Emergency Surgery Committee, European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES), Pölten, Austria.
Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01433-x. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
Acute complications of biliary calculi are common, morbid, and complex to manage. Variability exists in the techniques utilized to treat these conditions at an individual surgeon and unit level.
To identify, through an international prospective nonrandomized cohort study, the epidemiology and areas of practice variability in management of acute complicated calculous biliary disease (ACCBD) and to correlate them against reported outcomes.
A preplanned analysis of the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) 2018 Complicated Biliary Calculous Disease audit was performed. Patients undergoing emergency hospital admission with ACCBD between 1 October 2018 and 31 October 2018 were included. All eligible patients with acute complicated biliary calculous disease were recorded contemporaneously using a standardized predetermined protocol and a secure online database and followed-up through to 60 days from their admission.
A two-stage data collection strategy collecting patient demographics, details of operative, endoscopic and radiologic intervention, and outcome metrics. Outcome measures included mortality, surgical morbidity, ICU stay, timing of operative intervention, and length of hospital stay.
Three hundred thirty-eight patients were included, with a mean age of 65 years and 54% were female. Diagnosis at admission were: cholecystitis (45.6%), biliary pancreatitis (21%), choledocholithiasis with and without cholangitis (13.9% and 18%). Index admission cholecystectomy was performed in just 50% of cases, and 28% had an ERCP performed. Morbidity and mortality were low.
This first ESTES snapshot audit, a purely descriptive collaborative study, gives rich 'real world' insights into local variability in surgical practice as compared to international guidelines, and how this may impact upon outcomes. These granular data will serve to improve overall patient care as well as being hypothesis generating and inform areas needing future prospective study.
胆石症的急性并发症常见且复杂,难以处理。在个体外科医生和单位层面上,用于治疗这些疾病的技术存在差异。
通过一项国际前瞻性非随机队列研究,确定急性复杂胆石病(ACCBD)管理中的流行病学和实践变异性领域,并将其与报告的结果相关联。
对欧洲创伤和急诊外科学会(ESTES)2018 年复杂胆石病审核进行了预先计划的分析。纳入 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 10 月 31 日期间因 ACCBD 紧急住院的患者。所有符合条件的急性复杂胆石病患者均使用标准化预定方案和安全在线数据库进行同期记录,并随访至入院后 60 天。
采用两阶段数据收集策略,收集患者人口统计学信息、手术、内镜和放射学干预以及结局指标的详细信息。结局指标包括死亡率、手术发病率、重症监护病房停留时间、手术干预时机和住院时间。
共纳入 338 例患者,平均年龄为 65 岁,女性占 54%。入院时的诊断为:胆囊炎(45.6%)、胆源性胰腺炎(21%)、胆总管结石伴或不伴胆管炎(13.9%和 18%)。仅 50%的病例在入院时进行了胆囊切除术,28%的病例进行了 ERCP。发病率和死亡率较低。
这是首次 ESTES 快照审核,是一项纯粹描述性的合作研究,为外科实践中的局部变异性提供了丰富的“真实世界”见解,与国际指南相比,以及这可能如何影响结局。这些详细数据将有助于提高整体患者护理水平,同时为未来的前瞻性研究生成假设并提供信息。