Suppr超能文献

社区卫生工作者在健康干预研究团队中的定位:范围综述。

Positionality of Community Health Workers on Health Intervention Research Teams: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

University of Arizona Health Sciences Library, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;8:208. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00208. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly involved as members of health intervention research teams. Given that CHWs are engaged in a variety of research roles, there is a need for better understanding of the ways in which CHWs are incorporated in research and the potential benefits. This scoping review synthesizes evidence regarding the kinds of health research studies involving CHWs, CHWs' roles in implementing health intervention research, their positionality on research teams, and how their involvement benefits health intervention research. The scoping review includes peer-reviewed health intervention articles published between 2008-2018 in the U.S. A search of PubMed, Embase and CINAHL identified a total of 3,129 titles and abstracts, 266 of which met the inclusion criteria and underwent full text review. A total of 130 articles were identified for a primary analysis of the research and the level of CHWs involvement, and of these 23 articles were included in a secondary analysis in which CHWs participated in 5 or more intervention research phases. The scoping review found that CHWs are involved across the spectrum of research, including developing research questions, intervention design, participant recruitment, intervention implementation, data collection, data analysis, and results dissemination. CHW positionality as research partners varied greatly across studies, and they are not uniformly integrated within all stages of research. The majority of these studies employed a community based participatory research (CBPR) approach, and CBPR studies included CHWs as research partners in more phases of research relative to non-CBPR studies. This scoping review documents specific benefits from the inclusion of CHWs as partners in health intervention research and identifies strategies to engage CHWs as research partners and to ensure that CHW contributions to research are well-documented.

摘要

社区卫生工作者(CHW)越来越多地作为卫生干预研究团队的成员参与其中。鉴于 CHW 从事各种研究角色,因此需要更好地了解将 CHW 纳入研究的方式以及潜在的好处。本范围综述综合了有关涉及 CHW 的健康研究的种类、CHW 在实施健康干预研究中的作用、他们在研究团队中的定位以及他们的参与如何使健康干预研究受益的证据。本范围综述包括 2008-2018 年在美国发表的同行评审的健康干预文章。对 PubMed、Embase 和 CINAHL 的搜索共确定了 3129 个标题和摘要,其中 266 个符合纳入标准并进行了全文审查。共有 130 篇文章被确定为研究和 CHW 参与程度的主要分析,其中 23 篇文章被纳入二次分析,其中 CHW 参与了 5 个或更多的干预研究阶段。范围综述发现,CHW 参与了研究的各个方面,包括提出研究问题、干预设计、参与者招募、干预实施、数据收集、数据分析和结果传播。CHW 的研究伙伴定位在不同的研究中差异很大,他们在研究的所有阶段都没有统一地融入。这些研究大多数采用社区参与式研究(CBPR)方法,并且与非 CBPR 研究相比,CBPR 研究将 CHW 作为研究伙伴纳入了更多的研究阶段。本范围综述记录了将 CHW 作为健康干预研究伙伴纳入的具体好处,并确定了使 CHW 作为研究伙伴参与并确保 CHW 对研究的贡献得到妥善记录的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验