Nelson Jennifer, Sorensen Elizabeth W, Mintri Shrutika, Rabideau Amy E, Zheng Wei, Besin Gilles, Khatwani Nikhil, Su Stephen V, Miracco Edward J, Issa William J, Hoge Stephen, Stanton Matthew G, Joyal John L
Moderna Inc., 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 24;6(26):eaaz6893. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6893. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Messenger RNA (mRNA) represents an attractive therapeutic modality for potentially a wide range of clinical indications but requires uridine chemistry modification and/or tuning of the production process to prevent activation of cellular innate immune sensors and a concomitant reduction in protein expression. To decipher the relative contributions of these factors on immune activation, here, we compared, in multiple cell and in vivo models, mRNA that encodes human erythropoietin incorporating either canonical uridine or 1-methyl-pseudouridine (1mΨ), synthesized by either a standard process shown to have double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) impurities or a modified process that yields a highly purified mRNA preparation. Our data demonstrate that the lowest stimulation of immune endpoints was with 1mΨ made by the modified process, while mRNA containing canonical uridine was immunostimulatory regardless of process. These findings confirm that uridine modification and the reduction of dsRNA impurities are both necessary and sufficient at controlling the immune-activating profile of therapeutic mRNA.
信使核糖核酸(mRNA)对于广泛的潜在临床适应症而言是一种有吸引力的治疗方式,但需要尿苷化学修饰和/或调整生产工艺,以防止激活细胞固有免疫传感器并随之降低蛋白质表达。为了解析这些因素对免疫激活的相对贡献,在此,我们在多种细胞和体内模型中比较了编码人促红细胞生成素的mRNA,该mRNA掺入了标准尿苷或1-甲基-假尿苷(1mΨ),其合成方式要么是显示有双链RNA(dsRNA)杂质的标准工艺,要么是能产生高度纯化mRNA制剂的改良工艺。我们的数据表明,免疫终点的最低刺激是由改良工艺制备的1mΨ引起的,而含有标准尿苷的mRNA无论采用何种工艺都具有免疫刺激作用。这些发现证实,尿苷修饰和减少dsRNA杂质对于控制治疗性mRNA的免疫激活特性而言既是必要的也是充分的。