• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策通过改变海马体的联想记忆来影响未来的选择。

Decisions bias future choices by modifying hippocampal associative memories.

机构信息

Biological Psychology of Decision Making, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 3;11(1):3318. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17192-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-17192-7
PMID:32620879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7335207/
Abstract

Decision-making is guided by memories of option values. However, retrieving items from memory renders them malleable. Here, we show that merely retrieving values from memory and making a choice between options is sufficient both to induce changes to stimulus-reward associations in the hippocampus and to bias future decision-making. After allowing participants to make repeated choices between reward-conditioned stimuli, in the absence of any outcome, we observe that participants prefer stimuli they have previously chosen, and neglect previously unchosen stimuli, over otherwise identical-valued options. Using functional brain imaging, we show that decisions induce changes to hippocampal representations of stimulus-outcome associations. These changes are correlated with future decision biases. Our results indicate that choice-induced preference changes are partially driven by choice-induced modification of memory representations and suggest that merely making a choice - even without experiencing any outcomes - induces associative plasticity.

摘要

决策是由对选项价值的记忆引导的。然而,从记忆中检索项目会使它们变得易于塑造。在这里,我们表明,仅仅从记忆中检索值并在选项之间做出选择,就足以引起海马体中刺激-奖励关联的变化,并影响未来的决策。在允许参与者在没有任何结果的情况下,反复在奖励条件刺激之间做出选择之后,我们观察到参与者更喜欢他们之前选择过的刺激,而忽略了之前未选择过的刺激,而不是选择其他具有相同价值的选项。使用功能脑成像,我们表明,决策会引起海马体中刺激-结果关联的表示发生变化。这些变化与未来的决策偏差相关。我们的结果表明,选择引起的偏好变化部分是由记忆表示的选择引起的修改驱动的,这表明即使不经历任何结果,仅仅做出选择也会引起联想可塑性。

相似文献

1
Decisions bias future choices by modifying hippocampal associative memories.决策通过改变海马体的联想记忆来影响未来的选择。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 3;11(1):3318. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17192-7.
2
Preference by association: how memory mechanisms in the hippocampus bias decisions.关联偏好:海马体中的记忆机制如何影响决策。
Science. 2012 Oct 12;338(6104):270-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1223252.
3
Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.艰难的决策塑造偏好的神经编码。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 23;39(4):718-726. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1681-18.2018. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
Online evaluation of novel choices by simultaneous representation of multiple memories.通过同时呈现多个记忆来在线评估新选择。
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Oct;16(10):1492-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.3515. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
5
Memory guidance of value-based decision making at an abstract level of representation.基于价值的决策的记忆引导在表示的抽象层次上。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 9;10(1):21496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78460-6.
6
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
7
Memory Reactivation during Learning Simultaneously Promotes Dentate Gyrus/CA Pattern Differentiation and CA Memory Integration.学习过程中重激活记忆可同时促进齿状回/CA 区模式分化和 CA 区记忆整合。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jan 27;41(4):726-738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0394-20.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Memory and decision making interact to shape the value of unchosen options.记忆和决策相互作用,共同塑造未被选择选项的价值。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 30;12(1):4648. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24907-x.
9
Conditioned associations and economic decision biases.条件关联与经济决策偏差。
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.021. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
10
Effective Connectivity between Hippocampus and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Controls Preferential Choices from Memory.海马体和腹内侧前额叶皮层之间的有效连接控制着来自记忆的优先选择。
Neuron. 2015 May 20;86(4):1078-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.04.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural mechanisms of credit assignment for delayed outcomes during contingent learning.偶联学习中延迟结果的信用分配神经机制。
Elife. 2025 Apr 15;13:RP101841. doi: 10.7554/eLife.101841.
2
Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.通过顺序采样进行价值构建解释了决策中的序列依赖性。
Elife. 2024 Dec 10;13:RP96997. doi: 10.7554/eLife.96997.
3
Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.通过顺序采样进行价值构建解释了决策中的序列依赖性。

本文引用的文献

1
Memory for individual items is related to nonreinforced preference change.个体项目的记忆与非强化偏好改变有关。
Learn Mem. 2021 Sep 15;28(10):348-360. doi: 10.1101/lm.053411.121. Print 2021 Oct.
2
Enhanced striatal and prefrontal activity is associated with individual differences in nonreinforced preference change for faces.增强的纹状体和前额叶活动与非强化的面孔偏好变化的个体差异相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):1043-1060. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24859. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
Nonmonotonic Plasticity: How Memory Retrieval Drives Learning.
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 11:2024.01.13.575363. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.13.575363.
4
Neural mechanisms of credit assignment for delayed outcomes during contingent learning.偶发学习中延迟结果的信用分配神经机制。
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 12:2024.08.06.606895. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.06.606895.
5
Bayesian evaluation of diverging theories of episodic and affective memory distortions in dysphoria.在抑郁中对离散记忆和情感记忆扭曲的理论进行贝叶斯评估。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 13;15(1):1320. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45203-4.
6
Removal of reinforcement improves instrumental performance in humans by decreasing a general action bias rather than unmasking learnt associations.去除强化物通过减少一般动作偏差而不是揭示已习得的关联来提高人类的工具性表现。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Dec 8;18(12):e1010201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010201. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
The value of confidence: Confidence prediction errors drive value-based learning in the absence of external feedback.信心的价值:在缺乏外部反馈的情况下,信心预测误差驱动基于价值的学习。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 3;18(10):e1010580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010580. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Memory for individual items is related to nonreinforced preference change.个体项目的记忆与非强化偏好改变有关。
Learn Mem. 2021 Sep 15;28(10):348-360. doi: 10.1101/lm.053411.121. Print 2021 Oct.
非单调塑性:记忆提取如何驱动学习。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Sep;23(9):726-742. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
Human Replay Spontaneously Reorganizes Experience.人类的重放会自发地重组经验。
Cell. 2019 Jul 25;178(3):640-652.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
Is ventromedial prefrontal cortex critical for behavior change without external reinforcement?腹内侧前额叶皮质对于没有外部强化的行为改变是否至关重要?
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 18;124:208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
6
What Is a Cognitive Map? Organizing Knowledge for Flexible Behavior.什么是认知图?用于灵活行为的知识组织。
Neuron. 2018 Oct 24;100(2):490-509. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.002.
7
The role of engram cells in the systems consolidation of memory.记忆系统巩固中记忆痕迹细胞的作用。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Aug;19(8):485-498. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0031-2.
8
Learning relative values in the striatum induces violations of normative decision making.纹状体中学习相对价值会导致违反规范决策。
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 20;8:16033. doi: 10.1038/ncomms16033.
9
Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action.儿茶酚胺能激发揭示了动机性(不)行动中不同的巴甫洛夫式和工具性机制。
Elife. 2017 May 15;6:e22169. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22169.
10
A map of abstract relational knowledge in the human hippocampal-entorhinal cortex.人类海马体-内嗅皮层中的抽象关系知识图谱。
Elife. 2017 Apr 27;6:e17086. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17086.