Oyanedel Carlos N, Durán Ernesto, Niethard Niels, Inostroza Marion, Born Jan
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Graduate School of Neural & Behavioural Science, International Max Planck Research School, Tübingen, Germany.
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Dec;52(12):4762-4778. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14906. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
The systems consolidation of memory during slow-wave sleep (SWS) is thought to rely on a dialogue between hippocampus and neocortex that is regulated by an interaction between neocortical slow oscillations (SOs), thalamic spindles and hippocampal ripples. Here, we examined the occurrence rates of and the temporal relationships between these oscillatory events in rats, to identify the possible direction of interaction between these events under natural conditions. To facilitate comparisons with findings in humans, we combined frontal and parietal surface EEG with local field potential (LFP) recordings in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and dorsal hippocampus (dHC). Consistent with a top-down driving influence, EEG SO upstates were associated with an increase in spindles and hippocampal ripples. This increase was missing in SO upstates identified in mPFC recordings. Ripples in dHC recordings always followed the onset of spindles consistent with spindles timing ripple occurrence. Comparing ripple activity during co-occurring SO-spindle events with that during isolated SOs or spindles, suggested that ripple dynamics during SO-spindle events are mainly determined by the spindle, with only the SO downstate providing a global inhibitory signal to both thalamus and hippocampus. As to bottom-up influences, we found an increase in hippocampal ripples ~200 ms before the SO downstate, but no similar increase of spindles preceding SO downstates. Overall, the temporal pattern is consistent with a loop-like scenario where, top-down, SOs can trigger thalamic spindles which, in turn, regulate the occurrence of hippocampal ripples. Ripples, bottom-up, and independent from thalamic spindles, can contribute to the emergence of neocortical SOs.
慢波睡眠(SWS)期间记忆的系统巩固被认为依赖于海马体和新皮层之间的对话,这种对话由新皮层慢振荡(SOs)、丘脑纺锤波和海马体涟漪之间的相互作用调节。在这里,我们研究了大鼠中这些振荡事件的发生率及其时间关系,以确定在自然条件下这些事件之间可能的相互作用方向。为便于与人类研究结果进行比较,我们将额叶和顶叶表面脑电图与内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)和背侧海马体(dHC)的局部场电位(LFP)记录相结合。与自上而下的驱动影响一致,脑电图SO上升期与纺锤波和海马体涟漪的增加相关。在mPFC记录中识别出的SO上升期没有这种增加。dHC记录中的涟漪总是跟随纺锤波的开始,这与纺锤波决定涟漪发生的时间一致。将同时出现的SO-纺锤波事件期间的涟漪活动与孤立的SO或纺锤波期间的涟漪活动进行比较,表明SO-纺锤波事件期间的涟漪动态主要由纺锤波决定,只有SO下降期为丘脑和海马体提供全局抑制信号。至于自下而上的影响,我们发现在SO下降期前约200毫秒海马体涟漪增加,但在SO下降期前纺锤波没有类似增加。总体而言,时间模式与一种环状情景一致,即自上而下,SOs可触发丘脑纺锤波,进而调节海马体涟漪的发生。涟漪自下而上且独立于丘脑纺锤波,可促成新皮层SOs的出现。