用被动抬腿试验预测液体反应性：不要被腹腔内高压误导！ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Predicting fluid responsiveness with the passive leg raising test: don't be fooled by intra-abdominal hypertension!

作者信息

Minini Andrea, Abraham Paul, Malbrain Manu L N G

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Jette, Belgium.

Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Hôpital Edouard-Herriot, Lyon cedex, France.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):799. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.14.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2019.12.14

PMID:32647724

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7333095/

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Predicting fluid responsiveness with the passive leg raising test: don't be fooled by intra-abdominal hypertension!用被动抬腿试验预测液体反应性：不要被腹腔内高压误导！

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):799. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.14.

Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Is Responsible for False Negatives to the Passive Leg Raising Test.腹腔内高压导致被动抬腿试验出现假阴性。

Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):e639-e647. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003808.

The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.被动抬腿试验不能准确预测腹腔内高压患者的液体反应性。

Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1824-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eb3c21.

Supine transfer test-induced changes in cardiac index predict fluid responsiveness in patients without intra-abdominal hypertension.仰卧位转移试验诱导的心输出量指数变化可预测无腹腔内高压患者的液体反应性。

BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02280-0.

Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance.被动抬腿和呼气末阻断试验在呼吸系统顺应性低的患者中比脉压变异度更好。

Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):152-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f08d7.

The role of passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in pediatric intensive care unit patients.被动抬腿试验预测儿科重症监护病房患者液体反应性的作用。

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 May;13(3):e155-60. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182388ab3.

Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.被动抬腿试验可预测严重脓毒症或急性胰腺炎合并自主呼吸患者的液体反应性。

Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):819-25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c8fe7a.

Ultrasonographic caval indices do not significantly contribute to predicting fluid responsiveness immediately after coronary artery bypass grafting when compared to passive leg raising.与被动抬腿相比，超声心动图下腔静脉指数对冠状动脉旁路移植术后即刻液体反应性的预测并无显著贡献。

Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016 Jun 8;14(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12947-016-0065-4.

Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring and Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness to Passive Leg Raising.非侵入式血压监测与被动抬腿时液体反应性预测。

Am J Crit Care. 2018 May;27(3):228-237. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018867.

Accuracy of Passive Leg Raising Test in Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Children.被动抬腿试验预测儿童液体反应性的准确性

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 May;24(5):344-349. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23432.

引用本文的文献

Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?液体反应性的预测。有什么新进展？

Ann Intensive Care. 2022 May 28;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8.

Non-Invasive Multimodal Neuromonitoring in Non-Critically Ill Hospitalized Adult Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非重症住院成年 COVID-19 患者的非侵入性多模态神经监测：一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 14;13:814405. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.814405. eCollection 2022.

Early Effects of Passive Leg-Raising Test, Fluid Challenge, and Norepinephrine on Cerebral Autoregulation and Oxygenation in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients.被动抬腿试验、液体负荷试验和去甲肾上腺素对新型冠状病毒肺炎危重症患者脑自动调节和氧合的早期影响

Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 16;12:674466. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.674466. eCollection 2021.

Fluid administration and monitoring in ARDS: which management?ARDS 中的液体管理和监测：哪种管理方式？

Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2252-2264. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06310-0. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Is Responsible for False Negatives to the Passive Leg Raising Test.腹腔内高压导致被动抬腿试验出现假阴性。

Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):e639-e647. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003808.

Ventilation in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension: what every critical care physician needs to know.腹腔内高压患者的通气：每位重症监护医生都需要了解的知识。

Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0522-y.

Estimating mean circulatory filling pressure in clinical practice: a systematic review comparing three bedside methods in the critically ill.临床实践中平均循环充盈压的估计：一项比较危重症患者三种床旁方法的系统评价

Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Jun 20;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0418-2.

Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D's and the four phases of fluid therapy.脓毒性休克中液体管理与监护的原则：是时候考虑四个“D”及液体治疗的四个阶段了。

Ann Intensive Care. 2018 May 22;8(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0402-x.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动：脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南：2016 年版。

Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

The neglected role of abdominal compliance in organ-organ interactions.腹部顺应性在器官间相互作用中被忽视的作用。

Crit Care. 2016 Mar 16;20:67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1220-x.

Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.被动抬腿预测液体反应性：系统评价和荟萃分析。

Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1935-1947. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4134-1. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

Predicting Fluid Responsiveness by Passive Leg Raising: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Clinical Trials.被动抬腿预测液体反应性：23项临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):981-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001556.

What every ICU clinician needs to know about the cardiovascular effects caused by abdominal hypertension.每位重症监护病房临床医生都需要了解的关于腹腔高压引起的心血管效应的知识。

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):388-99. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0028. Epub 2015 May 14.

Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey?脉压变异的适用性：有多少种灰色地带？

Crit Care. 2015 Mar 25;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0869-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验