• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

755nm 翠绿宝石激光单次发射与多次发射治疗各类型肤色毛发的安全性和有效性:一项初步研究。

Safety and efficacy of single pass vs multipass emission with 755 alexandrite laser for all-skin-type hair removal: A pilot study.

机构信息

Laser Cutaneous Cosmetic & Plastic Surgery Unit, Villa Donatello Clinic, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14001. doi: 10.1111/dth.14001. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1111/dth.14001
PMID:32654400
Abstract

Lasers are considered the most efficient methods for hair reduction. The goal of these devices is to provide long-term effects without adverse reactions. This is a randomized split-body controlled study on body hair removal and pseudofolliculitis (PFC) treatment, comparing the standard single pass (SP) emission with the multipass emission (Moveo handpiece) with 755 alexandrite laser. Patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to VI underwent laser hair removal, by treating one side of the body using the standard SP and the other side with Moveo. Treated areas included face, arms, legs, trunk, axillae and groins. Each patient underwent a minimum of three to a maximum of eight treatments, every 6 weeks, with a 6-month follow-up. Hair reduction, side effects, PFC severity score and patient satisfaction were recorded for all patients. Totally, 108 patients were enrolled, of whom 96 were female. The overall hair reduction rate (% ± SD), independent of skin type, was estimated as 87 ± 5.5 for standard SP and 78.5 ± 7.6 for Moveo. No significant statistically differences were found between the two groups. Side effects included pain, which was higher after standard SP (4.2 ± 0.8) than after Moveo treatment (1.5 ± 0.5). A statistical significant difference between the two devices was found (P = .0002). PFC score improved in almost all the patients. Patients declared to be satisfied with both the treatments, reporting a preference for Moveo (84% vs 16%) (P = .01). Standard SP and Moveo 755 alexandrite laser seems to be safe and effective treatments for hair removal in all Fitzpatrick skin types and for PFC. Moveo has a higher security profile with fewer side effects.

摘要

激光被认为是减少毛发最有效的方法。这些设备的目标是提供长期效果而无不良反应。这是一项关于身体脱毛和假性毛囊炎(PFC)治疗的随机分体对照研究,比较了标准单次发射(SP)与多遍发射(Moveo 手柄)755 翠绿宝石激光的效果。Fitzpatrick 皮肤 I-VI 型患者接受激光脱毛,一侧使用标准 SP 治疗,另一侧使用 Moveo 治疗。治疗区域包括面部、手臂、腿部、躯干、腋窝和腹股沟。每位患者至少接受 3 次最多 8 次治疗,每 6 周 1 次,随访 6 个月。记录所有患者的毛发减少、副作用、PFC 严重程度评分和患者满意度。共纳入 108 例患者,其中 96 例为女性。独立于皮肤类型,总体毛发减少率(%±SD)估计为标准 SP 为 87±5.5%,Moveo 为 78.5±7.6%。两组之间无统计学差异。副作用包括疼痛,标准 SP 后疼痛更高(4.2±0.8),Moveo 后疼痛较低(1.5±0.5)。两种设备之间存在统计学差异(P = 0.0002)。几乎所有患者的 PFC 评分都有所改善。患者对两种治疗均表示满意,报告更喜欢 Moveo(84%对 16%)(P = 0.01)。标准 SP 和 Moveo 755 翠绿宝石激光似乎是所有 Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型和 PFC 的安全有效脱毛治疗方法。Moveo 的副作用较少,安全性更高。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of single pass vs multipass emission with 755 alexandrite laser for all-skin-type hair removal: A pilot study.755nm 翠绿宝石激光单次发射与多次发射治疗各类型肤色毛发的安全性和有效性:一项初步研究。
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14001. doi: 10.1111/dth.14001. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
2
Treatment of benign hyperpigmentations and pigmented scars by 755 alexandrite laser comparing the Single Pass versus MultiPass (MoveoPL) emission in skin types I-IV.755 翠绿宝石激光治疗 I-IV 型皮肤的良性色素沉着和色素性瘢痕:单次发射与多次发射(MoveoPL)的比较
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Mar;34(2):e14819. doi: 10.1111/dth.14819. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
Comments on "Safety and efficacy of single pass versus multipass emission with 755 alexandrite laser for all-skin-type hair removal: a pilot study".
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14130. doi: 10.1111/dth.14130. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Removal of unwanted hair: efficacy, tolerability, and safety of long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser equipped with a sapphire handpiece.去除多余毛发:配备蓝宝石手持件的长脉冲755纳米翠绿宝石激光的疗效、耐受性和安全性
Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Sep;33(7):1479-1483. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2503-z. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
5
Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs.新型 755nm 半导体激光与传统 755nm 翠绿宝石激光脱毛的疗效和安全性比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Mar;35(2):373-378. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02829-x. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
6
Removal of Unwanted Hair: Efficacy and Safety of 755-nm Alexandrite Laser Equipped with a 30 mm Spot Handpiece.去除多余毛发:配备 30mm 光斑手具的 755nm 翠绿宝石激光的疗效和安全性。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023 Sep;41(9):509-511. doi: 10.1089/photob.2023.0067. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
7
Laser hair removal: long-term results with a 755 nm alexandrite laser.755纳米翠绿宝石激光用于脱毛的长期效果
Dermatol Surg. 2001 Nov;27(11):920-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.01074.x.
8
Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser.与扫描翠绿宝石激光相比,线性扫描808纳米二极管激光用于脱毛的长期疗效。
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):13-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22185. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser.800纳米二极管激光的大型光斑真空辅助机头与小型光斑传统机头的长期比较
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Sep 1;16(9):893-898.
10
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Laser Hair Removal With the Long-Pulsed 755 nm Wavelength Laser: A Two-Center Study With 948 Patients.评估长脉冲 755nm 激光脱毛的安全性和疗效:一项 948 例患者的两中心研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Jan;52(1):77-83. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23160. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Traditional and in Motion Nd:YAG Laser in Hair Removal: A Prospective Study.比较传统和运动中的 Nd:YAG 激光在脱毛中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 2;58(9):1205. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091205.