• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助手术对团队绩效的影响:系统混合研究综述。

The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Surgery on Team Performance: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review.

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery & Menzies Institute of Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2021 Dec;63(8):1352-1379. doi: 10.1177/0018720820928624. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1177/0018720820928624
PMID:32613863
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe the impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team performance in the operating room.

BACKGROUND

The introduction of surgical robots has improved the technical performance of surgical procedures but has also contributed to unexpected interactions in surgical teams, leading to new types of errors.

METHOD

A systematic literature search of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases using key words and MeSH terms was conducted. Screening identified studies employing qualitative and quantitative methods published between January 2000 and September 2019. Two reviewers independently appraised the methodological quality of the articles using the (2018). Discussions were held among authors to examine quality scores of the studies and emergent themes, and agreement was reached through consensus. Themes were derived using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Combined searches identified 1,065 citations. Of these, 19 articles, 16 quantitative and 3 qualitative, were included. Robotic-assisted surgeries included urology, gynecology, cardiac, and general procedures involving surgeons, anesthetists, nurses, and technicians. Three themes emerged; and .

CONCLUSION

Inclusion of a robot as a team member adds further complexity to the work of surgery.

APPLICATION

These review findings will inform training programs specifically designed to optimize teamwork, workflow efficiency, and learning needs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述机器人辅助手术对手术室团队绩效的影响。

背景

外科机器人的引入提高了手术操作的技术性能,但也导致了手术团队中意想不到的相互作用,从而产生了新类型的错误。

方法

使用关键词和 MeSH 术语对 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、PubMed、ProQuest、Cochrane、Web of Science、PsycINFO 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统的文献检索。筛选出 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 9 月期间发表的采用定性和定量方法的研究。两名评审员独立使用(2018 年)评估文章的方法学质量。作者之间进行了讨论,以检查研究的质量评分和新兴主题,并通过达成共识来达成一致。使用归纳内容分析得出主题。

结果

联合搜索确定了 1065 条引文。其中,19 篇文章,16 篇定量和 3 篇定性,被纳入研究。机器人辅助手术包括泌尿科、妇产科、心脏科和一般手术,涉及外科医生、麻醉师、护士和技术人员。出现了三个主题;机器人辅助手术增加了手术团队工作的复杂性;机器人的引入需要重新设计手术流程和工作空间;机器人的使用需要对手术团队进行培训。

结论

机器人作为团队成员的加入增加了手术工作的复杂性。

应用

这些综述结果将为专门设计的培训计划提供信息,以优化团队合作、工作流程效率和学习需求。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Surgery on Team Performance: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review.机器人辅助手术对团队绩效的影响:系统混合研究综述。
Hum Factors. 2021 Dec;63(8):1352-1379. doi: 10.1177/0018720820928624. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions.机器人辅助手术中的工作系统干预:一项系统评价,探讨挑战与解决方案之间的差距。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):1976-1989. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08231-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Factors affecting workflow in robot-assisted surgery: a scoping review.影响机器人辅助手术流程的因素:范围综述。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8713-8725. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09373-w. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
6
Integrative Literature Review Examining Factors Affecting Patient Safety With Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgeries.综合文献回顾:机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术患者安全的影响因素研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Nov;50(6):645-652. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12437. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
7
Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis.机器人手术中的安全性、效率和学习曲线:一项人为因素分析。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3749-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4671-2. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
8
RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings.RAS-NOTECHS:一种用于测量机器人辅助手术环境中非技术技能的工具的有效性和可靠性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1916-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08474-2. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
9
Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.机器人辅助手术中非技术技能的评估和应用:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1758-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10713-1. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
10
Workflow disruptions in robot-assisted surgery.机器人辅助手术中的工作流程中断。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2663-2669. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01728-2. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparisons between aviation and robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology: lessons from safety practices in high-risk industries.妇科领域中航空手术与机器人辅助手术的比较:高风险行业安全实践的经验教训。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 8;19(1):275. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02440-z.
2
Impact of operating room technology on intra-operative nurses' workload and job satisfaction: An observational study.手术室技术对术中护士工作量和工作满意度的影响:一项观察性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Apr 29;8:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100341. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Superior accuracy of femoral bone tunnel drilling in robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
机器人辅助前交叉韧带重建中股骨骨隧道钻孔的更高准确性:一项多中心、随机、对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 1;111(6):3886-3894. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002439. Epub 2025 May 12.
4
A pan-European survey of robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery: European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC) initiative.一项针对胃肠外科机器人培训的泛欧调查:欧洲机器人手术共识(ERSC)倡议。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):907-921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11373-x. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
5
How experienced robotic nurses adapt to the Hugo™ RAS system.经验丰富的机器人护士如何适应Hugo™远程医疗辅助系统。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 11;18(1):114. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01878-x.
6
Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review.手术室组织与手术绩效:一项系统综述。
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Jan 29;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00388-3.
7
Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network.行为科学在急症护理团队中的应用:一个欧洲研究网络的未来研究议程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10555-6.
8
Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.切塞纳指南:WSES 关于普通外科急症和腹部创伤腹腔镜优先方法的共识声明。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9.
9
Unpacking the Broad Landscape of Intraoperative Stressors for Clinical Personnel: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.剖析临床人员术中应激源的广阔图景:一项混合方法的系统综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jul 17;16:1953-1977. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S401325. eCollection 2023.
10
Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper.微创急诊消化外科学培训课程:2022 WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w.