• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiram.活性物质福美双农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Jul 20;15(7):e04700. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4700. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifloxystrobin.活性物质肟菌酯农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Oct 20;15(10):e04989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4989. eCollection 2017 Oct.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance laminarin.活性物质海带多糖农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 9;15(6):e04836. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4836. eCollection 2017 Jun.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance milbemectin.活性物质米尔倍霉素农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 26;21(7):e08126. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8126. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mepanipyrim.活性物质嘧菌胺农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 13;15(6):e04852. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4852. eCollection 2017 Jun.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance zoxamide.活性物质唑菌胺酯的农药风险评估同行评审
EFSA J. 2017 Sep 25;15(9):e04980. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4980. eCollection 2017 Sep.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metconazole.活性物质甲环唑农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2023 Aug 24;21(8):e08141. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8141. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fosetyl.活性物质霜霉威农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 3;16(7):e05307. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5307. eCollection 2018 Jul.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance captan.活性成分克菌丹农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2020 Sep 11;18(9):e06230. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6230. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cyazofamid.活性物质氰霜唑农药风险评估的更新同行评审。
EFSA J. 2020 Sep 4;18(9):e06232. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6232. eCollection 2020 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effective and Facile Fabrication of a Tattoo Paper-Based SERS Substrate and Its Application in Pesticide Sensing on Fruit Surfaces.一种基于纹身纸的具有成本效益且简便的表面增强拉曼散射(SERS)基底的制备及其在水果表面农药传感中的应用
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;13(3):486. doi: 10.3390/nano13030486.
2
Organic and Conventional Bean Pesticides in Development of Autochthonous Strains.本地菌株发育过程中的有机和传统豆类杀虫剂
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Jun 3;8(6):603. doi: 10.3390/jof8060603.
3
Review of the existing maximum residue levels for thiram according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.根据欧盟法规(EC)No 396/2005第12条对福美双现有最大残留限量的审查。
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 29;19(1):e06391. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6391. eCollection 2021 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).关于植物保护产品对蜜蜂( 、 属及独居蜂)风险评估的修订指南
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products.植保产品风险评估中操作人员、工人、居民和旁观者暴露评估指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7032. eCollection 2022 Jan.

活性物质福美双农药风险评估的同行评审。

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiram.

出版信息

EFSA J. 2017 Jul 20;15(7):e04700. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4700. eCollection 2017 Jul.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4700
PMID:32625536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7010066/
Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State France and co-rapporteur Member State Belgium for the pesticide active substance thiram are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of thiram as a fungicide on apple, pear, cherry, strawberry, peach and maize. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)对报告成员国法国和共同报告成员国比利时的主管当局就农药活性物质福美双开展的初始风险评估进行同行评审后的结论已公布。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号所要求的。这些结论是在对福美双作为杀菌剂在苹果、梨、樱桃、草莓、桃子和玉米上的代表性用途进行评估的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求提供但缺失的信息。识别出了相关问题。