• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类受试者研究伦理与监管方面的历史视角:对非洲肿瘤学临床试验的启示

Historical Perspectives on Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Human Participants Research: Implications for Oncology Clinical Trials in Africa.

作者信息

Salhia Bodour, Olaiya Victoria

机构信息

Department of Translational Research, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.

Synteract Limited, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jun;6:959-965. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00196.

DOI:10.1200/JGO.19.00196
PMID:32614729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7392783/
Abstract

Clinical trials research involving human participants has led to numerous medical advances. Historically, however, clinical trials research was the source of major concerns for the safety and welfare of the human participants taking part in these studies. The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice came about in response to medical atrocities, and regulations were ultimately put in place to protect the rights and welfare of human participants and to maintain the public trust in the research enterprise. Today, clinical trials are one of the most heavily regulated practices in the world, and yet still not all people are provided the same oversights and protections, with improprieties disproportionately affecting poor-resource nations and vulnerable populations. As Africa approaches the post-communicable disease era, cancer is set to take the lead as the most burdensome disease, making the need for oncology clinical trials in Africa greater than ever before. Africa represents a heterogeneous market with 55 countries, most with their own National Regulatory Agency (NRA) and each with varying levels of regulatory maturity. This diversity creates a highly complex regulatory environment and causes challenges when bringing drugs to market. There is a large need for harmonization and increased collaboration between the African nations' NRAs. In addition, many African countries need to be better equipped to handle research ethics committees and/or learn how to rely on neighboring countries with more established ethics committees. Well-run clinical trials offer solutions to national health care problems, and all people deserve equal access to their benefits.

摘要

涉及人类受试者的临床试验研究带来了众多医学进步。然而,从历史上看,临床试验研究曾是参与这些研究的人类受试者的安全和福祉的主要担忧来源。自主、行善和公正等伦理原则是为应对医疗暴行而产生的,最终制定了相关法规以保护人类受试者的权利和福祉,并维持公众对研究事业的信任。如今,临床试验是世界上监管最为严格的实践之一,但仍并非所有人都能得到相同的监督和保护,不当行为对资源匮乏国家和弱势群体的影响尤为严重。随着非洲进入后传染病时代,癌症将成为负担最重的疾病,这使得非洲对肿瘤学临床试验的需求比以往任何时候都更加迫切。非洲是一个由55个国家组成的多样化市场,大多数国家都有自己的国家监管机构(NRA),且每个国家的监管成熟度各不相同。这种多样性创造了一个高度复杂的监管环境,并在将药物推向市场时带来挑战。非洲各国的国家监管机构非常需要进行协调并加强合作。此外,许多非洲国家需要更好地配备处理研究伦理委员会的能力,和/或学习如何依靠周边拥有更成熟伦理委员会的国家。运行良好的临床试验为国家医疗保健问题提供了解决方案,所有人都应该平等地受益于临床试验。

相似文献

1
Historical Perspectives on Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Human Participants Research: Implications for Oncology Clinical Trials in Africa.人类受试者研究伦理与监管方面的历史视角:对非洲肿瘤学临床试验的启示
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jun;6:959-965. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00196.
2
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
3
Disparate compensation policies for research related injury in an era of multinational trials: a case study of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.跨国试验时代针对研究相关损伤的不同补偿政策:以巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非为例的研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0244-y.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
5
Research bioethics in the Ugandan context: a program summary.乌干达背景下的研究生物伦理学:项目概述
J Law Med Ethics. 1996 Spring;24(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1996.tb01832.x.
6
Tuberculosis结核病
7
The ethics of clinical research in the era of COVID-19.COVID-19 时代的临床研究伦理。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 6;12:1359654. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359654. eCollection 2024.
8
From evidence-based to hope-based medicine? Ethical aspects on conditional market authorization of and early access to new cancer drugs.从循证医学到以希望为基础的医学?有条件市场授权和早期获得新癌症药物的伦理问题。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2017 Aug;45:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.新生儿比较疗效试验中的伦理陷阱。
Neonatology. 2014;105(4):350-1. doi: 10.1159/000360650. Epub 2014 May 30.
10
Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?强制进行研究伦理审查合乎伦理道德吗?
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):517-20. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100274. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Ethical Concerns Involving Vulnerable Human Participant Populations in Medical Research: Mixed-Method Analysis of Liberian Ebola Survivors' Experiences in PREVAIL I-VII.理解医学研究中涉及弱势人类受试者群体的伦理问题:对利比里亚埃博拉幸存者在PREVAIL I - VII中的经历进行混合方法分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 5;12(19):1989. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191989.
2
Global Equity in Clinical Trials: An ASCO Policy Statement.全球临床试验中的公平性:美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Mar;10:e2400015. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00015.
3
More on the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis.关于塔斯基吉未治疗梅毒研究的更多内容。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Aug;6:1312-1313. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00340.
4
Oncology Clinical Trials in Africa: Emerging and Operational Issues.非洲的肿瘤学临床试验:新出现的问题与实施问题
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jun;6:929-931. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00233.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical challenges in global health-related stigma research.全球健康相关污名研究中的伦理挑战。
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 29;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1317-6.
2
Recently proposed changes to legal and ethical guidelines governing human subjects research.最近提议对涉及人类受试者研究的法律和伦理准则进行修改。
J Law Biosci. 2016 Feb 6;3(1):206-216. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsw001. eCollection 2016 Apr.
3
Henry K. Beecher and the Oversight of Research in Children.亨利·K·比彻与儿童研究的监督
Perspect Biol Med. 2016;59(1):95-106. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2016.0017.
4
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
5
The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research.人体研究的历史、伦理和法律背景。
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1325-9.
6
The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: a case study.非洲研究伦理委员会的结构与功能:一项案例研究
PLoS Med. 2007 Jan;4(1):e3. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040003.
7
Resource and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: preparations for HIV vaccine trials.非洲研究伦理委员会的资源与需求:为艾滋病毒疫苗试验做准备
IRB. 2006 Mar-Apr;28(2):1-9.
8
Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region.世界卫生组织非洲区域国家研究伦理委员会的现状
BMC Med Ethics. 2005 Oct 20;6:E10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-6-10.
9
International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.涉及人类受试者的生物医学研究国际伦理准则。
Bull Med Ethics. 2002 Oct(182):17-23.
10
Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.生物伦理学、脆弱性与保护
Bioethics. 2003 Oct;17(5-6):472-86. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00362.