Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Palo Alto Foundation Medical Group, Mountain View, CA, USA; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lancet. 2020 Jul 11;396(10244):110-120. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30609-7.
Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease resulting in skin depigmentation and reduced quality of life. There is no approved treatment for vitiligo repigmentation and current off-label therapies have limited efficacy, emphasising the need for improved treatment options. We investigated the therapeutic potential of ruxolitinib cream in patients with vitiligo and report the efficacy and safety results up to 52 weeks of double-blind treatment.
We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study for adult patients with vitiligo in 26 US hospitals and medical centres in 18 states. Patients with depigmentation of 0·5% or more of their facial body surface area (BSA) and 3% or more of their non-facial BSA were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) by use of an interactive response technology system to receive ruxolitinib cream (1·5% twice daily, 1·5% once daily, 0·5% once daily, or 0·15% once daily) or vehicle (control group) twice daily on lesions constituting 20% or less of their total BSA for 24 weeks. Patients in the control group in addition to patients in the 0·15% once daily group who did not show a 25% or higher improvement from baseline in facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) at week 24 were re-randomised to one of three higher ruxolitinib cream doses (0·5% once daily, 1·5% once daily, 1·5% twice daily). Patients in the 0·5% once daily, 1·5% once daily, or 1·5% twice daily groups remained at their original dose up to week 52. Patients, investigators, and the study sponsor (except members of the interim analysis and primary endpoint analysis data monitoring teams) remained masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a 50% or higher improvement from baseline in F-VASI (F-VASI50) at week 24, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03099304.
Between June 7, 2017, and March 21, 2018, 205 patients were screened for eligibility, 48 were excluded and 157 patients (mean age, 48·3 years [SD 12·9]; 73 [46%] male and 84 [54%] female) were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or the control group. 32 (20%) of 157 were assigned to the control group, 31 (20%) to the 0·15% once daily group, 31 (20%) to the 0·5% once daily group, 30 (19%) to the 1·5% once daily group, and 33 (21%) to the 1·5% twice daily group. F-VASI50 at week 24 was reached by significantly more patients given ruxolitinib cream at 1·5% twice daily (15 [45%] of 33) and 1·5% once daily (15 [50%] of 30) than were treated with vehicle (one [3%] of 32). Four patients had serious treatment-emergent adverse events (one patient in the 1·5% twice daily group developed subdural haematoma; one patient in the 1·5% once daily group had a seizure; one patient in the 0·5% once daily group had coronary artery occlusion; and one patient in the 0·5% once daily group had oesophageal achalasia), all of which were unrelated to study treatment. Application site pruritus was the most common treatment-related adverse event among patients given ruxolitinib cream (one [3%] of 33 in the 1·5% twice daily group; three [10%] of 30 in the 1·5% once daily group; three [10%] of 31 in the 0·5% once daily group; and six [19%] of 31 in the 0·15% once daily group)with three [9%] of 32 patients showing application site pruritis in the control group. Acne was noted as a treatment-related adverse event in 13 (10%) of 125 patients who received ruxolitinib cream and one (3%) of 32 patients who received vehicle cream. All treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and similar across treatment groups.
Treatment with ruxolitinib cream was associated with substantial repigmentation of vitiligo lesions up to 52 weeks of treatment, and all doses were well tolerated. These data suggest that ruxolitinib cream might be an effective treatment option for patients with vitiligo.
Incyte.
白癜风是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,导致皮肤脱色和生活质量下降。目前尚无批准的白癜风复色治疗方法,现有的非适应证治疗方法疗效有限,这强调了需要改进治疗选择。我们研究了鲁索替尼乳膏在白癜风患者中的治疗潜力,并报告了双盲治疗 52 周的疗效和安全性结果。
我们在 26 家美国医院和 18 个州的医疗中心进行了一项多中心、随机、双盲、2 期研究,纳入了面部和非面部 BSA 分别有 0.5%或以上和 3%或以上脱色的成年白癜风患者。患者按 1:1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配(使用交互式反应技术系统),接受鲁索替尼乳膏(1.5%,每日 2 次;1.5%,每日 1 次;0.5%,每日 1 次;0.15%,每日 1 次)或赋形剂(对照组),在 24 周内每天两次涂抹皮损面积占总 BSA 的 20%或以下。在第 24 周时,对照组中未达到面部白癜风面积评分指数(F-VASI)较基线升高 25%或更高的患者(0.15%,每日 1 次组),以及面部和非面部 BSA 脱色分别有 0.5%或以上和 1%或以上的患者,被重新随机分配至三种较高剂量的鲁索替尼乳膏(0.5%,每日 1 次;1.5%,每日 1 次;1.5%,每日 2 次)。0.5%,每日 1 次、1.5%,每日 1 次或 1.5%,每日 2 次组的患者在第 52 周前仍保持原剂量。患者、研究者和研究赞助商(除临时分析和主要终点分析数据监测团队成员外)在整个研究过程中均对治疗分配保持盲态。主要终点是在第 24 周时 F-VASI 较基线升高 50%或更高的患者比例(F-VASI50),在意向治疗人群中评估。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT03099304。
2017 年 6 月 7 日至 2018 年 3 月 21 日期间,有 205 名患者接受了入组筛选,其中 48 名被排除在外,157 名患者(平均年龄 48.3 岁[SD 12.9];73 [46%]为男性,84 [54%]为女性)被随机分配至干预组或对照组。157 名患者中,32 名(20%)被分配至对照组,31 名(20%)被分配至 0.15%,每日 1 次组,31 名(20%)被分配至 0.5%,每日 1 次组,30 名(19%)被分配至 1.5%,每日 1 次组,33 名(21%)被分配至 1.5%,每日 2 次组。在第 24 周时,接受鲁索替尼乳膏 1.5%,每日 2 次(33 名患者中的 15 名[45%])和 1.5%,每日 1 次(30 名患者中的 15 名[50%])治疗的患者中,F-VASI50 达到的患者比例明显高于接受赋形剂治疗的患者(32 名患者中的 1 名[3%])。有 4 名患者发生严重的治疗相关不良事件(1.5%,每日 2 次组的 1 名患者发生硬膜下血肿;1.5%,每日 1 次组的 1 名患者发生癫痫发作;0.5%,每日 1 次组的 1 名患者发生冠状动脉闭塞;0.5%,每日 1 次组的 1 名患者发生食管贲门失弛缓症),均与研究治疗无关。接受鲁索替尼乳膏治疗的患者中,最常见的治疗相关不良事件是应用部位瘙痒(1.5%,每日 2 次组的 1 名患者[3%];1.5%,每日 1 次组的 3 名患者[10%];0.5%,每日 1 次组的 3 名患者[10%];0.15%,每日 1 次组的 6 名患者[19%]),对照组中 32 名患者中有 3 名(9%)出现应用部位瘙痒。接受鲁索替尼乳膏治疗的 125 名患者中有 13 名(10%)出现痤疮,接受赋形剂治疗的 32 名患者中有 1 名(3%)出现痤疮。所有治疗相关不良事件的严重程度均为轻度或中度,且在治疗组间相似。
鲁索替尼乳膏治疗可导致白癜风皮损在 52 周的治疗期间出现明显复色,且所有剂量均耐受良好。这些数据表明,鲁索替尼乳膏可能是白癜风患者的一种有效治疗选择。
Incyte。