Kumawat Vijay, Goyal Manu, Marimuthu Palniappan
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Citizens Hospital, Nallagandla, Serilingampally, Hyderabad, 500019 India.
Transfusion Medicine & Haematology, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, 560029 India.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2020 Jul;36(3):542-549. doi: 10.1007/s12288-020-01266-z. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
The apheresis platelets are the preferred blood components for the thrombocytopenic hemato-oncology patients. The one of the important factors for post transfusion increment is the dose of the platelet product infused. The minimum platelet product yield is defined but the amount of maximum possible platelets collection from a single donor is not universally defined. There is lots of apprehension in our country for apheresis procedures harvesting more than a standard unit. This retrospective observational study was conducted to determine safety of high yield plateletapheresis collection among Indian donors This retrospective observational study was conducted for a period of 15 months including all consecutive plateletapheresis procedures. The informed consent had been obtained from all donors including high yield plateletapheresis (Yield ≥ 5 × 10). The apheresis product was subjected to platelet count. The donor adverse reactions were recorded along with procedural details. Post procedure complete blood count was done for the donors who consented for post procedure blood sample draw A total 569 procedures were performed during this period including 174 high yield procedure. The 526 procedures were analyzed for adverse donor reactions. The 43 were excluded for adverse donor reaction analysis due to yield less than 3 × 10 ( = 43). The adverse reactions rate between high yield procedures (18/174, 10.34%) and normal yield (20/352, 5.68%) were not statistically different ( = 0.052). The phlebotomy related complication (3.23%) followed by citrate toxicity (2.28%) were the two most common adverse reaction observed. The adverse reactions associated with high yield plateletapheresis procedures are comparable to normal yield procedures in term of overall adverse reactions observed and post procedural platelet counts. This can be beneficial to patients by providing products of greater yield.
单采血小板是血液肿瘤性血小板减少患者的首选血液成分。输血后血小板增加的一个重要因素是输注的血小板制品剂量。血小板制品的最低产量有明确规定,但单个供体可能采集的最大血小板量尚无统一规定。在我国,人们对采集超过标准单位的单采程序存在诸多担忧。本回顾性观察研究旨在确定印度供体中高产单采血小板采集的安全性。本回顾性观察研究为期15个月,纳入了所有连续的单采血小板程序。已获得所有供体的知情同意,包括高产单采血小板(产量≥5×10)。对单采制品进行血小板计数。记录供体不良反应及操作细节。对同意术后采集血样的供体进行术后全血细胞计数。在此期间共进行了569次操作,其中包括174次高产操作。对526次操作进行了供体不良反应分析。43次操作因产量低于3×10(=43)被排除在供体不良反应分析之外。高产操作组(18/174,10.34%)与正常产量组(20/352,5.68%)的不良反应发生率无统计学差异(=0.052)。观察到的两种最常见不良反应是静脉穿刺相关并发症(3.23%)和枸橼酸盐毒性(2.28%)。就观察到的总体不良反应和术后血小板计数而言,高产单采血小板程序相关的不良反应与正常产量程序相当。通过提供更高产量的制品,这可能对患者有益。