Suppr超能文献

糖尿病性口干症中的人工唾液(ASDIX):Aldiamed与安慰剂的双盲试验

Artificial Saliva in Diabetic Xerostomia (ASDIX): Double Blind Trial of Aldiamed Versus Placebo.

作者信息

Sinjari Bruna, Feragalli Beatrice, Cornelli Umberto, Belcaro Giovanni, Vitacolonna Ester, Santilli Manlio, Rexhepi Imena, D'Addazio Gianmaria, Zuccari Francesca, Caputi Sergio

机构信息

Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 11;9(7):2196. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072196.

Abstract

Xerostomia is a symptom frequently present in patients with type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the present trial, the activity of an artificial saliva (aldiamed spray) in comparison to a placebo spray were used to evaluate the xerostomia and the saliva antioxidant capacity (SAT). Sixty patients of both genders with T1DM or T2DM were randomized into two groups of 30 subjects each. The experiment was a double-blind study approved by the Ethics Committee of the "G. d'Annunzio University" of Chieti and Pescara. Moreover, measurements of the stimulated saliva flow rate and the ultrasonography of the submandibular and parotid glands were performed at both the study time points. The results demonstrated statistically significant differences between the treatments in terms of the xerostomia average score. Specifically, the values were at baseline and after 30 days 2.9 ± 1.31 and 3.0 ± 1.44 and 1.4 ± 1.48 and 2.4 ± 0.99 for aldiamed spray and the placebo, respectively. Meanwhile, no statistically significant differences were shown between the two groups for the other variables, such as the salivary flow rate, the antioxidant capacity of the saliva, and the ultrasonography of the major salivary glands.

摘要

口干症是1型糖尿病(T1DM)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中常见的症状。在本试验中,使用人工唾液(aldiamed喷雾)与安慰剂喷雾进行对比,以评估口干症和唾液抗氧化能力(SAT)。60名患有T1DM或T2DM的男女患者被随机分为两组,每组30名受试者。该实验是一项双盲研究,已获得基耶蒂和佩斯卡拉“G. d'Annunzio大学”伦理委员会的批准。此外,在两个研究时间点均进行了刺激唾液流速测量以及下颌下腺和腮腺的超声检查。结果表明,在口干症平均得分方面,两种治疗方法之间存在统计学上的显著差异。具体而言,aldiamed喷雾和安慰剂在基线时以及30天后的值分别为2.9±1.31和3.0±1.44以及1.4±1.48和2.4±0.99。同时,两组在其他变量方面未显示出统计学上的显著差异,如唾液流速、唾液抗氧化能力以及主要唾液腺的超声检查结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f18/7408818/8dc4f447b444/jcm-09-02196-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验