Suppr超能文献

不同年龄单侧唇腭裂患者牙齿发育年龄的评估

Evaluation of Dental Age in Individuals of Different Ages with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

作者信息

Cesur Emre, Arslan Can, Münevveroğlu Aslı Patır, Altuğ Ayşe Tuba

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Medipol University School of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey.

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Medipol University School of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2020 May 18;33(2):103-109. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19094. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the dental age of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients aged 7-12 and 12-16 years using Demirjian's method and to compare these results with a control group.

METHODS

We evaluated the panoramic radiographs of 54 individuals with UCLP and 54 age- and gender-matched individuals without UCLP (control). The UCLP and control groups were divided into two groups: 7-12 and 12-16 years of age. Their dental ages were determined using Demirjian's method. Dental ages of the cleft side and noncleft side were assessed separately and were also compared with those of the control group to assess potential asymmetric dental developments in the UCLP group.

RESULTS

The chronological age was lower than the dental ages on both right and left sides in the control group (p<0.01). When age groups were evaluated separately, it was found that the chronological age was lower than the dental age in 7-12 year old individuals in the UCLP group (p<0.05), whereas it was less than the left and right dental ages in 7-12 (p<0.01) and 12-16 year old individuals (p<0.05) in the control group.

CONCLUSION

We detected no differences in dental age between UCLP patients and healthy controls, and lack of asymmetrical dental development in the mandibular teeth of either group. However, based on assessments performed using Demirjian's method, subjects' dental and chronological ages were incompatible.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用德米尔坚方法评估7至12岁以及12至16岁单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者的牙龄,并将结果与对照组进行比较。

方法

我们评估了54例UCLP患者和54例年龄及性别匹配的非UCLP患者(对照组)的全景X线片。UCLP组和对照组分为两组:7至12岁组和12至16岁组。使用德米尔坚方法确定他们的牙龄。分别评估腭裂侧和非腭裂侧的牙龄,并与对照组进行比较,以评估UCLP组潜在的不对称牙齿发育情况。

结果

对照组的实际年龄低于左右两侧的牙龄(p<0.01)。当分别评估年龄组时,发现UCLP组7至12岁个体的实际年龄低于牙龄(p<0.05),而对照组7至12岁(p<0.01)和12至16岁个体(p<0.05)的实际年龄低于左右牙龄。

结论

我们未发现UCLP患者与健康对照组在牙龄上存在差异,且两组下颌牙齿均无不对称牙齿发育情况。然而,基于使用德米尔坚方法进行的评估,受试者的牙龄与实际年龄不相符。

相似文献

4
Dental maturation of unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇腭裂的牙齿发育
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;2(2):158-62. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.101345.
6
Mandibular and maxillary asymmetry in individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇腭裂患者的下颌与上颌不对称
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997 May;34(3):232-9. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0232_mamaii_2.3.co_2.

本文引用的文献

4
Dental maturation of unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇腭裂的牙齿发育
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;2(2):158-62. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.101345.
5
Accuracy of different dental age estimation methods on Turkish children.不同牙齿年龄评估方法在土耳其儿童中的准确性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Mar 10;216(1-3):61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.08.018. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
8
Dental anomalies as part of the cleft spectrum.作为腭裂谱系一部分的牙齿异常。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 Jul;45(4):414-9. doi: 10.1597/07-064.1. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
9
Dental development of Chinese children with cleft lip and palate.中国唇腭裂儿童的牙齿发育
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 May;45(3):289-96. doi: 10.1597/07-019.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验