Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Department of Biosciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1195-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03424-z. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
To evaluate the influence of self-reported physical activity and sleep quality on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the orofacial region.
Ninety healthy participants aged 18-50 years old were evenly distributed according to the level of physical activity into low, moderate, and high level. The classification of physical activity was based on modified criteria of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), considering intensity, duration, and frequency of physical activity. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assessed sleep quality and the individuals were then classified as good or poor sleepers. CPM was assessed using the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the anterior temporalis as test stimulus and hand immersion in hot water as conditioning stimulus. ANOVA was applied to the data and Tukey's posttest was applied when the main effects or interactions were significant (p < 0.050).
There was no significant main effect of neither physical activity nor sleep quality on pain modulation. However, individuals who reported high level of physical activity and good quality of sleep had a greater pain modulation (- 0.60 ± 0.34) when compared with those who reported moderate (- 0.10 ± 0.25) and low level of physical activity (- 0.10 ± 0.52) and good sleep quality (p < 0.028).
Pain modulation seems to be more efficient in individuals who report a good sleep quality and a high level of physical activity.
Conditioned pain modulation is highly variable in healthy people. Therefore, a multifactorial approach should be taken into consideration in the evaluation of the efficacy of endogenous analgesia.
评估自我报告的身体活动和睡眠质量对口腔面部区域条件性疼痛调节(CPM)的影响。
90 名年龄在 18-50 岁的健康参与者根据身体活动水平均匀分为低、中、高水平。身体活动的分类基于国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)的修改标准,考虑了体力活动的强度、持续时间和频率。匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估睡眠质量,然后将个体分为睡眠良好或睡眠质量差的人群。CPM 使用前颞肌的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)作为测试刺激和手部浸入热水作为条件刺激来评估。对数据进行 ANOVA 分析,当主效应或交互作用显著时(p < 0.050),应用 Tukey 事后检验。
身体活动和睡眠质量都没有对疼痛调节产生显著的主要影响。然而,与报告中等水平(-0.10±0.25)和低水平(-0.10±0.52)身体活动以及睡眠质量良好的个体相比,报告高水平身体活动和良好睡眠质量的个体的疼痛调节更大(-0.60±0.34)(p<0.028)。
报告睡眠质量良好和身体活动水平高的个体的疼痛调节似乎更有效。
在健康人群中,条件性疼痛调节具有高度可变性。因此,在评估内源性镇痛的疗效时,应考虑多因素方法。