Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, Cleveland, OH.
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, Cleveland, OH.
Urology. 2020 Oct;144:130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.047. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
To compare the incidence of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures between open cystectomy, robotic cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion, and robotic cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. The effect of surgeon learning curve on stricture incidence following intracorporeal diversion was investigated as a secondary outcome.
Patients who underwent radical cystectomy at an academic hospital between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome, incidence of anastomotic stricture over time, was assessed by a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. A Cox regression model adjusting for sequential case number in a surgeon's experience was used to assess intracorporeal learning curve.
Nine hundred sixty-eight patients were included: 279 open, 382 robotic extracorporeal, and 307 robotic intracorporeal. Benign stricture incidence was 11.3% overall: 26 (9.3%) after open, 43 (11.3%) after robotic extracorporeal, and 40 (13.0%) after robotic intracorporeal. An intracorporeal approach was associated with anastomotic stricture on multivariable analysis (HR 1.66; P = .05). After 75 intracorporeal cases, stricture incidence declined from 17.5% to 4.9%. Higher sequential case volume was independently associated with reduced stricture incidence (Hazard Ratio per 10 cases: 0.90; P = .02).
An intracorporeal approach to urinary reconstruction following robotic radical cystectomy was associated with an increased risk of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture. In surgeons' early experience with intracorporeal diversion the difference in stricture incidence was more pronounced compared to alternative approaches; however, increased intracorporeal case volume was associated with a decline in stricture incidence leading to a modest difference between the 3 surgical approaches overall.
比较开放式膀胱切除术、机器人辅助膀胱切除术伴体外尿路转流和机器人辅助膀胱切除术伴体内尿路转流三种术式的良性输-肠吻合口狭窄发生率。将手术医生学习曲线对体内转流术后吻合口狭窄发生率的影响作为次要结果进行研究。
回顾性分析 2011 年至 2018 年在一家学术医院行根治性膀胱切除术的患者。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归评估吻合口狭窄的时间依赖性发生率这一主要结局。采用 Cox 回归模型,对手术医生经验中连续病例数进行调整,评估体内学习曲线。
共纳入 968 例患者:279 例为开放式,382 例为机器人辅助体外式,307 例为机器人辅助体内式。总体良性狭窄发生率为 11.3%:开放式为 26(9.3%)例,机器人辅助体外式为 43(11.3%)例,机器人辅助体内式为 40(13.0%)例。多变量分析显示,采用体内式方法与吻合口狭窄相关(HR 1.66;P =.05)。在完成 75 例体内式病例后,狭窄发生率从 17.5%降至 4.9%。连续病例数的增加与狭窄发生率的降低独立相关(每增加 10 例的危险比:0.90;P =.02)。
机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后采用体内尿路重建与良性输-肠吻合口狭窄风险增加相关。在手术医生的早期体内转流经验中,与其他方法相比,吻合口狭窄发生率的差异更为明显;然而,体内病例数量的增加与狭窄发生率的降低相关,导致 3 种手术方法之间的总体差异较小。