• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hospice interdisciplinary team providers' attitudes toward sexual and gender minority patients and caregivers.临终关怀多学科团队提供者对性少数群体和性别少数群体患者及照护者的态度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2185-2191. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Providing home hospice care for LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers: Perceptions and opinions of hospice interdisciplinary care team providers.为 LGBTQ+ 患者及其照护者提供居家临终关怀服务:临终关怀跨学科护理团队提供者的认知与看法。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Feb;21(1):3-11. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522000657.
3
"We Treat Everyone Equally": Hospice Care Team Members' Language Use Regarding Sexual and Gender Minority Patients and Caregivers.“我们平等对待每一个人”:临终关怀护理团队成员对性少数群体和跨性别群体患者及照护者的语言使用情况。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jun;40(6):601-606. doi: 10.1177/10499091221116634. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Improving Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Care: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives From a Multi-Methods Pilot Study.改善性少数群体和性别少数群体的癌症护理:一项多方法试点研究中患者和护理人员的观点
Front Oncol. 2022 May 6;12:833195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833195. eCollection 2022.
5
Improving the Hospice and Palliative Care Experiences of LGBTQ Patients and Their Caregivers.改善 LGBTQ 患者及其照护者的临终关怀和姑息治疗体验。
Prim Care. 2021 Jun;48(2):339-349. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
The Burden of having to Wonder: Hospice Caregiving Experiences of LGBTQ+ Cancer Family Caregivers.疑惑的负担:LGBTQ+癌症家庭照顾者的临终关怀照顾经历
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Jan;41(1):56-62. doi: 10.1177/10499091231159089. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
7
A survey of oncology advanced practice providers' knowledge and attitudes towards sexual and gender minorities with cancer.一项关于肿瘤学高级实践提供者对癌症患者的性少数群体和性别少数群体的知识和态度的调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):2953-2966. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15302. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
Current Best Practices for Sexual and Gender Minorities in Hospice and Palliative Care Settings.姑息治疗和临终关怀环境中针对性行为和性别少数群体的现行最佳实践。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 May;55(5):1420-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.12.479. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
9
Together-Equitable-Accessible-Meaningful (TEAM) Training to Improve Cancer Care for Sexual and Gender Minorities (SGM): Outcomes from a Pilot Study.联合公平可及有意义(TEAM)培训改善对性少数群体和跨性别群体(SGM)的癌症护理:一项试点研究的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02134-2. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
10
A National Study of Medical Students' Attitudes Toward Sexual and Gender Minority Populations: Evaluating the Effects of Demographics and Training.一项针对医学生对性少数群体和性别少数群体态度的全国性研究:评估人口统计学和培训的影响。
LGBT Health. 2021 Jan;8(1):79-87. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0288. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dissectionality of Care in the U.S.: A Scoping Review in Healthcare of Implicit Bias, Perceived Discrimination, and Minority Stress Among Sexual and Gender Minorities.美国医疗保健中的分层护理:对性少数群体和性别少数群体的隐性偏见、感知到的歧视及少数群体压力的医疗保健领域范围综述
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03155-w.
2
Religious-based negative attitudes towards LGBTQ people among healthcare, social care and social work students and professionals: A review of the international literature.宗教对医疗保健、社会关怀和社会工作学生及专业人员中 LGBTQ 人群的负面态度:国际文献综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e1449-e1470. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13812. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
3
Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Survivors: a Review of Current Research and Recommendations.姑息治疗和生命终末期关怀在性少数和跨性别癌症幸存者中的应用:当前研究与建议的综述。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2021 Mar 14;23(4):39. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01034-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural Humility: A Way to Reduce LGBTQ Health Disparities at the End of Life.文化谦逊:减少 LGBTQ 人群在生命终末期健康差异的一种方法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;37(6):404-408. doi: 10.1177/1049909119880548. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
2
Training to reduce LGBTQ-related bias among medical, nursing, and dental students and providers: a systematic review.培训以减少医学、护理和牙科学生和提供者中与 LGBTQ 相关的偏见:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1727-3.
3
Primary Care Providers' Attitudes, Practices, and Knowledge in Treating LGBTQ Communities.初级保健提供者在治疗 LGBTQ 社区方面的态度、实践和知识。
J Homosex. 2019;66(13):1927-1947. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1519304. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Knowledge, Beliefs, and Communication Behavior of Oncology Health-care Providers (HCPs) regarding Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Patient Health care.肿瘤学医护人员(HCPs)对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)患者健康护理的知识、信念和沟通行为。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(4):329-339. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1443527. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
5
Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers.为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)癌症患者及其护理人员提供的姑息治疗和临终关怀。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018 Feb;34(1):60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
6
Cancer and the LGBTQ Population: Quantitative and Qualitative Results from an Oncology Providers' Survey on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Behaviors.癌症与 LGBTQ 群体:肿瘤学提供者关于知识、态度和实践行为的调查的定量和定性结果
J Clin Med. 2017 Oct 7;6(10):93. doi: 10.3390/jcm6100093.
7
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.医疗保健专业人员中的隐性偏见:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8.
8
The Science of Conducting Research With LGBT Older Adults- An Introduction to Aging with Pride: National Health, Aging, and Sexuality/Gender Study (NHAS).与 LGBT 老年成年人开展研究的科学——《自豪地变老:国家健康、衰老与性取向/性别研究(NHAS)》简介
Gerontologist. 2017 Feb;57(suppl 1):S1-S14. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw212.
9
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
10
Oncology healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviors regarding LGBT health.肿瘤医疗服务提供者关于 LGBT 健康的知识、态度及实践行为。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct;99(10):1676-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 2.

临终关怀多学科团队提供者对性少数群体和性别少数群体患者及照护者的态度。

Hospice interdisciplinary team providers' attitudes toward sexual and gender minority patients and caregivers.

机构信息

University of Utah College of Nursing, United States.

University of Utah College of Nursing, United States.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2185-2191. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.004
PMID:32660741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8690972/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hospice interdisciplinary team (IDT) providers' attitudes toward sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients and family caregivers impacts quality of care and end-of-life outcomes. This study assessed hospice IDT provider attitudes toward SGM patients and caregivers and identified demographic predictors.

METHODS

Hospice IDT providers (N = 122) completed an adapted 11-item scale measuring attitudes toward SGM hospice patients and caregivers. Descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, and regression models were conducted.

RESULTS

The hospice-adapted Attitudes Toward LGBT Patients Scale (ATLPS) demonstrated acceptable Cronbach's alpha (0.707). Total scores ranged from 32 to 55 (M = 47.04, SD = 5.64) showing that attitudes were generally positive. Being religious (B=-3.169, p = 0.008) was associated with more negative attitudes, while higher education (B = 1.951, p = 0.002) and time employed in hospice agency (B = 0.600, p = 0.028) were associated with more positive attitudes.

CONCLUSION

This is among the first studies to assess SGM-specific hospice IDT attitudes. Participants had relatively positive attitudes, influenced by religious beliefs, clinical experience, and education. CFA results suggest the need for better instruments to measure this complex construct.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Education incorporating evidence of disparities, life-course perspectives, and end-of-life experiences of diverse cohorts of SGM patients and families may build on hospice IDT members' experience and training by influencing attitudes, reducing bias and improving competency.

摘要

目的

临终关怀跨学科团队(IDT)提供者对性少数群体(SGM)患者和家属的态度会影响护理质量和临终结局。本研究评估了临终关怀 IDT 提供者对 SGM 患者和家属的态度,并确定了人口统计学预测因素。

方法

122 名临终关怀 IDT 提供者完成了一项经过改编的包含 11 个项目的量表,用于衡量对 SGM 临终关怀患者和家属的态度。进行了描述性统计分析、验证性因素分析和回归模型。

结果

经过临终关怀改编的 LGBT 患者态度量表(ATLPS)表现出可接受的 Cronbach's alpha(0.707)。总分范围为 32 至 55(M = 47.04,SD = 5.64),表明态度普遍较为积极。宗教信仰(B=-3.169,p = 0.008)与更消极的态度相关,而更高的教育程度(B = 1.951,p = 0.002)和在临终关怀机构工作的时间(B = 0.600,p = 0.028)与更积极的态度相关。

结论

这是首批评估 SGM 特定临终关怀 IDT 态度的研究之一。参与者的态度相对较为积极,受到宗教信仰、临床经验和教育的影响。验证性因素分析结果表明,需要更好的工具来衡量这一复杂的概念。

实践意义

将证据表明的差异、生命历程视角以及不同 SGM 患者和家庭的临终经历纳入教育中,可能会通过影响态度、减少偏见和提高能力,来补充临终关怀 IDT 成员的经验和培训。