• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现场医护人员和辅助医疗人员针对减少长期护理患者急诊就诊的治疗干预措施的安全性和有效性的系统评价方案。

The safety and efficacy of on-site paramedic and allied health treatment interventions targeting the reduction of emergency department visits by long-term care patients: systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Ottawa Paramedic Service, 2465 Don Reid Dr, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1E2, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa at The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 23;7(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0868-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-018-0868-5
PMID:30470243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6260877/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults are more likely to access the emergency department, which suffers from overcrowding and congestion, for conditions that could potentially be treated in other settings. Older adults living in long-term care centers have access to healthcare resources in their residence, and several programs have been created with the intent of treating medical conditions on-site. The aim of this study is to identify and systematically review programs and interventions at long-term care centers that aim to treat patients on-site, avoiding unscheduled transportation to the emergency department.

METHODS

We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We will perform a comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , PROSPERO, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials using a broad search strategy. Two independent reviewers will assess titles and abstracts against inclusion criteria, and we will further evaluate relevant full-text articles for inclusion. We will assess the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for included non-randomized studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials. We will present a narrative synthesis of results and complete a meta-analysis only if enough homogeneity is found. We will create funnel plots to evaluate possible reporting bias and use The Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to assess the confidence in cumulative evidence.

DISCUSSION

As pressure on the healthcare system continues to rise, many areas are looking for alternative models of care. Several programs have been put in place in long-term care centers that seek to avoid transportation to the emergency department by providing enhanced care on-site. These programs are quite variable, and, to date, there is no standardized program or model of care.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ( CRD42018091636 ).

摘要

背景

老年人更有可能因潜在可在其他环境中治疗的疾病而前往经常人满为患的急诊部门。居住在长期护理中心的老年人可以在其居住的地方获得医疗资源,并且已经创建了几个旨在现场治疗医疗条件的项目。本研究的目的是确定并系统地审查长期护理中心旨在现场治疗患者的项目和干预措施,避免无计划地将患者送往急诊部门。

方法

我们将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。我们将使用广泛的搜索策略,在 Embase、MEDLINE、CINAHL、ClinicalTrials.gov、PROSPERO 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册处对 Embase、MEDLINE、CINAHL、ClinicalTrials.gov、PROSPERO 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册处进行全面搜索。两名独立评审员将根据纳入标准评估标题和摘要,并进一步评估相关的全文文章是否纳入。我们将使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa scale)评估非随机研究的偏倚风险,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(Cochrane Risk of Bias tool)评估随机试验的偏倚风险。我们将呈现结果的叙述性综合,并仅在发现足够同质性时进行荟萃分析。我们将创建漏斗图来评估可能存在的报告偏倚,并使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法学来评估累积证据的置信度。

讨论

随着医疗保健系统的压力持续上升,许多地区正在寻找替代的护理模式。在长期护理中心已经实施了几个项目,旨在通过提供现场强化护理来避免送往急诊部门。这些项目差异很大,到目前为止,还没有标准化的项目或护理模式。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO(CRD42018091636)。

相似文献

1
The safety and efficacy of on-site paramedic and allied health treatment interventions targeting the reduction of emergency department visits by long-term care patients: systematic review protocol.现场医护人员和辅助医疗人员针对减少长期护理患者急诊就诊的治疗干预措施的安全性和有效性的系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 23;7(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0868-5.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The Safety and Effectiveness of On-Site Paramedic and Allied Health Treatment Interventions Targeting the Reduction of Emergency Department Visits by Long-Term Care Patients: Systematic Review.现场护理人员和联合健康治疗干预对减少长期护理患者急诊就诊的安全性和有效性:系统评价。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jul-Aug;25(4):556-565. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1794084. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis.社区居住老年人跌倒及跌倒相关伤害的预防:一项基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(2):1-78. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
7
Interventions to improve emergency department use for mental health reasons: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.干预措施以改善因心理健康原因而使用急诊科:一项混合方法系统评价的方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 3;8(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1008-6.
8
Community paramedicine-cost-benefit analysis and safety with paramedical emergency services in rural areas: scoping review protocol.社区 paramedicine——农村地区辅助医疗急救服务的成本效益分析与安全性:范围审查方案。 (注:“paramedicine”可能是一个特定专业术语,结合语境推测这里可理解为辅助医疗相关内容,但确切意思可能因专业领域不同而有差异)
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e038651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038651.
9
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的心力衰竭专科管理:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
10
Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医疗保健专业人员慢性伤口管理的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488. doi: 10.2196/12488.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative care models for paramedic patients from long-term care centers: a national survey of Canadian paramedic services.长期护理中心的护理人员患者的替代护理模式:对加拿大护理服务的全国调查。
CJEM. 2023 Apr;25(4):344-352. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00471-9. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
2
Perceptions and experiences of residents and relatives of emergencies in care homes: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative research.养老院内急症患者及其家属的认知和体验:系统评价和定性研究的元综合分析。
Age Ageing. 2021 Nov 10;50(6):1925-1934. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab182.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of an Intervention to Reduce Hospitalizations From Nursing Homes: A Randomized Implementation Trial of the INTERACT Program.一项减少疗养院住院率干预措施的效果:INTERACT 项目的随机实施试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1257-1264. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2657.
2
Care by design: New model of coordinated on-site primary and acute care in long-term care facilities.精心设计的护理:长期护理机构中协调的现场初级和急性护理新模式。
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Mar;61(3):e129-34.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
4
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
5
Ambulance diversion and emergency department offload delay: resource document for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statement.救护车转院和急诊部门卸荷延迟:美国急诊医师学会立场声明的资源文件。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):555-61. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.608871.
6
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.GRADE 指南:5. 评估证据质量——发表偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
7
Bringing back the house call: how an emergency mobile nursing service is reducing avoidable emergency department visits for residents in long-term care homes.恢复上门问诊服务:一项紧急移动护理服务如何减少长期护理机构居民可避免的急诊就诊情况。
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2011 Apr;24(1):59-71. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2011.22335.
8
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias).GRADE 指南:4. 评估证据质量——研究局限性(偏倚风险)。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
9
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.GRADE 指南:3. 评估证据质量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
10
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南:1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.