Piletz John E, Drivon Jennifer, Eisenga John, Buck Will, Yen Sabrina, McLin Megan, Meruvia William, Amaral Carolina, Brue Kellie
Department of Biology, Mississippi College, Clinton, MS, USA.
Cell Med. 2018 Jun 6;10:2155179018755140. doi: 10.1177/2155179018755140. eCollection 2018.
Safety concerns over cell-derived pharmaceutical products being manufactured in supplements of fetal bovine serum (FBS) have ignited pleas to replace FBS. Herein, four newly marketed alternatives to FBS were compared: a xeno-free product called Cell-Ess®, a human platelet lysate marketed as GroPro®, and two mixtures of adult bovine serum varying in their proportions of neonatal growth factors, called Liporo® and FetalGro®. An endothelial cell line (C2BBe1) and a neuronal cell line (SHSY5Y) near confluency in media with 10% FBS were selectively scraped and taken through a 25-day step-wise algorithm to replace FBS, and another human endothelial cell line (HRA-19) was studied to replicate C2BBe1. Cells were stained, counted, and compared for viability, migration, and spheroids. The C2BBe1 and HRA-19 cell lines failed to proliferate in 10% Cell-Ess® but grew in 10% GroPro® or 10% FetalGro® reasonably well compared to reference 10% FBS. With SH-SY5Y, only FetalGro® approached FBS's efficacy. These were all inferior to 11 different branded lots of FBS (positive controls), but five days into switching just amongst the FBS brands, 4 of 11 supported less proliferation than reference FBS in endothelial HRA-19 ( < 0.004). Moreover, neurospheres were enriched in two branded lots of FBS and FetalGro® (each < 0.004), neurospheres being an unwanted phenotype for any neuronal cell application. Because platelet-derived GroPro® stood out amongst the non-FBS growth supplements to allow proliferation without inducing spheroids, it seems the best (mindful that the cells still grew slower in it compared to FBS). While no perfect replacement was found amongst the alternatives to FBS, the algorithm for switching should be useful in future testing of new alternatives to FBS as the need arises to switch from FBS and expand pharmaceutical products with safety for human use.
对在胎牛血清(FBS)补充剂中生产的细胞衍生药物产品的安全担忧引发了替换FBS的呼吁。在此,对四种新上市的FBS替代品进行了比较:一种名为Cell-Ess®的无动物源产品、一种名为GroPro®的人血小板裂解物,以及两种成年牛血清混合物,它们的新生生长因子比例不同,分别称为Liporo®和FetalGro®。在含有10% FBS的培养基中接近汇合的内皮细胞系(C2BBe1)和神经元细胞系(SHSY5Y)被选择性刮除,并通过一个25天的逐步算法来替换FBS,同时研究另一种人内皮细胞系(HRA-19)以复制C2BBe1。对细胞进行染色、计数,并比较其活力、迁移和球体形成情况。C2BBe1和HRA-19细胞系在10%的Cell-Ess®中未能增殖,但与参考的10% FBS相比,在10%的GroPro®或10%的FetalGro®中生长情况较好。对于SH-SY5Y细胞,只有FetalGro®接近FBS的功效。这些都不如11种不同品牌批次的FBS(阳性对照),但在内皮细胞HRA-19中,仅在FBS品牌之间切换五天后,11种中有4种支持的增殖比参考FBS少(<0.004)。此外,在两种品牌批次的FBS和FetalGro®中神经球增多(均<0.004),对于任何神经元细胞应用来说,神经球都是一种不需要的表型。由于源自血小板的GroPro®在非FBS生长补充剂中脱颖而出,能够允许细胞增殖而不诱导球体形成,所以它似乎是最好的(请注意,与FBS相比,细胞在其中生长仍然较慢)。虽然在FBS的替代品中没有找到完美的替代品,但随着从FBS转换并扩大对人类使用安全的药品的需求出现,这种切换算法在未来对FBS新替代品的测试中应该会很有用。