• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

算法变更协议在自适应机器学习医疗器械的监管中。

Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices.

机构信息

Ada Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Else Kröner-Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 26;23(10):e30545. doi: 10.2196/30545.

DOI:10.2196/30545
PMID:34697010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8579211/
Abstract

One of the greatest strengths of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches in health care is that their performance can be continually improved based on updates from automated learning from data. However, health care ML models are currently essentially regulated under provisions that were developed for an earlier age of slowly updated medical devices-requiring major documentation reshape and revalidation with every major update of the model generated by the ML algorithm. This creates minor problems for models that will be retrained and updated only occasionally, but major problems for models that will learn from data in real time or near real time. Regulators have announced action plans for fundamental changes in regulatory approaches. In this Viewpoint, we examine the current regulatory frameworks and developments in this domain. The status quo and recent developments are reviewed, and we argue that these innovative approaches to health care need matching innovative approaches to regulation and that these approaches will bring benefits for patients. International perspectives from the World Health Organization, and the Food and Drug Administration's proposed approach, based around oversight of tool developers' quality management systems and defined algorithm change protocols, offer a much-needed paradigm shift, and strive for a balanced approach to enabling rapid improvements in health care through AI innovation while simultaneously ensuring patient safety. The draft European Union (EU) regulatory framework indicates similar approaches, but no detail has yet been provided on how algorithm change protocols will be implemented in the EU. We argue that detail must be provided, and we describe how this could be done in a manner that would allow the full benefits of AI/ML-based innovation for EU patients and health care systems to be realized.

摘要

人工智能 (AI) 和机器学习 (ML) 在医疗保健中的最大优势之一是,它们的性能可以根据从数据中自动学习的更新不断改进。然而,医疗保健 ML 模型目前基本上是根据为更新缓慢的医疗设备制定的规定进行监管的——这需要对模型进行重大的文档重塑和重新验证,而这些模型是由 ML 算法生成的。这对于偶尔重新训练和更新的模型来说只是小问题,但对于那些将实时或接近实时从数据中学习的模型来说则是大问题。监管机构已经宣布了对监管方法进行根本性变革的行动计划。在这篇观点文章中,我们考察了这一领域的现行监管框架和发展情况。审查了现状和最新进展,并认为这些针对医疗保健的创新方法需要与针对监管的创新方法相匹配,这些方法将为患者带来益处。世界卫生组织(WHO)和美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的提议方法提供了国际视角,这些方法围绕着对工具开发者质量管理体系的监督和定义算法变更协议展开,提供了急需的范式转变,并努力在通过人工智能创新实现医疗保健快速改进的同时,确保患者安全。欧盟(EU)的监管框架草案表明了类似的方法,但尚未就如何在欧盟实施算法变更协议提供细节。我们认为必须提供详细信息,并描述如何以一种允许欧盟患者和医疗保健系统充分受益于 AI/ML 创新的方式来实现这一点。

相似文献

1
Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices.算法变更协议在自适应机器学习医疗器械的监管中。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 26;23(10):e30545. doi: 10.2196/30545.
2
Learning From Experience and Finding the Right Balance in the Governance of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health Technologies.从经验中学习,在人工智能和数字健康技术的治理中找到正确的平衡。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 14;25:e43682. doi: 10.2196/43682.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Addressing health disparities in the Food and Drug Administration's artificial intelligence and machine learning regulatory framework.解决食品和药物管理局人工智能和机器学习监管框架中的健康差异问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):2016-2019. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa133.
5
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL DEVICES: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE.医疗设备中的人工智能:过去、现在与未来。
Psychiatr Danub. 2021 May;33(Suppl 3):S336-S341.
6
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Brief Literature Review.人工智能在急性冠状动脉综合征中的应用:简要文献综述
Adv Ther. 2021 Oct;38(10):5078-5086. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01908-2. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
7
Artificial intelligence in medical device software and high-risk medical devices - a review of definitions, expert recommendations and regulatory initiatives.人工智能在医疗器械软件和高风险医疗器械中的应用——定义、专家建议和监管举措的综述。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Jun;20(6):467-491. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2184685. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
An Open Science Approach to Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.医疗保健领域人工智能的开放科学方法。
Yearb Med Inform. 2019 Aug;28(1):47-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677898. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
9
Prediction of Dental Implants Using Machine Learning Algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测种植牙。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jun 20;2022:7307675. doi: 10.1155/2022/7307675. eCollection 2022.
10
A framework for the oversight and local deployment of safe and high-quality prediction models.安全且高质量预测模型的监督和本地部署框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1631-1636. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac078.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Emergency Medicine: Balancing Opportunities and Challenges.人工智能与急诊医学:机遇与挑战的平衡
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 13;13:e70903. doi: 10.2196/70903.
2
Machine learning enables legal risk assessment in internet healthcare using HIPAA data.机器学习可利用《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)数据对互联网医疗中的法律风险进行评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13720-x.
3
A decade of review in global regulation and research of artificial intelligence medical devices (2015-2025).全球人工智能医疗设备监管与研究十年回顾(2015 - 2025年)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 17;12:1630408. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1630408. eCollection 2025.
4
Letter to the Editor on "From Concept to Clinic: Living Labs and Regulatory Sandboxes for Health System Digitalization and the Integration of Innovative Devices Into Clinical Workflows".致编辑的信:关于“从概念到临床:用于卫生系统数字化及将创新设备整合到临床工作流程的生活实验室和监管沙盒”
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2025 Mar 31;13:214-215. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2025.3557508. eCollection 2025.
5
A roadmap for safe, regulation-compliant Living Labs for AI and digital health development.人工智能与数字健康发展安全且合规的生活实验室路线图。
Sci Adv. 2025 May 16;11(20):eadv7719. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adv7719. Epub 2025 May 14.
6
Continuous Improvement of Digital Health Applications Linked to Real-World Performance Monitoring: Safe Moving Targets?与真实世界性能监测相关的数字健康应用的持续改进:安全的移动目标?
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Jun 25;1(3):276-287. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.05.010. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Integrating Ethical Principles Into the Regulation of AI-Driven Medical Software.将伦理原则融入人工智能驱动的医疗软件监管之中。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 23;17(2):e79506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79506. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Pathology in the artificial intelligence era: Guiding innovation and implementation to preserve human insight.人工智能时代的病理学:引领创新与实践以保留人类洞察力。
Acad Pathol. 2025 Feb 28;12(1):100166. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2025.100166. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
9
CORE-MD clinical risk score for regulatory evaluation of artificial intelligence-based medical device software.用于基于人工智能的医疗设备软件监管评估的CORE-MD临床风险评分
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 6;8(1):90. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01459-8.
10
A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices.对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的人工智能医疗设备报告漏洞的范围审查。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 3;7(1):273. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01270-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulatory responses to medical machine learning.对医疗机器学习的监管回应。
J Law Biosci. 2020 Apr 11;7(1):lsaa002. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa002. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients.在住院患者中验证广泛实施的专有脓毒症预测模型的外部有效性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1065-1070. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626.
3
Periodic Manual Algorithm Updates and Generalizability: A Developer's Response. Comment on "Evaluation of Four Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Self-Diagnosis Apps on Three Diagnoses: Two-Year Follow-Up Study".定期人工算法更新与通用性:开发者回应。对“三种诊断下四款人工智能辅助自我诊断应用程序的评估:两年随访研究”的评论
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 16;23(6):e26514. doi: 10.2196/26514.
4
Continual learning in medical devices: FDA's action plan and beyond.医疗器械的持续学习:美国食品药品监督管理局的行动计划及其他
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jun;3(6):e337-e338. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00076-5. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
5
How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices.机器学习如何嵌入以支持临床医生决策:对 FDA 批准的医疗设备的分析。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Apr;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100301.
6
How medical AI devices are evaluated: limitations and recommendations from an analysis of FDA approvals.医学人工智能设备的评估方式:基于对美国食品药品监督管理局批准情况分析的局限性与建议
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):582-584. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01312-x.
7
Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices in the USA and Europe (2015-20): a comparative analysis.美国和欧洲对人工智能和基于机器学习的医疗器械的审批(2015-20):比较分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Mar;3(3):e195-e203. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30292-2. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Recommendations for the safe, effective use of adaptive CDS in the US healthcare system: an AMIA position paper.美国医疗保健系统中自适应 CDS 安全有效使用的建议:AMIA 立场文件。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):677-684. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa319.
9
The European artificial intelligence strategy: implications and challenges for digital health.欧盟人工智能战略:对数字健康的影响和挑战。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jul;2(7):e376-e379. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30112-6. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database.基于人工智能且获美国食品药品监督管理局批准的医疗设备及算法的现状:一个在线数据库。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 11;3:118. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0. eCollection 2020.