和预后尚未确定。因此,我们使用日本神经创伤数据库(JNTDB)项目的全国性数据来分析强化和积极治疗的预后因素。

方法

我们分析了在四个 JNTDB 项目(P1998 至 P2015 项目)中登记的 1879 例老年 TBI 病例(年龄≥65 岁)。比较了研究项目之间的临床特征、积极治疗的使用以及 6 个月时格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)的结果。使用逻辑回归分析积极治疗患者的预后因素。

结果

老年 TBI 病例的百分比随时间显著增加-P1998:30.1%;P2004 项目:34.6%;P2009 项目:43.9%;P2015 项目:53.6%,p<0.0001)。积极治疗的使用率也显著增加,从 P1998 年的 67.0%增加到 P2015 年的 69.3%(p<0.0001)。对于老年患者,更微创的方法,如颅骨钻孔和常温靶向体温管理,更常被选择。这些努力导致 6 个月死亡率显著下降,从 P1998 年的 76.2%下降到 P2015 年的 63.1%(p=0.0003),尽管严重残疾患者的比例从 P1998 年的 8.9%增加到 P2015 年的 11.1%(p=0.0003)。脑室内出血是与 6 个月不良结局最密切相关的因素(OR 3.79,95%CI 1.78-8.06,p<0.0001)。

结论

微创治疗降低了老年 TBI 的死亡率,但并未改善功能结局。患者年龄不是最强的预后因素;因此,医生应考虑除年龄以外的其他特征。

相似文献

1
Treatment of Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Nationwide Cohort Study.老年创伤性脑损伤的治疗:一项全国性队列研究。
J Nippon Med Sch. 2021 Jun 30;88(3):194-203. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-404. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Therapeutic temperature modulation in severe or moderate traumatic brain injury: a propensity score analysis of data from the Nationwide Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank.重度或中度创伤性脑损伤中的治疗性温度调节:来自日本全国神经创伤数据库数据的倾向评分分析
J Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;124(2):527-37. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.JNS141895. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
3
Risk of Deterioration of Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients Treated with Antithrombotic Drugs.接受抗血栓药物治疗的老年创伤性脑损伤患者病情恶化的风险
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e1221-e1227. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.108. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
Outcome and Refractory Factor of Intensive Treatment for Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Analysis of 1165 Cases Registered in the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank.老年创伤性脑损伤强化治疗的结局及难治因素:对日本神经创伤数据库登记的1165例病例的分析
World Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;86:127-133.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.105. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
5
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
6
Sequential changes in Rotterdam CT scores related to outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury who undergo decompressive craniectomy.接受减压性颅骨切除术的创伤性脑损伤患者的鹿特丹CT评分与预后相关的序贯变化。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1640-5. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142760. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Graphical presentation of probabilities.简化创伤性脑损伤预后信息的使用。第 2 部分:概率的图形表示。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1621-1634. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172782. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
8
External validation of the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury in Japan.日本严重创伤性脑损伤中 TRISS、CRASH 和 IMPACT 预后模型的外部验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221791. eCollection 2019.
9
Is It Reliable to Predict the Outcome of Elderly Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using the IMPACT Prognostic Calculator?使用IMPACT预后计算器预测老年重型颅脑损伤患者的预后是否可靠?
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:584-590. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.069. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
Differences between Men and Women in Treatment and Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury.男性和女性创伤性脑损伤治疗和预后的差异。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jan 15;38(2):235-251. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7228. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive and Proactive Approaches for Treatment of Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Elderly Patients.老年急性创伤性脑损伤的微创与积极治疗方法
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 16;14(14):5028. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145028.
2
Perioperative Management of the Geriatric Trauma Patient.老年创伤患者的围手术期管理
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2025;15. doi: 10.1007/s40140-024-00673-6. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
3
The time course of alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor and plasmin-alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor complex levels in patients with traumatic brain injury.
创伤性脑损伤患者α2-纤溶酶抑制剂及纤溶酶-α2-纤溶酶抑制剂复合物水平的时间进程
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Mar 25;167(1):90. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06496-6.
4
Impact of fever on the outcome non-anoxic acute brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.发热对非缺氧性急性脑损伤患者结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Nov 13;28(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05132-6.
5
Trends in mortality rates and correlations between intracranial injuries and external causes: A Japanese population study.死亡率趋势与颅内损伤和外部原因之间的相关性:一项日本人群研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0300846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300846. eCollection 2024.
6
Anisocoria without extraocular muscle impairment due to moderate traumatic brain injury with midbrain contusion: a case report.中度创伤性脑损伤伴中脑挫伤导致的无眼外肌损伤的瞳孔不等大:一例报告。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Jul 15;23(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03331-2.
7
Hyperfibrinolysis and fibrinolysis shutdown in patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的高纤维蛋白溶解和纤维蛋白溶解抑制。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 9;12(1):19107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23912-4.
8
Recent Advances in Cell-Based Therapies for Ischemic Stroke.细胞治疗缺血性脑卒中的最新进展。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 14;21(18):6718. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186718.