• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于二分类响应的最优平均处理效应估计的倾向评分规范。

Propensity score specification for optimal estimation of average treatment effect with binary response.

机构信息

Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3623-3640. doi: 10.1177/0962280220934847. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1177/0962280220934847
PMID:32640934
Abstract

Propensity score methods are commonly used in statistical analyses of observational data to reduce the impact of confounding bias in estimations of average treatment effect. While the propensity score is defined as the conditional probability of a subject being in the treatment group given that subject's covariates, the most precise estimation of average treatment effect results from specifying the propensity score as a function of true confounders and predictors only. This property has been demonstrated via simulation in multiple prior research articles. However, we have seen no theoretical explanation as to why this should be so. This paper provides that theoretical proof. Furthermore, this paper presents a method for performing the necessary variable selection by means of elastic net regression, and then estimating the propensity scores so as to obtain optimal estimates of average treatment effect. The proposed method is compared against two other recently introduced methods, outcome-adaptive lasso and covariate balancing propensity score. Extensive simulation analyses are employed to determine the circumstances under which each method appears most effective. We applied the proposed methods to examine the effect of pre-cardiac surgery coagulation indicator on mortality based on a linked dataset from a retrospective review of 1390 patient medical records at Jewish Hospital (Louisville, KY) with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

摘要

倾向评分方法常用于观察性数据分析中,以减少在估计平均治疗效果时混杂偏差的影响。虽然倾向评分被定义为给定个体协变量的情况下个体被分配到治疗组的条件概率,但从指定倾向评分仅作为真实混杂因素和预测因素的函数中得出平均治疗效果的最精确估计。这一特性已在多篇先前的研究文章中通过模拟得到证明。然而,我们没有看到任何理论解释为什么应该如此。本文提供了理论证明。此外,本文提出了一种通过弹性网络回归进行必要变量选择的方法,然后估计倾向评分,以获得平均治疗效果的最佳估计。所提出的方法与最近引入的两种方法进行了比较,即结果自适应套索和协变量平衡倾向评分。通过广泛的模拟分析,确定了每种方法在哪些情况下最有效。我们应用所提出的方法,根据来自犹太医院(肯塔基州路易斯维尔)的 1390 例患者病历的回顾性研究与胸外科医生协会数据库的链接数据集,研究了术前凝血指标对死亡率的影响。

相似文献

1
Propensity score specification for optimal estimation of average treatment effect with binary response.基于二分类响应的最优平均处理效应估计的倾向评分规范。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3623-3640. doi: 10.1177/0962280220934847. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.结果自适应套索:用于因果推断的变量选择
Biometrics. 2017 Dec;73(4):1111-1122. doi: 10.1111/biom.12679. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.通过倾向得分方法控制混杂因素可能会导致条件AUC的估计出现偏差:一项模拟研究。
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):568-582. doi: 10.1002/pst.1948. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Propensity Score-Based Estimators With Multiple Error-Prone Covariates.基于倾向得分的多易错协变量估计量。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 1;188(1):222-230. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy210.
5
Propensity score analysis methods with balancing constraints: A Monte Carlo study.带平衡约束的倾向评分分析方法:一项蒙特卡罗研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Apr;30(4):1119-1142. doi: 10.1177/0962280220983512. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?倾向评分分析与部分观测协变量:应如何使用多重插补?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/0962280217713032. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
7
Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.基于倾向得分法估计平均治疗效果及治疗组中的平均治疗效果:一项比较研究。
Biom J. 2017 Sep;59(5):967-985. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600094. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.不同倾向评分方法估计边缘风险比的性能。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
9
Variable selection for causal mediation analysis using LASSO-based methods.基于 LASSO 的方法进行因果中介分析的变量选择。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1413-1427. doi: 10.1177/0962280221997505. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
10
Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure.比较处理二分类暴露因素倾向性评分估计中协变量缺失的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01053-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Statistical methods for assessing drug interactions using observational data.使用观察性数据评估药物相互作用的统计方法。
J Appl Stat. 2022 Sep 20;51(2):298-323. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2022.2123460. eCollection 2024.
2
Directed Acyclic Graph Assisted Method For Estimating Average Treatment Effect.用于估计平均治疗效果的有向无环图辅助方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Mar;35(2):187-206. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2296047. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
3
Personalized treatment selection using observational data.使用观察数据进行个性化治疗选择。
J Appl Stat. 2022 Jan 5;50(5):1115-1127. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.2019689. eCollection 2023.