Souza Anne D, Vaswani Vina
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Head of Forensic Medicine Department, Centre for Ethics, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (Deemed to Be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, India.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jun 27;56:178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.028. eCollection 2020 Aug.
There are diverse methods to teach medical ethics, and there is no single accepted approach towards its learning and assessment. The authors aim to explore the various strategies practised to teach undergraduate medical students the fundamentals of medical ethics and their evaluation. The authors reviewed the articles published from January 2014 to September 2019. The authors searched PubMed for the relevant publications and extracted the information using a data extraction sheet. Twenty-nine articles were included for the review, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Case-based discussions were a widely accepted strategy to learn ethics. The studies highlighted a mixed teaching approach using multiple teaching tools. A qualitative approach was preferred for the assessment through reflections, simulated patient interactions, and development of portfolios. However, there are gaps in the existing literature on the assessment strategies for ethics education. Heterogeneity still exists in the planning of the curricula, teaching, and assessment methods. These curricula suit the cultural and religious set up of that particular country. Case-based discussion is a popular teaching strategy, and there exist numerous innovative and cost-effective active teaching strategies. There is a need for studies that are more rigorous to address the evaluation of the ethics curricula. This review would help educators to choose their preferred approach based on their teaching environment.
教授医学伦理学有多种方法,对于其学习和评估没有单一被广泛认可的方法。作者旨在探讨教授本科医学生医学伦理学基础知识及其评估所采用的各种策略。作者回顾了2014年1月至2019年9月发表的文章。作者在PubMed上搜索相关出版物,并使用数据提取表提取信息。纳入29篇文章进行综述,这些文章符合纳入标准。基于案例的讨论是一种广泛认可的学习伦理学的策略。研究强调了使用多种教学工具的混合教学方法。通过反思、模拟患者互动和档案袋的建立进行评估时,定性方法更受青睐。然而,现有文献在伦理学教育评估策略方面存在空白。课程规划、教学和评估方法仍存在异质性。这些课程适合特定国家的文化和宗教背景。基于案例的讨论是一种流行的教学策略,并且存在许多创新且具有成本效益的主动教学策略。需要开展更严谨的研究来解决伦理学课程的评估问题。本综述将帮助教育工作者根据其教学环境选择他们偏爱的方法。