Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 疫情背景下使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂:回顾性分析。

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in context of COVID-19 outbreak: a retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, 100084, China.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan, 430030, China.

出版信息

Front Med. 2020 Oct;14(5):601-612. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0800-y. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

Abstract

The possible effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID-19 disease severity have generated considerable debate. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China, who had definite clinical outcome (dead or discharged) by February 15, 2020. Patients on anti-hypertensive treatment with or without ACEI/ARB were compared on their clinical characteristics and outcomes. The medical records from 702 patients were screened. Among the 101 patients with a history of hypertension and taking at least one anti-hypertensive medication, 40 patients were receiving ACEI/ARB as part of their regimen, and 61 patients were on antihypertensive medication other than ACEI/ARB. We observed no statistically significant differences in percentages of in-hospital mortality (28% vs. 34%, P = 0.46), ICU admission (20% vs. 28%, P = 0.37) or invasive mechanical ventilation (18% vs. 26%, P = 0.31) between patients with or without ACEI/ARB treatment. Further multivariable adjustment of age and gender did not provide evidence for a significant association between ACEI/ARB treatment and severe COVID-19 outcomes. Our findings confirm the lack of an association between chronic receipt of renin-angiotensin system antagonists and severe outcomes of COVID-19. Patients should continue previous anti-hypertensive therapy until further evidence is available.

摘要

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)对 COVID-19 疾病严重程度的可能影响引发了广泛争论。我们对中国武汉的住院成年 COVID-19 患者进行了单中心回顾性分析,这些患者的临床结局(死亡或出院)已于 2020 年 2 月 15 日确定。我们比较了接受抗高血压治疗且使用 ACEI/ARB 或未使用 ACEI/ARB 的患者的临床特征和结局。共筛选了 702 例患者的病历。在 101 例有高血压病史且至少服用一种降压药物的患者中,40 例患者接受 ACEI/ARB 治疗,61 例患者接受 ACEI/ARB 以外的降压药物治疗。我们观察到,在住院死亡率(28%比 34%,P = 0.46)、入住 ICU(20%比 28%,P = 0.37)或有创机械通气(18%比 26%,P = 0.31)方面,ACEI/ARB 治疗组与非 ACEI/ARB 治疗组之间无统计学差异。进一步对年龄和性别进行多变量调整也没有提供 ACEI/ARB 治疗与 COVID-19 严重结局之间存在显著关联的证据。我们的研究结果证实,慢性使用肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂与 COVID-19 的严重结局之间没有关联。在获得更多证据之前,患者应继续接受之前的抗高血压治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Stem cell therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia.新冠肺炎的干细胞治疗
Mol Biomed. 2022 Feb 17;3(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s43556-021-00067-8.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验