Brooks Nathan A, Kokorovic Andrea, McGrath John S, Kassouf Wassim, Collins Justin W, Black Peter C, Douglas James, Djaladat Hooman, Daneshmand Siamak, Catto James W F, Kamat Ashish M, Williams Stephen B
Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
World J Urol. 2022 Jun;40(6):1325-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03341-6. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented across a variety of disciplines to improve outcomes. Herein we describe the impact of ERAS on quality of life (QOL) and cost for patients undergoing urologic oncology surgery.
A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Clinictrials.gov, and Cochrane Review databases for studies published between 1946 and 2020 was conducted. Articles were reviewed and assigned a risk of bias by two authors and were included if they addressed ERAS and either QOL or cost-effectiveness for patients undergoing urologic oncology surgery.
The literature search yielded a total of 682 studies after removing duplicates, of which 10 (1.5%) were included in the review. Nine articles addressed radical cystectomy, while one addressed ERAS and QOL for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Six publications assessed the impact of ERAS on QOL domains. Questionnaires used for assessment of QOL varied across studies, and timing of administration was heterogeneous. Overall, ERAS improved patient QOL during early phases of recovery within the realms of bowel function, physical/social/cognitive functioning, sleep and pain control. Costs were assessed in 4 retrospective studies including 3 conducted in the United States and one from China all addressing radical cystectomy. Studies demonstrated either decreased costs associated with ERAS as a result of decreased length of stay or no change in cost based on ERAS implementation.
While limited studies are published on the subject, ERAS implementation for radical cystectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy improved patient-reported QOL during early phases of recovery. For radical cystectomy, there was a decreased or neutral overall financial cost associated with ERAS. Further studies assessing QOL and cost-effectiveness over the entire global period of care in a variety of urologic oncology surgeries are warranted.
已在多个学科实施了术后加速康复(ERAS)方案以改善治疗效果。在此,我们描述了ERAS对接受泌尿外科肿瘤手术患者的生活质量(QOL)和成本的影响。
使用MEDLINE、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov和Cochrane综述数据库对1946年至2020年发表的研究进行了系统的文献检索。由两位作者对文章进行评审并评估偏倚风险,若文章涉及ERAS以及接受泌尿外科肿瘤手术患者的生活质量或成本效益,则将其纳入。
去除重复项后,文献检索共得到682项研究,其中10项(1.5%)被纳入综述。9篇文章涉及根治性膀胱切除术,1篇涉及腹腔镜肾切除术的ERAS和生活质量。6篇出版物评估了ERAS对生活质量领域的影响。不同研究中用于评估生活质量的问卷各不相同,给药时间也不一致。总体而言,ERAS在肠道功能、身体/社会/认知功能、睡眠和疼痛控制等恢复早期阶段改善了患者的生活质量。在4项回顾性研究中评估了成本,其中3项在美国进行,1项来自中国,均涉及根治性膀胱切除术。研究表明,由于住院时间缩短,ERAS相关成本降低,或者基于ERAS的实施成本没有变化。
虽然关于该主题的研究有限,但根治性膀胱切除术和腹腔镜肾切除术实施ERAS可在恢复早期改善患者报告的生活质量。对于根治性膀胱切除术,ERAS相关的总体财务成本降低或保持中性。有必要进一步开展研究,评估各种泌尿外科肿瘤手术在整个全球护理期间的生活质量和成本效益。