Liu C L, Lo C M, Fan S T
Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.
World J Surg. 1997 Feb;21(2):149-54. doi: 10.1007/s002689900207.
Acute biliary pancreatitis is a serious complication of biliary calculous disease and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis has been the focus of discussion in recent years. In addition, the exact role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis has not yet been fully defined. In this report, we evaluated a protocol of emergency ERCP (within 24 hours) for predicted severe attacks, early ERCP (within 72 hours) for predicted mild attacks, and interval LC for management of acute biliary pancreatitis. Between January 1992 and June 1995 a total of 75 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis were managed according to the protocol. Bedside ultrasonography at admission diagnosed 94% of all 64 patients with gallbladder stones, but the sensitivity of visualizing choledocholithiasis was low (19%). Forty-five (60%) of them were predicted to have a severe attack by either Ranson or glucose/urea criteria. Emergency ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for identifiable common bile duct (CBD) or ampullary stones were performed on all patients predicted to have a severe attack within 24 hours from presentation. An early endoscopic procedure was performed on all patients predicted to have a mild attack within 72 hours from presentation. ERCP was successful in 95% of all patients, and CBD stones were detected in 52 (69%) of them. ES and stone clearance were successful in all of these 52 patients. The morbidity associated with the endoscopic procedure was 3%, and there were no deaths. All except one patient survived the attack of acute pancreatitis, resulting in an overall mortality of 1%. Interval LC was performed on 46 patients with a conversion rate of 4%. The median postoperative hospital stay after LC was 2 days, and there was no major intraoperative or postoperative morbidity or mortality. Our experience suggests that the policy of emergency ERCP for patients with predicted severe disease, early ERCP for patients with predicted mild disease, and interval LC are associated with favorable outcomes in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. Acute biliary pancreatitis can be managed safely and effectively by a combined endoscopic and laparoscopic approach.
急性胆源性胰腺炎是胆石症的一种严重并发症,与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。近年来,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)在急性胆源性胰腺炎治疗中的作用一直是讨论的焦点。此外,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)在急性胆源性胰腺炎治疗中的确切作用尚未完全明确。在本报告中,我们评估了针对预测为重症发作的患者采用急诊ERCP(24小时内)、针对预测为轻症发作的患者采用早期ERCP(72小时内)以及采用间隔期LC治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的方案。1992年1月至1995年6月期间,共有75例急性胆源性胰腺炎患者按照该方案进行治疗。入院时的床边超声检查确诊了64例胆囊结石患者中的94%,但可视化胆总管结石的敏感性较低(19%)。其中45例(60%)根据兰森或血糖/尿素标准被预测为重症发作。对所有预测为重症发作的患者在就诊后24小时内进行急诊ERCP及针对可识别的胆总管(CBD)或壶腹结石的内镜括约肌切开术(ES)。对所有预测为轻症发作的患者在就诊后72小时内进行早期内镜操作。所有患者中95%的ERCP成功,其中52例(69%)检测到CBD结石。这52例患者的ES及结石清除均成功。内镜操作相关的发病率为3%,无死亡病例。除1例患者外,所有患者均在急性胰腺炎发作后存活,总体死亡率为1%。46例患者接受了间隔期LC,转换率为4%。LC术后中位住院时间为2天,术中及术后无重大发病率或死亡率。我们的经验表明,针对预测为重症疾病的患者采用急诊ERCP、针对预测为轻症疾病的患者采用早期ERCP以及间隔期LC的策略与急性胆源性胰腺炎患者的良好预后相关。急性胆源性胰腺炎可通过内镜和腹腔镜联合方法安全有效地进行治疗。