• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparative study of patients' satisfaction with different levels of hospitals in Beijing: why do patients prefer high-level hospitals?北京市不同级别医院间患者满意度的对比研究:患者为何偏爱高水平医院?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 10;20(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05507-9.
2
The willingness of patients to make the first visit to primary care institutions and its influencing factors in Beijing medical alliances: a comparative study of Beijing's medical resource-rich and scarce regions.北京医疗联盟中患者首次就诊于基层医疗机构的意愿及其影响因素:北京医疗资源丰富与稀缺地区的比较研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4184-0.
3
Comparative Study on the Satisfaction of Healthcare Service Providers with the Synergistic Development of Rural Healthcare Systems in China: Medical Alliance Counties vs. Non-Medical Alliance Counties.中国农村医疗体系协同发展中医疗服务提供者满意度的比较研究:医联体县与非医联体县
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jun 20;24(2):26. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7677. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
4
Does Descending Resources Reform Improve Patient Satisfaction and Reshape Choice of Care Providers? A Cross-Sectional Study in Zhejiang, China.下行资源改革是否提高了患者满意度并重塑了医疗服务提供者的选择?来自中国浙江的一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020956899. doi: 10.1177/0046958020956899.
5
Patients' satisfaction with HIV and AIDS care in Anambra State, Nigeria.尼日利亚阿南布拉州艾滋病毒和艾滋病护理的患者满意度。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0206499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206499. eCollection 2018.
6
Patients' Satisfaction after Primary Health Care Centers' Integration with Ministry of Health Hospitals, Jeddah.患者对初级医疗保健中心与卫生部医院整合后的满意度,吉达。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(2):135-142. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.190522.001.
7
Medical staff evaluation on 'the effect of medical alliance policy on hierarchical diagnosis and treatment'.医务人员对“医联体政策对分级诊疗效果的评价”。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 15;12:1366100. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1366100. eCollection 2024.
8
Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study.中国县级公立医院患者体验评价:一项多中心、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 14;9(11):e034225. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034225.
9
Patients' satisfaction with clinical Laboratory Services in Public Hospitals in Ethiopia.患者对埃塞俄比亚公立医院临床实验室服务的满意度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 3;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4880-9.
10
Associations between hospital characteristics and patient satisfaction in Germany.德国医院特征与患者满意度的关联
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):593-600. doi: 10.1111/hex.12485. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with the Utilization of Out-of-Region Medical Institutions for Brain Diseases.与脑部疾病患者选择外地医疗机构就医相关的因素
Yonsei Med J. 2025 Sep;66(9):599-608. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2024.0510.
2
Patient satisfaction with ambulatory care services delivery and respect for patient rights: findings from 2022 national survey in Rwanda.患者对门诊护理服务提供的满意度及对患者权利的尊重:卢旺达2022年全国调查结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12596-x.
3
Patient awareness and attitudes towards minimally invasive surgery.患者对微创手术的认知与态度。
Bioinformation. 2024 Nov 5;20(11):1641-1644. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001641. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessment of Pregnant Women's Satisfaction With the Model of Care Initiative: Antenatal Care Services at Primary Health Care Centers in the Qassim Health Cluster, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯卡西姆卫生集群初级保健中心孕妇对护理模式倡议满意度的评估:产前护理服务
Cureus. 2024 Dec 25;16(12):e76383. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76383. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on the utilization of hospital services and development of optimal pandemic control strategy in Chinese tertiary hospitals during the Omicron wave.2019年冠状病毒病对奥密克戎毒株流行期间中国三级医院医院服务利用及优化大流行控制策略制定的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11289-1.
6
What factors affect Beijing residents' contracts with family doctors? A comparative study of Beijing's urban and suburban areas.哪些因素影响了北京居民与家庭医生的签约?北京市城乡对比研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 6;11:1159592. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1159592. eCollection 2023.
7
Impact of slack resources on healthcare costs in tertiary and secondary hospitals: a panel data study of public hospitals in Beijing from 2015 to 2019.松弛资源对三级和二级医院医疗成本的影响:2015 年至 2019 年北京市公立医院的面板数据研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 19;13(4):e068383. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068383.
8
Research on the Cooperative Governance Path of Multiple Stakeholders in Doctor-Patient Disputes under the Environment of Information Asymmetry.信息不对称环境下医患纠纷多元主体协同治理路径研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;20(2):1597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021597.
9
Public trust in the long-term care insurance pilot program in China: An analysis of mediating effects.公众对中国长期护理保险试点项目的信任:中介效应分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;10:928745. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.928745. eCollection 2022.
10
Assessment of the satisfaction with public health insurance programs by patients with chronic diseases in China: a structural equation modeling approach.中国慢性病患者对公共医疗保险计划满意度的评估:结构方程建模方法。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 19;21(1):1886. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11947-7.

本文引用的文献

1
China's encouraging commitment to health.中国对健康的积极承诺。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 21;365:l4178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4178.
2
What can we learn from China's health system reform?我们能从中国的医疗卫生体制改革中学到什么?
BMJ. 2019 Jun 19;365:l2349. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2349.
3
Factors and Preferences in Patient Selection and Location of Care.患者选择及护理地点的因素与偏好。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2018 Oct/Dec;37(4):311-316. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000234.
4
Can you recommend me a good GP? Describing social differences in patient satisfaction within 31 countries.你能给我推荐一位好的全科医生吗?描述31个国家患者满意度的社会差异。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Feb 1;30(1):9-15. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx157.
5
Liberty in Health Care: A Comparative Study Between Hong Kong and Mainland China.医疗保健中的自由:香港与中国大陆的比较研究
J Med Philos. 2017 Nov 15;42(6):690-719. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx026.
6
Emergency Department Staff Beliefs About Self-Harm: A Thematic Framework Analysis.急诊科工作人员对自我伤害的看法:一项主题框架分析
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Aug;54(6):814-822. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0178-8. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
7
Does Level of Hospital Matter? A Study of Mortality of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients in Shanxi, China.医院级别重要吗?中国山西急性心肌梗死患者死亡率的研究。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):185-192. doi: 10.1177/1062860617708608. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
Inequality in the distribution of health resources and health services in China: hospitals versus primary care institutions.中国卫生资源与卫生服务分配中的不平等:医院与基层医疗机构对比
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 3;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0543-9.
9
China's Health Reform Update.中国医改新进展
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:431-448. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044247. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
Associations between hospital characteristics and patient satisfaction in Germany.德国医院特征与患者满意度的关联
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):593-600. doi: 10.1111/hex.12485. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

北京市不同级别医院间患者满意度的对比研究:患者为何偏爱高水平医院?

A comparative study of patients' satisfaction with different levels of hospitals in Beijing: why do patients prefer high-level hospitals?

机构信息

School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, No.10 Xitoutiao, Youanmenwai Street, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China.

Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 10;20(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05507-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05507-9
PMID:32650761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7350561/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To promote the integration of medical resources, Beijing has built medical alliances since 2012, but this reform has not changed the state of disordered medical treatment. Patients are still willing to go to high-level hospitals for medical treatment. What causes patients to prefer high-level hospitals? To explore the reasons behind this preference for high-level medical treatment among patients and to guide patients to make visits in an orderly manner, we conducted this study and compared patients' satisfaction with hospitals of different levels in the context of medical resource integration.

METHODS

This study conducted a questionnaire survey among 1250 patients who were selected in 18 medical alliances in Beijing from October to December 2016. The study type is a comparative study based on cross-sectional data. Patient satisfaction was the main outcome, and descriptive analysis, chi-square tests, nonparametric tests and binary logistic regression analysis were used. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The overall satisfaction score of the medical alliances was 3.375, and the satisfaction scores of core hospitals and cooperative hospitals were 2.77 and 3.07, respectively. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 44.62%, and the satisfaction rates of core hospitals and cooperative hospitals were 34.34 and 50.43%, respectively. The type of hospital and understanding of medical alliance policy were the factors associated with patient satisfaction with the medical alliance.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients' satisfaction with cooperative hospitals was higher than their satisfaction with core hospitals. Although the patients were more satisfied with the service attitude of the cooperative hospitals, they still preferred core hospitals due to their higher expectations for their medical treatment and greater trust in their medical technology. It is necessary to explore the establishment of closed medical alliances under the unified management of human and financial resources to enable medical alliances to become a community of common interests and provide integrated medical services for patients.

摘要

背景

为促进医疗资源整合,北京自 2012 年以来组建了医疗联合体,但这一改革并未改变医疗无序就诊的状况,患者仍然愿意到大医院就诊。患者为何偏好去大医院?为探讨患者偏好大医院就诊的原因,引导患者有序就医,我们在医疗资源整合背景下,比较了不同级别医院患者的满意度。

方法

本研究于 2016 年 10 月至 12 月,采用问卷调查法,在北京市 18 个医联体中选取 1250 例患者进行调查,研究类型为基于横断面数据的对比研究。以患者满意度为主要结局,采用描述性分析、卡方检验、非参数检验、二分类 Logistic 回归分析,检验水准α=0.05。

结果

医联体总体满意度评分为 3.375 分,核心医院和合作医院的满意度评分分别为 2.77 分、3.07 分。总体患者满意度为 44.62%,核心医院和合作医院的满意度分别为 34.34%、50.43%。医院类型和对医联体政策的了解是影响患者对医联体满意度的因素。

结论

合作医院的患者满意度高于核心医院。患者虽然对合作医院的服务态度更满意,但由于对治疗效果的期望更高、对医疗技术的信任更大,仍更偏好核心医院。有必要探索在人财物统一管理下建立紧密型医联体,使医联体成为利益共同体,为患者提供连续性的医疗服务。