文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

机器人辅助手术中非技术技能的评估和应用:系统评价。

Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

机构信息

MSc Patient Safety and Human Clinical Factors, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital, Yeovil, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1758-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10713-1. Epub 2024 Mar 11.


DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10713-1
PMID:38467862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978706/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Undeniably, robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has become very popular in recent decades, but it has introduced challenges to the workflow of the surgical team. Non-technical skills (NTS) have received less emphasis than technical skills in training and assessment. The systematic review aimed to update the evidence on the role of NTS in robotic surgery, specifically focusing on evaluating assessment tools and their utilisation in training and surgical education in robotic surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and EMBASE was conducted to identify primary articles on NTS in RAS. Messick's validity framework and the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument were utilised to evaluate the quality of the validity evidence of the abstracted articles. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were eligible for the final analysis. Communication, environmental factors, anticipation and teamwork were key NTS for RAS. Team-related factors such as ambient noise and chatter, inconveniences due to repeated requests during the procedure and constraints due to poor design of the operating room may harm patient safety during RAS. Three novel rater-based scoring systems and one sensor-based method for assessing NTS in RAS were identified. Anticipation by the team to predict and execute the next move before an explicit verbal command improved the surgeon's situational awareness. CONCLUSION: This systematic review highlighted the paucity of reporting on non-technical skills in robotic surgery with only three bespoke objective assessment tools being identified. Communication, environmental factors, anticipation, and teamwork are the key non-technical skills reported in robotic surgery, and further research is required to investigate their benefits to improve patient safety during robotic surgery.

摘要

背景:不可否认,机器人辅助手术(RAS)在近几十年来变得非常流行,但它给手术团队的工作流程带来了挑战。非技术技能(NTS)在培训和评估中的重视程度不如技术技能。本系统评价旨在更新关于 NTS 在机器人手术中的作用的证据,特别是评估评估工具及其在机器人手术培训和外科教育中的应用。

方法:对 PubMed、PsycINFO、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 进行系统文献检索,以确定关于 RAS 中 NTS 的原始文章。使用 Messick 的有效性框架和修改后的医学教育研究研究质量工具评估摘要文章的有效性证据质量。

结果:有 17 项研究符合最终分析的条件。沟通、环境因素、预测和团队合作是 RAS 的关键 NTS。团队相关因素,如环境噪音和闲聊、由于手术过程中反复请求而带来的不便以及由于手术室设计不佳而导致的限制,可能会危害 RAS 期间的患者安全。确定了三种新的基于评分者的评分系统和一种用于评估 RAS 中 NTS 的基于传感器的方法。团队提前预测并在明确口头命令之前执行下一步动作,提高了外科医生的态势感知能力。

结论:本系统评价强调了在机器人手术中报告非技术技能的不足,仅确定了三种定制的客观评估工具。沟通、环境因素、预测和团队合作是机器人手术中报告的关键非技术技能,需要进一步研究这些技能对提高机器人手术期间患者安全的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2a/10978706/3e0e99f7a437/464_2024_10713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2a/10978706/bd9522fb3f55/464_2024_10713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2a/10978706/3e0e99f7a437/464_2024_10713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2a/10978706/bd9522fb3f55/464_2024_10713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2a/10978706/3e0e99f7a437/464_2024_10713_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Surg Endosc. 2024-4

[2]
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[3]
Non-technical skills in minimally invasive surgery teams: a systematic review.

Surg Endosc. 2016-12

[4]
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training

2025-1

[5]
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].

Epidemiol Prev. 2013

[6]
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-8

[7]
A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery.

Eur Urol. 2015-10-1

[8]
Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-9-9

[9]
Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024-8

[10]
Training and education of operating room nurses in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Surg Endosc. 2024-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Robotic surgical curriculum for medical students: a scoping review.

J Robot Surg. 2025-8-19

[2]
Feasibility of large language models for assessing and coaching surgeons' non-technical skills.

Npj Health Syst. 2025

[3]
Essential components and validation of multi-specialty robotic surgical training curricula: a systematic review.

Int J Surg. 2025-4-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Intraoperative workload during robotic radical prostatectomy: Comparison between multi-port da Vinci Xi and single port da Vinci SP robots.

Appl Ergon. 2022-10

[2]
Objective Nontechnical Skills Measurement Using Sensor-based Behavior Metrics in Surgical Teams.

Hum Factors. 2024-3

[3]
Design and Implementation of an Emergency Undocking Curriculum for Robotic Surgery.

Simul Healthc. 2022-4-1

[4]
RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings.

Surg Endosc. 2022-3

[5]
Objective Measures of Surgeon Non-Technical Skills in Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Hum Factors. 2022-2

[6]
Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions.

Surg Endosc. 2021-5

[7]
Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?

Investig Clin Urol. 2021-1

[8]
Evaluating Non-operative Robotic Skills in Colorectal Surgical Training.

J Surg Res. 2021-4

[9]
Non-technical skills in robotic surgery and impact on near-miss events: a multi-center study.

Surg Endosc. 2021-9

[10]
A methodology for Dynamic Human Reliability Analysis in Robotic Surgery.

Appl Ergon. 2020-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索