Department of Biomechanics and Sport injuries, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Republic of Iran.
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Dec;34(12):1485-1496. doi: 10.1177/0269215520941910. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of scapular exercises alone and combined with cognitive functional therapy in treating patients with chronic neck pain and scapular downward rotation impairment.
Single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Outpatient.
A total of 72 patients (20-45 years old) with chronic neck pain were studied.
Allocation was undertaken into three groups: scapular exercise ( = 24), scapular exercise with cognitive functional therapy ( = 24) and control ( = 24) groups. Each programme lasted three times a week for six weeks.
The primary outcome measure was pain intensity measured by the visual analogue scale scores. The secondary outcome measures included kinesiophobia and muscles activity.
Statistically significant differences in pain intensity were found when multidisciplinary physiotherapy group including a cognitive functional approach was compared with the scapular exercise alone group at six weeks (effect size (95% CI) = -2.56 (-3.32 to -1.80); = 0.019). Regarding kinesiophobia, a significant between-group difference was observed at six-week (effect size (95% CI) = -2.20 (-2.92 to -1.49); = 0.005), with the superiority of effect in multidisciplinary physiotherapy group. A significant between-group differences was observed in muscle activity. Also, there were significant between-group differences favouring experimental groups versus control.
A group-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme including scapular exercise plus cognitive functional therapy was superior to group-based scapular exercise alone for improving pain intensity, kinesiophobia and muscle activation in participants with chronic neck pain.
本研究旨在比较单纯肩胛运动和联合认知功能疗法治疗慢性颈痛伴肩胛下旋功能障碍患者的疗效。
单盲随机对照试验。
门诊。
共 72 例(20-45 岁)慢性颈痛患者。
将患者分为三组:肩胛运动组(n=24)、肩胛运动联合认知功能疗法组(n=24)和对照组(n=24)。每个方案每周进行 3 次,持续 6 周。
主要结局测量为视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估的疼痛强度。次要结局指标包括运动恐惧和肌肉活动。
与单纯肩胛运动组相比,多学科物理治疗组(包括认知功能方法)在 6 周时疼痛强度的差异具有统计学意义(效应量(95%置信区间)=-2.56(-3.32 至-1.80);P=0.019)。关于运动恐惧,在 6 周时观察到组间差异有统计学意义(效应量(95%置信区间)=-2.20(-2.92 至-1.49);P=0.005),多学科物理治疗组效果更好。肌肉活动也观察到组间差异有统计学意义。此外,实验组与对照组之间存在显著的组间差异。
与单纯肩胛运动组相比,以小组为基础的多学科康复方案包括肩胛运动加认知功能疗法在改善慢性颈痛患者的疼痛强度、运动恐惧和肌肉激活方面更具优势。