Bragard Claude, Dehnen-Schmutz Katharina, Gonthier Paolo, Jacques Marie-Agnès, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Thulke Hans-Hermann, van der Werf Wopke, Vicent Civera Antonio, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Candresse Thierry, Lacomme Christophe, Bottex Bernard, Oplaat Carla, Roenhorst Annelien, Schenk Martijn, Di Serio Francesco
EFSA J. 2020 Jan 9;18(1):e05853. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5853. eCollection 2020 Jan.
Following a request from the EU Commission, the Panel on Plant Health has addressed the pest categorisation of those viruses and viroids (hereafter referred to as viruses) of and other tuber-forming spp. (hereafter referred to as potato) which are considered to be either non-EU or of undetermined standing based on a previous EFSA opinion. These viruses belong to different families and genera and either have an established identity or produce consistent symptoms. Plants for planting is the main pathway for entry for all categorised viruses as they can all be transmitted by vegetative propagation. Several categorised viruses have a relatively wide host range and/or are vector-transmitted, increasing the potential for entry. The information currently available on geographical distribution, biology, epidemiology, impact and potential entry pathways has been evaluated with regard to the criteria to qualify as potential Union quarantine pest or as Union regulated non-quarantine pest (RNQP). Since this opinion addresses specifically the non-EU potato viruses, in general these viruses do not meet the criteria assessed by EFSA to qualify as potential Union regulated non-quarantine pests. The following viruses meet the criteria to qualify as potential Union quarantine pest: APLV, APMMV, APMoV, ChiLCV, CYSDV, PAMV, PBRSV, PVH, PVP, PVT, PYDV, PYMV, PYV, PYVV, RCVMV, SALCV, SB26/29, ToCV, ToLCNDV, ToMHaV, ToMoTV, ToSRV and ToYVSV. With the exception of the criterion regarding the potential for consequences in the EU territory, for which the Panel is unable to conclude because of lack of information, AVB, CPSbV, PaLCrV, PapMV, PVB, PVU, SB41 and TVBMV meet all the other criteria to qualify as potential Union quarantine pest. PotLV and WPMV do not qualify as potential Union quarantine pest, since they are not reported to have any impact. For most of the categorised viruses, the conclusions of the Panel have inherent uncertainties, due to the lack of quantitative data on their impact and/or absence or limited availability of information on the biology, epidemiology and geographical distribution.
应欧盟委员会的要求,植物健康小组对根据欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)先前的意见被视为非欧盟或状况不明的茄属植物及其他块茎类茄属物种(以下简称马铃薯)的病毒和类病毒(以下简称病毒)进行了有害生物分类。这些病毒属于不同的科和属,要么具有确定的身份,要么会产生一致的症状。种植用植物是所有分类病毒进入的主要途径,因为它们都可以通过营养繁殖传播。几种分类病毒具有相对广泛的寄主范围和/或通过媒介传播,增加了进入的可能性。目前可获得的关于地理分布、生物学、流行病学、影响和潜在进入途径的信息已根据作为潜在欧盟检疫性有害生物或欧盟管制的非检疫性有害生物(RNQP)的标准进行了评估。由于本意见专门涉及非欧盟马铃薯病毒,总体而言,这些病毒不符合EFSA评估的作为潜在欧盟管制的非检疫性有害生物的标准。以下病毒符合作为潜在欧盟检疫性有害生物的标准:苹果潜隐类病毒(APLV)、苹果花叶病毒(APMMV)、苹果脉明病毒(APMoV)、中国番茄黄化曲叶病毒(ChiLCV)、黄瓜黄化斑驳病毒(CYSDV)、马铃薯A病毒(PAMV)、马铃薯B病毒(PBRSV)、马铃薯重花叶病毒(PVH)、马铃薯卷叶病毒(PVP)、马铃薯纺锤块茎类病毒(PVT)、马铃薯Y病毒(PYDV)、马铃薯Y脉坏死病毒(PYMV)、马铃薯Y病毒(PYV)、马铃薯Y病毒V株系(PYVV)、菜豆金色花叶病毒(RCVMV)、番茄黄化曲叶病毒(SALCV)、南芥菜花叶病毒(SB26/29)、番茄褪绿病毒(ToCV)、番茄黄化曲叶病毒(ToLCNDV)、番茄花叶病毒(ToMHaV)、番茄斑驳病毒(ToMoTV)、番茄潜隐核糖核酸病毒(ToSRV)和番茄黄化脉带病毒(ToYVSV)。除了关于在欧盟境内可能产生后果的标准外,由于缺乏信息,小组无法得出结论,苹果褪绿叶斑病毒(AVB)、黄瓜绿斑驳花叶病毒(CPSbV)、辣椒轻斑驳病毒(PaLCrV)、木瓜花叶病毒(PapMV)、马铃薯V病毒(PVB)、马铃薯U病毒(PVU)、南芥菜花叶病毒(SB41)和烟草花叶病毒(TVBMV)符合作为潜在欧盟检疫性有害生物的所有其他标准。马铃薯潜隐病毒(PotLV)和马铃薯脉花叶病毒(WPMV)不符合作为潜在欧盟检疫性有害生物的标准,因为没有报告它们有任何影响。对于大多数分类病毒,由于缺乏关于其影响的定量数据和/或关于生物学、流行病学和地理分布的信息缺失或有限,小组的结论存在内在的不确定性。