Suppr超能文献

利用专家共识对英国的动物福利问题进行优先排序。

Prioritisation of animal welfare issues in the UK using expert consensus.

机构信息

Jeanne Marchig international Centre for Animal Welfare Education, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Jeanne Marchig international Centre for Animal Welfare Education, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

出版信息

Vet Rec. 2020 Dec 19;187(12):490. doi: 10.1136/vr.105964. Epub 2020 Jul 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The welfare of all animals under human management is an area of consistent public concern, but strategies to improve welfare may vary across species. In this study, expert consensus, using a modified Delphi approach, was used to prioritise welfare issues of farmed and companion animals in the UK.

METHODS

The study involved 117 experts, divided between eight species groups. Experts were recruited from a broad range of disciplines. Two rounds of online surveys were conducted using the online survey tool, and the final round was an in-person workshop with a subsection of experts (n=21). The experts agreed that welfare issues should be ranked considering three categories: (1) severity, (2) duration and (3) perceived prevalence.

RESULTS

A comprehensive list of welfare issues was generated for each species by discussion boards (cats, rabbits and horses) or by literature review (dogs, pigs, poultry, cattle and small ruminants). In the first online survey, the experts scored each welfare issue using the three categories (severity, duration and prevalence) on a 6-point Likert scale, where 1=never/none and 6=always/high. Lists of welfare issues were reduced to 25 per cent-59 per cent of the total number, by determining mean ranks from expert ratings. In round 2, experts were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with the rankings. In the final stage, during the workshop, the top-ranking welfare issues for animals were determined for individual animals (considering the greatest severity and duration, in the expert's opinion) and for perceived prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, prioritised welfare issues included lack of knowledge of welfare needs, social behaviour issues, problem behaviours, inappropriate diet and environment, lack of veterinary care, consequences from breeding decisions, poor pain management, delayed euthanasia and chronic ill health. The Delphi process resulted in consensus on the most significant welfare challenges of animals in the UK and can help to guide future research and education priority decisions.

摘要

背景

在人类管理下的所有动物的福利是一个持续受到公众关注的领域,但改善福利的策略可能因物种而异。在这项研究中,使用改良的 Delphi 方法,专家共识用于确定英国养殖和伴侣动物的福利问题的优先顺序。

方法

该研究涉及 117 名专家,分为八个物种组。专家来自广泛的学科领域。使用在线调查工具进行了两轮在线调查,最后一轮是与部分专家(n=21)进行的现场研讨会。专家们一致认为,应该根据以下三个类别来对福利问题进行排名:(1)严重程度,(2)持续时间和(3)感知普遍性。

结果

通过讨论板(猫、兔子和马)或文献综述(狗、猪、家禽、牛和小反刍动物)为每个物种生成了一份全面的福利问题清单。在第一轮在线调查中,专家使用 6 分李克特量表(1=从不/无,6=总是/高)对每个福利问题进行了严重程度、持续时间和普遍性的三个类别的评分。通过专家评分的平均排名,将福利问题清单减少到总问题数的 25%-59%。在第二轮中,专家被要求对排名表示同意或不同意。在最后阶段,即研讨会期间,根据专家的意见,确定了个体动物(考虑最大的严重程度和持续时间)和感知普遍性的动物的顶级福利问题。

结论

总体而言,优先考虑的福利问题包括对福利需求的了解不足、社交行为问题、行为问题、不适当的饮食和环境、缺乏兽医护理、繁殖决策的后果、疼痛管理不善、延迟安乐死和慢性健康问题。Delphi 过程就英国动物面临的最重大的福利挑战达成了共识,可以帮助指导未来的研究和教育重点决策。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Objective pain assessment in horses (2014-2018).马匹的客观疼痛评估(2014 - 2018年)
Vet J. 2018 Dec;242:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Acute pain in cats: Recent advances in clinical assessment.猫的急性疼痛:临床评估的最新进展
J Feline Med Surg. 2019 Jan;21(1):25-34. doi: 10.1177/1098612X18808103. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
10
Short communication: Detection of lameness in dairy cows using a grooming device.简讯:使用梳理设备检测奶牛跛行。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Feb;101(2):1511-1517. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13207. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验