Jeong Jae-Han, Pyo Jung-Soo, Kim Nae-Yu, Kang Dong-Wook
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chosun University Hospital, Chosun University School of Medicine, Gwangju 61453, Korea.
Department of Pathology, Daejeon Eulji University Hospial, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35233, Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Jul 6;10(7):460. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10070460.
The present study aims to evaluate the diagnostic roles of various immunohistochemical (IHC) markers in thymic tumors, including thymic carcinoma (TC) and thymoma (TM). Eligible studies were obtained by searching the PubMed databases and screening the searched articles. Thirty-eight articles were used in the present meta-analysis and included 636 TCs and 1861 TMs. Besides, for IHC markers with statistical significance, a diagnostic test accuracy review was performed. The comparison of various IHC expressions between TC and TM was performed for 32 IHC markers. Among these IHC markers, there were significant differences between TC and TM for beta-5t, B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), calretinin, CD1a, CD5, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin19 (CK19), CD117, glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1), insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), mesothelin, MOC31, mucin1 (MUC1), p21, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT). Markers with higher expressions in TCs were Bcl-2, calretinin, CD5, CEA, CD117, Glut-1, IGF-1R, mesothelin, MOC31, MUC1, and p21. Among these markers, there were no significant differences between TC and TM type B3 in immunohistochemistries for Bcl-2 and CK19. On the other hand, -catenin and CD205 showed a considerable difference in IHC expressions between TC and TM type B3, but not between TC and overall TM. In diagnostic test accuracy review, MUC1 and beta-5t were the most useful markers for TC and TM, respectively. : Taken together, our results showed that the expression rates for various IHC markers significantly differed between TC and TM. The IHC panel can be useful for differentiation from limited biopsied specimens in daily practice.
本研究旨在评估各种免疫组织化学(IHC)标志物在胸腺肿瘤中的诊断作用,包括胸腺癌(TC)和胸腺瘤(TM)。通过检索PubMed数据库并筛选检索到的文章来获取符合条件的研究。本荟萃分析使用了38篇文章,包括636例胸腺癌和1861例胸腺瘤。此外,对于具有统计学意义的IHC标志物,进行了诊断试验准确性评估。对32种IHC标志物进行了胸腺癌和胸腺瘤之间各种IHC表达的比较。在这些IHC标志物中,β-5t、B细胞淋巴瘤2(Bcl-2)、钙视网膜蛋白、CD1a、CD5、癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19(CK19)、CD117、葡萄糖转运蛋白1(Glut-1)、胰岛素样生长因子1受体(IGF-1R)、间皮素、MOC31、粘蛋白1(MUC1)、p21和末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶(TdT)在胸腺癌和胸腺瘤之间存在显著差异。在胸腺癌中表达较高的标志物有Bcl-2、钙视网膜蛋白、CD5、CEA、CD117、Glut-1、IGF-1R、间皮素、MOC31、MUC1和p21。在这些标志物中,Bcl-2和CK19的免疫组织化学在胸腺癌和B3型胸腺瘤之间没有显著差异。另一方面,β-连环蛋白和CD205在胸腺癌和B3型胸腺瘤之间的IHC表达存在显著差异,但在胸腺癌和总体胸腺瘤之间没有差异。在诊断试验准确性评估中,MUC1和β-5t分别是胸腺癌和胸腺瘤最有用的标志物。综上所述,我们的结果表明,各种IHC标志物的表达率在胸腺癌和胸腺瘤之间存在显著差异。在日常实践中,IHC检测有助于从有限的活检标本中进行鉴别诊断。