Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Global Institute of Psychosocial, Palliative and End-of-Life Care (GIPPEC), University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Global Institute of Psychosocial, Palliative and End-of-Life Care (GIPPEC), University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;136:95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
The lack of integration between public health approaches, cancer care and palliative and end-of-life care in the majority of health systems globally became strikingly evident in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. At the same time, the collapse of the boundaries between these domains imposed by the pandemic created unique opportunities for intersectoral planning and collaboration. While the challenge of integration is not unique to oncology, the organisation of cancer care and its linkages to palliative care and to global health may allow it to be a demonstration model for how the problem of integration can be addressed. Before the pandemic, the large majority of individuals with cancer in need of palliative care in low- and middle-income countries and the poor or marginalised in high-income countries were denied access. This inequity was highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, as individuals in impoverished or population-dense settings with weak health systems have been more likely to become infected and to have less access to medical care and to palliative and end-of-life care. Such inequities deserve attention by government, financial institutions and decision makers in health care. However, there has been no framework in most countries for integrated decision-making that takes into account the requirements of public health, clinical medicine and palliative and end-of-life care. Integrated planning across these domains at all levels would allow for more coordinated resource allocation and better preparedness for the inevitability of future systemic threats to population health.
在全球大多数卫生系统中,公共卫生方法、癌症护理以及姑息治疗和临终关怀之间缺乏整合,这在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的背景下变得非常明显。与此同时,大流行打破了这些领域之间的界限,为部门间规划和协作创造了独特的机会。虽然整合的挑战并非肿瘤学所独有,但癌症护理的组织及其与姑息治疗和全球卫生的联系,可以使其成为解决整合问题的示范模式。在大流行之前,在中低收入国家,大多数需要姑息治疗的癌症患者以及高收入国家的贫困或边缘人群都无法获得姑息治疗。COVID-19 大流行凸显了这种不平等,因为在卫生系统薄弱、贫困人口或人口密集地区的人更容易感染,并且获得医疗和姑息治疗及临终关怀的机会更少。这些不平等现象值得政府、金融机构和医疗保健决策者关注。然而,在大多数国家,都没有一个综合决策框架,该框架考虑到公共卫生、临床医学和姑息治疗及临终关怀的要求。在这些领域的各个层面进行综合规划,将允许更协调地分配资源,并为未来对人口健康的系统性威胁做好更好的准备。