• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PI-RADS v2 评分对高级别前列腺癌的预测价值:一项多中心回顾性研究。

The prediction value of PI-RADS v2 score in high-grade Prostate Cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.

Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.

出版信息

Int J Med Sci. 2020 May 30;17(10):1366-1374. doi: 10.7150/ijms.45730. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.7150/ijms.45730
PMID:32624693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7330665/
Abstract

To explore the prediction value of PI-RADS v2 in high-grade prostate cancer and establish a prediction model combined with related variables of prostate cancer. A total of 316 patients with newly discovered prostate cancer at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University and Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from December 2017 to August 2019 were enrolled in this study. The clinic information as age, tPSA, fPSA, prostate volume, Gleason score and PI-RADS v2 score have been collected. Univariate analysis was performed based on every variable to investigate the risk factors of high-grade prostate cancer. ROC curves were generated for the risk factors to distinguish the cut-off points. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the independent risk factors of high-grade prostate cancer. Nomogram prediction model was generated based on multivariate logistic regression analysis. The calibration curve, ROC curve, leave-one-out cross validation and independent external validation were performed to evaluate the discriminative ability, accuracy and stability of the nomogram prediction model. Of 316 patients, a total of 187 patients were diagnosed as high-grade prostate cancer. Univariate analysis showed tPSA, fPSA, prostate volume, PSAD and PI-RADS v2 score were significantly different between the high- and low-grade prostate cancer patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed only tPSA, prostate volume and PI-RADS v2 score were the independent risk factors of high-grade prostate cancer. The nomogram could predict the probability of high-grade prostate cancer, with a sensitivity of 79.4% and a specificity of 77.6%. The calibration curve displayed good agreement of the predicted probability with the actual observed probability. AUC of the ROC curve was 0.840 (0.797-0.884). Leave-one-out cross validation indicated the nomogram prediction model could classify 81.4% cases accurately. External data validation was performed with a sensitivity of 80.6% and a specificity of 77.3%, the Kappa value was 0.5755. PI-RADS v2 score had the value in predicting high-grade prostate cancer and the nomogram prediction model may help early diagnose the high risk prostate cancer.

摘要

探讨 PI-RADS v2 对高级别前列腺癌的预测价值,并建立联合前列腺癌相关变量的预测模型。

本研究纳入了 2017 年 12 月至 2019 年 8 月期间武汉大学中南医院和武汉大学人民医院新诊断为前列腺癌的 316 例患者。收集了患者的临床信息,包括年龄、tPSA、fPSA、前列腺体积、Gleason 评分和 PI-RADS v2 评分。基于每个变量进行单因素分析,探讨高级别前列腺癌的危险因素。绘制 ROC 曲线以确定危险因素的截断值。使用逻辑回归分析探讨高级别前列腺癌的独立危险因素。基于多因素逻辑回归分析生成列线图预测模型。通过校准曲线、ROC 曲线、内部留一交叉验证和独立外部验证评估列线图预测模型的区分能力、准确性和稳定性。

在 316 例患者中,共有 187 例患者被诊断为高级别前列腺癌。单因素分析显示,tPSA、fPSA、前列腺体积、PSAD 和 PI-RADS v2 评分在高级别和低级别前列腺癌患者之间有显著差异。单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析显示,只有 tPSA、前列腺体积和 PI-RADS v2 评分是高级别前列腺癌的独立危险因素。该列线图可以预测高级别前列腺癌的概率,灵敏度为 79.4%,特异性为 77.6%。校准曲线显示预测概率与实际观察概率具有良好的一致性。ROC 曲线的 AUC 为 0.840(0.797-0.884)。内部留一交叉验证表明,列线图预测模型可以准确分类 81.4%的病例。外部数据验证的灵敏度为 80.6%,特异性为 77.3%,Kappa 值为 0.5755。PI-RADS v2 评分对预测高级别前列腺癌有一定价值,列线图预测模型有助于早期诊断高危前列腺癌。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/f75f6e065c68/ijmsv17p1366g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/7bd8ff0dd885/ijmsv17p1366g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/630021a3f606/ijmsv17p1366g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/fa3a28d05860/ijmsv17p1366g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/f75f6e065c68/ijmsv17p1366g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/7bd8ff0dd885/ijmsv17p1366g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/630021a3f606/ijmsv17p1366g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/fa3a28d05860/ijmsv17p1366g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7428/7330665/f75f6e065c68/ijmsv17p1366g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The prediction value of PI-RADS v2 score in high-grade Prostate Cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.PI-RADS v2 评分对高级别前列腺癌的预测价值:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Int J Med Sci. 2020 May 30;17(10):1366-1374. doi: 10.7150/ijms.45730. eCollection 2020.
2
[Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版诊断评分在3.0T多参数磁共振成像联合前列腺特异性抗原密度用于前列腺癌的初步适用性评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 19;97(47):3693-3698. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.47.003.
3
Exploration of the diagnostic capacity of PSAMR combined with PI-RADS scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer and establishment and validation of the Nomogram prediction model.探讨 PSAMR 联合 PI-RADS 评分对临床显著前列腺癌的诊断能力,并建立和验证列线图预测模型。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;149(13):11309-11317. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05008-2. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
4
Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.基于多参数磁共振成像开发一种列线图,用于预测高级别前列腺癌,以减少前列腺特异性抗原灰色区域内不必要的活检。
BMC Med Imaging. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0184-x.
5
Development and external validation of a novel nomogram to predict prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA <10 ng/ml and PI-RADS v2.1 = 3 lesions.开发并验证一种新的列线图,用于预测 PSA<10ng/ml 且 PI-RADS v2.1=3 分的活检初筛阴性患者的前列腺癌。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(3):2560-2571. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5100. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
6
Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.开发一种结合多参数磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)相关参数的列线图,以提高不同区域临床显著性癌症的检测率。
Prostate. 2022 Apr;82(5):556-565. doi: 10.1002/pros.24302. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
The potential of a nomogram combined PI-RADS v2.1 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce unnecessary biopsies in prostate cancer diagnostics.列线图联合 PI-RADS v2.1 评分与超声造影在前列腺癌诊断中减少不必要活检的潜力。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;95(1138):20220209. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220209. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
8
PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像测量的PI-RADS v2和前列腺周围脂肪能够预测活检Gleason评分为3+3的前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后病理分级的提升。
Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;52(5-6):333-339. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1545799.
9
Developing a new PI-RADS v2-based nomogram for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer.开发一种基于PI-RADS v2的新型列线图以预测高级别前列腺癌。
Clin Radiol. 2017 Jun;72(6):458-464. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
10
The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADS v2)与多参数磁共振成像上前列腺周围脂肪厚度相结合以预测前列腺癌的存在。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 4;8(27):44040-44049. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17182.

引用本文的文献

1
A strategy to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients with tPSA >10 ng ml -1 and PI-RADS 1-3.一项针对总前列腺特异抗原(tPSA)>10 ng/ml且前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)为1-3级患者减少不必要前列腺活检的策略。
Asian J Androl. 2025 Jul 1;27(4):531-536. doi: 10.4103/aja202499. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature.基于MRI的影像组学模型在前列腺癌风险分层中的应用:当代文献的批判性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1128. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061128.
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Predictive Models for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Nomograms Predict Survival Advantages of Gleason Score 3+4 Over 4+3 for Prostate Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.列线图预测前列腺癌中Gleason评分3+4相对于4+3的生存优势:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Front Oncol. 2019 Jul 16;9:646. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00646. eCollection 2019.
2
Establishing a prediction model for prostate cancer bone metastasis.建立前列腺癌骨转移预测模型。
Int J Biol Sci. 2019 Jan 1;15(1):208-220. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.27537. eCollection 2019.
3
A novel nomogram for predicting ECE of prostate cancer.一种用于预测前列腺癌包膜外侵犯的新型列线图。
基于磁共振成像的临床显著性前列腺癌预测模型:一项系统评价。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 29;14(19):4747. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194747.
4
MRI determined prostate volume and the incidence of prostate cancer on MRI-fusion biopsy: a systemic review of reported data for the last 20 years.MRI测定的前列腺体积与MRI融合活检中前列腺癌的发病率:对过去20年报告数据的系统评价
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Dec;54(12):3047-3054. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03351-w. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
A novel robust nomogram based on peripheral monocyte counts for predicting lymph node metastasis of prostate cancer.一种基于外周血单核细胞计数的新型稳健列线图预测前列腺癌淋巴结转移。
Asian J Androl. 2021 Jul-Aug;23(4):409-414. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_89_20.
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):916-918. doi: 10.1111/bju.14503.
4
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.多参数磁共振成像预测高级别前列腺癌:改善鹿特丹欧洲前列腺癌筛查风险计算器研究的风险预测。
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
6
Incidence of metastasis and prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis in Gleason 3+4 versus 4+3 prostate cancer.Gleason 3+4与4+3前列腺癌诊断时的转移发生率及前列腺特异性抗原水平
Urol Ann. 2018 Apr-Jun;10(2):203-208. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_124_17.
7
Noninvasive Detection of High Grade Prostate Cancer by DNA Methylation Analysis of Urine Cells Captured by Microfiltration.微过滤法捕获尿液细胞的 DNA 甲基化分析对高级别前列腺癌的无创检测
J Urol. 2018 Oct;200(4):749-757. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.067. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options.临床局限性前列腺癌:AUA/ASTRO/SUO 指南。第 I 部分:风险分层、共同决策和治疗选择。
J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):683-690. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Characterization and stratification of prostate lesions based on comprehensive multiparametric MRI using detailed whole-mount histopathology as a reference standard.基于详细全器官病理作为参考标准的综合多参数 MRI 对前列腺病变的特征分析和分层。
NMR Biomed. 2017 Dec;30(12). doi: 10.1002/nbm.3796. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
10
Prediction of Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the ERSPC Risk Calculator in a Contemporary Dutch Clinical Cohort.前列腺癌预测:ERSPC 风险计算器在当代荷兰临床队列中的外部验证。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Mar;4(2):228-234. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Aug 4.