From the Department of Geriatrics, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China (G.Y., Z.T., L.P., J.L., J.C., S.H.).
Hubei Provincial Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China (G.Y., Z.T., L.P., J.L., J.C., S.H.).
Hypertension. 2020 Jul;76(1):51-58. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15143. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
With the capability of inducing elevated expression of ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2), the cellular receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or ACE inhibitors treatment may have a controversial role in both facilitating virus infection and reducing pathogenic inflammation. We aimed to evaluate the effects of ARBs/ACE inhibitors on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a retrospective, single-center study. One hundred twenty-six patients with COVID-19 and preexisting hypertension at Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Wuhan from January 5 to February 22, 2020, were retrospectively allocated to ARBs/ACE inhibitors group (n=43) and non-ARBs/ACE inhibitors group (n=83) according to their antihypertensive medication. One hundred twenty-five age- and sex-matched patients with COVID-19 without hypertension were randomly selected as nonhypertension controls. In addition, the medication history of 1942 patients with hypertension that were admitted to Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from November 1 to December 31, 2019, before the COVID-19 outbreak were also reviewed for external comparison. Epidemiological, demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, analyzed, and compared between these groups. The frequency of ARBs/ACE inhibitors usage in patients with hypertension with or without COVID-19 were comparable. Among patients with COVID-19 and hypertension, those received either ARBs/ACE inhibitors or non-ARBs/ACE inhibitors had comparable blood pressure. However, ARBs/ACE inhibitors group had significantly lower concentrations of hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; =0.049) and PCT (procalcitonin, =0.008). Furthermore, a lower proportion of critical patients (9.3% versus 22.9%; =0.061) and a lower death rate (4.7% versus 13.3%; =0.216) were observed in ARBs/ACE inhibitors group than non-ARBs/ACE inhibitors group, although these differences failed to reach statistical significance. Our findings thus support the use of ARBs/ACE inhibitors in patients with COVID-19 and preexisting hypertension.
血管紧张素转换酶 2(血管紧张素转换酶 2,用于严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2 的细胞受体)的功能是诱导其表达水平升高,血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂)或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗可能在促进病毒感染和减轻致病炎症方面具有争议性作用。我们旨在通过回顾性单中心研究评估血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的影响。2020 年 1 月 5 日至 2 月 22 日,湖北省中医院 126 例 COVID-19 合并高血压患者根据降压药物分为血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂组(n=43)和非血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂组(n=83)。随机选择 125 例年龄和性别匹配的 COVID-19 合并高血压患者作为非高血压对照组。此外,还回顾性分析了 2019 年 11 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间湖北省中医院收治的 1942 例高血压患者的药物治疗史,以进行外部比较。收集、分析和比较了这些组之间的流行病学、人口统计学、临床和实验室数据。高血压患者中血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用频率在 COVID-19 患者中与非 COVID-19 患者中相当。在患有 COVID-19 和高血压的患者中,接受血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或非血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的患者的血压相当。然而,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂组的 hs-CRP(高敏 C 反应蛋白)和 PCT(降钙素原)浓度明显较低(=0.049)。此外,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂组的危重症患者比例(9.3%比 22.9%;=0.061)和死亡率(4.7%比 13.3%;=0.216)均较低,但差异无统计学意义。因此,我们的研究结果支持在 COVID-19 合并高血压患者中使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。