Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jul-Aug;25(4):556-565. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1794084. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
Programs that seek to avoid emergency department (ED) visits from patients residing in long-term care facilities are increasing. We sought to identify existing programs where allied healthcare personnel are the primary providers of the intervention and, to evaluate their effectiveness and safety.
We systematically searched Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE with terms relating to long-term care, emergency services, hospitalization and allied health personnel. We reviewed 11,176 abstracts and included 22 studies in our narrative synthesis, which we grouped by intervention category.
We found five categories of interventions including: 1) use of advanced practice nursing; 2) a program called Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT); 3) end-of-life care; 4) condition specific interventions; and 5) use of extended care paramedics. Among studies measuring that outcome, 13/13 reported a decrease in ED visits, and 16/17 reported a decrease hospitalization in the intervention groups. Patient adverse events such as functional status and relapse were seldom reported (6/22) as were measures of emergency system function such as crowding/inability of paramedics to transfer care to the ED (1/22). Only 4/22 studies evaluated patient mortality and 3/4 found a non-statistically significant worsening.
We found five types of programs/interventions which all demonstrated a decrease in ED visits or hospitalization. However, most studies were observational and few assessed patient safety. Many identified programs focused on increased primary care for patients, and interventions addressing acute care issues, such as community paramedics, deserve more study.
旨在避免长期护理机构患者前往急诊部(ED)就诊的项目正在增加。我们旨在确定现有的项目,其中联合医疗保健人员是干预措施的主要提供者,并评估其有效性和安全性。
我们系统地搜索了 Medline、CINAHL 和 EMBASE,使用了与长期护理、急诊服务、住院和联合医疗保健人员相关的术语。我们审查了 11,176 篇摘要,并将 22 项研究纳入我们的叙述性综合分析,我们根据干预类别对其进行了分组。
我们发现了五类干预措施,包括:1)使用高级实践护理;2)名为“减少急性护理转移干预措施”(INTERACT)的计划;3)临终关怀;4)特定疾病的干预措施;5)使用扩展护理护理人员。在衡量这一结果的研究中,13/13 报告 ED 就诊减少,16/17 报告干预组住院减少。患者不良事件(如功能状态和复发)很少被报告(6/22),紧急系统功能的措施(如护理人员拥挤/无法将护理转至 ED)也很少被报告(1/22)。只有 4/22 项研究评估了患者死亡率,其中 3/4 发现无统计学意义的恶化。
我们发现了五种类型的项目/干预措施,它们都表明 ED 就诊或住院人数减少。然而,大多数研究都是观察性的,很少有研究评估患者安全性。许多已确定的项目都侧重于增加对患者的初级保健,并且干预急性护理问题(如社区护理人员)值得更多研究。