• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜下高位直肠肿瘤部分直肠系膜切除术:单中心倾向评分匹配分析研究。

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Mesorectal Excision for Cancer of the High Rectum: A Single-Center Study with Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

机构信息

Unit of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil, France.

EA7375 (EC2M3 Research Team), Université Paris Est, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000, Créteil, France.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2020 Nov;44(11):3923-3935. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05666-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-020-05666-0
PMID:32613345
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of robotic surgery for partial mesorectal excision (PME) in patients with high rectal cancer (RC) remains unexplored. This study aimed to compare the operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic (R-PME) versus laparoscopic (L-PME) PME for high RC.

METHODS

This was a single-center propensity score cohort study of consecutive patients diagnosed with RC in the high rectum (>10 to 15 cm from the anal verge) who underwent surgery between September 2012 and May 2019.

RESULTS

Of 131 selected patients (50 R-PME and 81 L-PME), 88 were matched using propensity score (44 per group). Operative and postoperative variables were similar between R-PME and L-PME patients, except for operative time (220 min and 190 min, respectively; p < 0.0001). No conversion was needed. Overall morbidity was 15.9%; 4 patients (4.5%) developed anastomotic leakage. The mean hospital stay was 7.25 days for R-PME vs. 7.64 days for L-PME (p = 0.597). R0 resection was achieved in 100% of R-PME and 90.9% of L-PME (p = 0.116). Only 3 patients (1 R-PME, 2 L-PME) received a permanent stoma (p = 1). No group differences were observed for overall or disease-free survival rates at 5 years. The costs of R-PME were significantly higher than those of L-PME.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery can be performed safely for PME in high RC. No difference can be detected between R-PME and L-PME for both short- and long-term outcomes, leaving the choice of the surgical approach to the surgeon's experience. Specific health economic studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery for RC.

摘要

背景

机器人手术在高位直肠癌(RC)患者中的部分直肠系膜切除术(PME)的作用仍未得到探索。本研究旨在比较机器人(R-PME)与腹腔镜(L-PME)在高位 RC 中的 PME 手术的操作和术后结果。

方法

这是一项单中心倾向评分队列研究,连续纳入 2012 年 9 月至 2019 年 5 月期间诊断为高位 RC(距肛门缘>10-15cm)并接受手术的患者。

结果

在 131 名入选患者中(50 名 R-PME 和 81 名 L-PME),通过倾向评分匹配了 88 名患者(每组 44 名)。R-PME 和 L-PME 患者的手术和术后变量相似,除了手术时间(分别为 220min 和 190min;p<0.0001)。没有需要转换。总发病率为 15.9%;4 名患者(4.5%)发生吻合口漏。R-PME 的平均住院时间为 7.25 天,L-PME 为 7.64 天(p=0.597)。R-PME 组 100%达到 R0 切除,L-PME 组为 90.9%(p=0.116)。仅 3 名患者(1 名 R-PME,2 名 L-PME)接受永久性造口术(p=1)。两组在 5 年的总生存率和无病生存率方面无差异。R-PME 的成本明显高于 L-PME。

结论

微创外科手术可以安全地进行高位 RC 的 PME。在短期和长期结果方面,R-PME 和 L-PME 之间没有差异,手术方法的选择留给外科医生的经验。需要进行特定的卫生经济学研究来评估机器人手术在 RC 中的成本效益。

相似文献

1
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Mesorectal Excision for Cancer of the High Rectum: A Single-Center Study with Propensity Score Matching Analysis.机器人与腹腔镜下高位直肠肿瘤部分直肠系膜切除术:单中心倾向评分匹配分析研究。
World J Surg. 2020 Nov;44(11):3923-3935. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05666-0.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case-matched analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术:倾向病例匹配分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Feb;15(1):e1965. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1965. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
3
Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.与腹腔镜切除术相比,机器人切除术是直肠癌的一个良好预后因素:使用倾向评分匹配的长期生存分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Mar;60(3):266-273. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000770.
4
[Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].[机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术联合或不联合侧方淋巴结清扫治疗中低位进展期直肠癌的短期疗效:一项倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):370-376. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190725-00289.
5
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
6
Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching.采用倾向评分匹配比较机器人与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的早期经验。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):757-763. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6340-8. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
7
Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除质量与环周切缘深度:前20例机器人手术病例的配对比较
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):603-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12634.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术用于保留肛门手术:单中心 130 例连续患者的病理和短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4085-4091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5455-7. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
9
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
10
The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.手术入路对老年直肠癌患者直肠切除术后短期和长期结局的影响:国家癌症数据库倾向评分匹配比较机器人、腹腔镜和开放入路。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1269-1277. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08401-5. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Intervention for impending pathological fractures at proximal femur is associated with lower mortality rates in patients with intermediate-to-high risk according to the Katagiri-New score.根据片桐新评分系统,对于中高危患者,股骨近端即将发生病理性骨折的干预与较低的死亡率相关。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 22;25(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07838-8.
2
The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助手术在直肠癌治疗中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6282-6296. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001380.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy: a comparative study of short-term economic and clinical outcomes.
机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术:短期经济和临床结局的比较研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 7;38(1):161. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04446-1.
4
Application of laparoscopic modified Bacon operation in patients with low rectal cancer and analysis of the changes in anal function: A retrospective single-center study.腹腔镜改良Bacon手术在低位直肠癌患者中的应用及肛门功能变化分析:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 31;13:1087642. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1087642. eCollection 2023.
5
Short-term outcomes of da Vinci Xi versus Si robotic systems for minor hepatectomies.达芬奇 Xi 与 Si 机器人系统用于小肝切除术的短期结果。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Oct 26;93(5):e2022223. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i5.12851.
6
A retrospective study of post-operative complications and cost analysis in robotic rectal resection versus laparoscopic rectal resection.机器人直肠切除术与腹腔镜直肠切除术术后并发症的回顾性研究及成本分析
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 19;9:969038. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.969038. eCollection 2022.
7
Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper.机器人手术在急救环境中的应用:2021 年 WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00410-6.
8
Robotic-Assisted vs. Standard Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 19,731 Patients.机器人辅助与标准腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌切除术:对19731例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;14(1):180. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010180.