Shen Changbing, Li Chengxu, Xu Feng, Wang Ziyi, Shen Xue, Gao Jing, Ko Randy, Jing Yan, Tang Xiaofeng, Yu Ruixing, Guo Junhu, Xu Feng, Meng Rusong, Cui Yong
Department of Dermatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(11):698. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.102.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a powerful tool and is attracting more attention in the field of medicine. There are a number of AI studies focusing on skin diseases, and there are many AI products that have been applied in dermatology. However, the attitudes of dermatologists, specifically those from China, towards AI, is not clear as few, if any studies have focused on this issue.
A web-based questionnaire was designed by experts from the Chinese Skin Image Database (CSID) and published on the UMER Doctor platform (an online learning platform for dermatologists developed by the Shanghai Wheat Color Intelligent Technology Company, China). A total of 1,228 Chinese dermatologists were recruited and provided answers to the questionnaire online. The differences of dermatologists' attitudes towards AI among the different groups (stratified by age, gender, hospital level, education degree, professional title, and hospital ownership) were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The correlations between stratified factors and dermatologists' attitudes towards AI were calculated by using the Spearman's rank correlation test. SPSS (version 22.0) was utilized for all analyses. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.
A total of 1,228 Chinese dermatologists from 30 provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities, and other regions (including Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan) participated in this survey. The dermatologists who participated acquired AI-related information mainly through the Internet, meetings or forums, and 70.51% of participated dermatologists acquired AI-related information by two or more approaches. In total, 99.51% of participated dermatologists pay attention (general, passive-active, and active attention) to information pertaining to AI. Stratified analyses revealed statistically significant differences in their attention levels (unconcerned, general, passive-active, and active attention) to AI-related information by gender, hospital level, education degree, and professional title (P values ≤1.79E-02). In total, 95.36% of the participated dermatologists thought the role of AI to be in "assisting the daily diagnosis and treatment activities for dermatologists". Stratified analyses about the thought of AI roles (unconcerned, useless, assist, and replace) showed that there was no statistically significant difference except for the hospital level (P value =4.09E-03). The correlations between stratified factors with attention levels and the opinions of AI roles showed extremely weak correlations. Furthermore, 64.17% of participated dermatologists thought secondary hospitals in China are in most need of the application AI, and 91.78% of participated dermatologists thought the priority implementation of AI should be in skin tumors.
The majority of Chinese dermatologists are interested in AI information and acquired information about AI through a variety of approaches. Nearly all dermatologists are attentive to information on AI and think the role of AI is in "assisting the daily diagnosis and treatment activities for dermatologists". Future AI implementation should be primarily focused on skin tumors and utilized in in secondary hospitals.
人工智能(AI)已成为一种强大工具,在医学领域正吸引着更多关注。有许多关于皮肤病的人工智能研究,并且有许多人工智能产品已应用于皮肤科。然而,皮肤科医生,特别是来自中国的皮肤科医生,对人工智能的态度尚不清楚,因为很少有研究关注这一问题。
由中国皮肤图像数据库(CSID)的专家设计了一份基于网络的问卷,并发布在UMER Doctor平台(由中国上海麦色智能科技公司开发的皮肤科医生在线学习平台)上。共招募了1228名中国皮肤科医生,并让他们在线回答问卷。使用曼-惠特尼U检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯H检验比较不同组(按年龄、性别、医院级别、教育程度、职称和医院所有制分层)的皮肤科医生对人工智能态度的差异。使用斯皮尔曼等级相关检验计算分层因素与皮肤科医生对人工智能态度之间的相关性。所有分析均使用SPSS(版本22.0)。在所有分析中,双侧P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
来自30个省、自治区、直辖市及其他地区(包括香港、澳门和台湾)的1228名中国皮肤科医生参与了本次调查。参与调查的皮肤科医生获取人工智能相关信息主要通过互联网、会议或论坛,70.51%的参与调查的皮肤科医生通过两种或更多途径获取人工智能相关信息。总共,99.51%的参与调查的皮肤科医生关注(一般关注、被动-主动关注和主动关注)与人工智能相关的信息。分层分析显示,不同性别、医院级别、教育程度和职称的皮肤科医生对人工智能相关信息的关注程度(不关注、一般关注、被动-主动关注和主动关注)存在统计学显著差异(P值≤1.79E-02)。总共,95.36%的参与调查的皮肤科医生认为人工智能的作用是“辅助皮肤科医生的日常诊疗活动”。关于人工智能作用的想法(不关注、无用、辅助和替代)的分层分析表明,除医院级别外没有统计学显著差异(P值=4.09E-03)。分层因素与关注程度及人工智能作用观点之间的相关性显示出极其微弱的相关性。此外,64.17%的参与调查的皮肤科医生认为中国的二级医院最需要应用人工智能,91.78%的参与调查的皮肤科医生认为人工智能的优先应用领域应该是皮肤肿瘤。
大多数中国皮肤科医生对人工智能信息感兴趣,并通过多种途径获取有关人工智能的信息。几乎所有皮肤科医生都关注人工智能信息,并认为人工智能的作用是“辅助皮肤科医生的日常诊疗活动”。未来人工智能的应用应主要集中在皮肤肿瘤方面,并应用于二级医院。