Thind Harjot, Ramanathan Dinesh, Ebinu Julius, Copenhaver David, Kim Kee D
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Neurospine. 2020 Jun;17(2):365-373. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040004.002. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
To evaluate whether anterior cervical spine surgery offers sustained (7 years) relief in patients with cervicogenic headaches (CGHs), and evaluate the difference between cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for 1 and 2-level surgeries from a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
A post hoc analysis was performed of 575 patients who underwent one or 2-level CDA or ACDF for symptomatic cervical spondylosis as part of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Assessment of pain and functional outcome was done with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in the trial. We used the NDI headache component to assess headache outcome.
For both 1- and 2-level CDA and ACDF groups, there was significant headache improvement from preoperative baseline out to 7 years (p < 0.0001). For 1-level surgeries, headache improvement was similar for both groups at the 7-year point. For 2-level treatment, CDA patients had significantly improved headache scores versus ACDF patients at the 7-year point (p = 0.016).
The headache improvement noted at early follow-up was sustained over the long-term period with ACDF and CDA populations. In the case of 2-level operations, CDA patients demonstrated significantly greater benefit compared to ACDF patients over the long-term. Sinuvertebral nerve irritation at the unco-vasculo-radicular junction and anterior dura may be the cause of CGH. Therefore, it is possible that improved cervical kinematics and preservation of range of motion at adjacent uncovertebral joints in CDA may contribute to the observed difference between the groups.
评估颈椎前路手术是否能为颈源性头痛(CGH)患者提供持续(7年)缓解,并从一项多中心随机临床试验中评估颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)在单节段和双节段手术中的差异。
对575例因症状性颈椎病接受单节段或双节段CDA或ACDF手术的患者进行事后分析,这些患者是一项前瞻性随机临床试验的一部分。在试验中,使用颈部残疾指数(NDI)评估疼痛和功能结局。我们使用NDI头痛分量表评估头痛结局。
对于单节段和双节段CDA组和ACDF组,从术前基线到7年,头痛均有显著改善(p<0.0001)。对于单节段手术,两组在7年时头痛改善情况相似。对于双节段治疗,在7年时,CDA患者的头痛评分相比ACDF患者有显著改善(p=0.016)。
ACDF组和CDA组在早期随访中观察到的头痛改善在长期内得以维持。在双节段手术的情况下,长期来看,CDA患者相比ACDF患者表现出显著更大的获益。钩椎血管神经根交界处和前硬脊膜处的窦椎神经刺激可能是CGH的病因。因此,CDA中颈椎运动学的改善以及相邻钩椎关节活动范围的保留可能是导致两组间观察到差异的原因。