• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择降低蛋白质生产的能量成本驱动基因转移因子中的 GC 含量和氨基酸组成偏向。

Selection for Reducing Energy Cost of Protein Production Drives the GC Content and Amino Acid Composition Bias in Gene Transfer Agents.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

National Center of Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

mBio. 2020 Jul 14;11(4):e01206-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01206-20.

DOI:10.1128/mBio.01206-20
PMID:32665274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7360931/
Abstract

Gene transfer agents (GTAs) are virus-like elements integrated into bacterial genomes, particularly, those of The GTAs can be induced under conditions of nutritional stress, incorporate random fragments of bacterial DNA into miniphage particles, lyse the host cells, and infect neighboring bacteria, thus enhancing horizontal gene transfer. We show that GTA genes evolve under conditions of pronounced positive selection for the reduction of the energy cost of protein production as shown by comparison of the amino acid compositions with those of both homologous viral genes and host genes. The energy saving in GTA genes is comparable to or even more pronounced than that in the genes encoding the most abundant, essential bacterial proteins. In cases in which viruses acquire genes from GTAs, the bias in amino acid composition disappears in the course of evolution, showing that reduction of the energy cost of protein production is an important factor of evolution of GTAs but not bacterial viruses. These findings strongly suggest that GTAs represent bacterial adaptations rather than selfish, virus-like elements. Because GTA production kills the host cell and does not propagate the GTA genome, it appears likely that the GTAs are retained in the course of evolution via kin or group selection. Therefore, we hypothesize that GTAs facilitate the survival of bacterial populations under energy-limiting conditions through the spread of metabolic and transport capabilities via horizontal gene transfer and increases in nutrient availability resulting from the altruistic suicide of GTA-producing cells. Kin selection and group selection remain controversial topics in evolutionary biology. We argue that these types of selection are likely to operate in bacterial populations by showing that bacterial gene transfer agents (GTAs), but not related viruses, evolve under conditions of positive selection for the reduction of the energy cost of GTA particle production. We hypothesize that GTAs are dedicated devices mediating the survival of bacteria under conditions of nutrient limitation. The benefits conferred by GTAs under nutritional stress conditions appear to include horizontal dissemination of genes that could provide bacteria with enhanced capabilities for nutrient utilization and increases of nutrient availability occurring through the lysis of GTA-producing bacteria.

摘要

基因转移因子 (GTA) 是整合到细菌基因组中的病毒样元件,特别是那些在营养压力条件下可以被诱导的细菌基因组。GTA 可以将细菌 DNA 的随机片段整合到小型噬菌体颗粒中,裂解宿主细胞并感染邻近的细菌,从而增强水平基因转移。我们表明,GTA 基因在蛋白质生产能量成本降低的显著正选择条件下进化,这可以通过比较氨基酸组成与同源病毒基因和宿主基因的氨基酸组成来证明。GTA 基因的节能作用可与编码最丰富、必需的细菌蛋白的基因相当,甚至更为明显。在病毒从 GTAs 获得基因的情况下,在进化过程中氨基酸组成的偏向消失,表明蛋白质生产能量成本的降低是 GTA 进化的一个重要因素,但不是细菌病毒的进化因素。这些发现强烈表明,GTA 代表细菌的适应,而不是自私的、类似病毒的元件。由于 GTA 的产生会杀死宿主细胞,并且不会传播 GTA 基因组,因此 GTA 似乎很可能通过亲缘选择或群体选择在进化过程中保留下来。因此,我们假设 GTA 通过水平基因转移传播代谢和运输能力,并通过 GTA 产生细胞的利他自杀增加营养物质的可用性,从而促进细菌种群在能量限制条件下的生存。亲缘选择和群体选择仍然是进化生物学中的争议话题。我们通过表明细菌基因转移因子 (GTA),而不是相关病毒,在降低 GTA 颗粒生产能量成本的正选择条件下进化,证明了这些类型的选择可能在细菌种群中起作用。我们假设 GTA 是专门用于介导细菌在营养限制条件下生存的设备。在营养压力条件下,GTA 提供的好处似乎包括可以为细菌提供增强的营养利用能力的基因的水平传播,以及通过 GTA 产生细菌的裂解而增加的营养物质可用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/f8526a4e3c0f/mBio.01206-20-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/97a5438689e9/mBio.01206-20-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/ef8c90a3dfdb/mBio.01206-20-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/8f74de26dc4e/mBio.01206-20-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/f8526a4e3c0f/mBio.01206-20-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/97a5438689e9/mBio.01206-20-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/ef8c90a3dfdb/mBio.01206-20-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/8f74de26dc4e/mBio.01206-20-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1e/7360931/f8526a4e3c0f/mBio.01206-20-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Selection for Reducing Energy Cost of Protein Production Drives the GC Content and Amino Acid Composition Bias in Gene Transfer Agents.选择降低蛋白质生产的能量成本驱动基因转移因子中的 GC 含量和氨基酸组成偏向。
mBio. 2020 Jul 14;11(4):e01206-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01206-20.
2
Co-evolution of gene transfer agents and their alphaproteobacterial hosts.基因转移因子与其α变形菌宿主的共同进化。
J Bacteriol. 2024 Feb 22;206(2):e0039823. doi: 10.1128/jb.00398-23. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Selection for Translational Efficiency in Genes Associated with Alphaproteobacterial Gene Transfer Agents.与α变形菌基因转移代理相关基因的翻译效率选择。
mSystems. 2022 Dec 20;7(6):e0089222. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00892-22. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Machine-Learning Classification Suggests That Many Alphaproteobacterial Prophages May Instead Be Gene Transfer Agents.机器学习分类表明,许多α变形菌噬菌体可能实际上是基因转移因子。
Genome Biol Evol. 2019 Oct 1;11(10):2941-2953. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz206.
5
Identification of genes associated with prophage-like gene transfer agents in the pathogenic intestinal spirochaetes Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, Brachyspira pilosicoli and Brachyspira intermedia.在致病性肠道螺旋体猪痢疾短螺旋体、结肠短螺旋体和中间短螺旋体中与前噬菌体样基因转移因子相关的基因鉴定。
Vet Microbiol. 2009 Mar 2;134(3-4):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.051. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
6
Identification of the First Gene Transfer Agent (GTA) Small Terminase in and Its Role in GTA Production and Packaging of DNA.鉴定 和 中的第一个基因转移代理 (GTA) 小终止酶及其在 GTA 生产和 DNA 包装中的作用。
J Virol. 2019 Nov 13;93(23). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01328-19. Print 2019 Dec 1.
7
Gene transfer agents: The ambiguous role of selfless viruses in genetic exchange and bacterial evolution.基因转移因子:无私病毒在基因交换和细菌进化中的模糊角色。
Mol Microbiol. 2025 Feb;123(2):124-131. doi: 10.1111/mmi.15251. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
8
Functional and Evolutionary Characterization of a Gene Transfer Agent's Multilocus "Genome".基因转移因子多位点“基因组”的功能与进化特征分析
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Oct;33(10):2530-43. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw125. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Prophage-like gene transfer agents promote Caulobacter crescentus survival and DNA repair during stationary phase.原噬菌体样基因转移因子促进新月柄杆菌在停滞期的存活和 DNA 修复。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Nov 3;20(11):e3001790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001790. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Environmental factors influencing gene transfer agent (GTA) mediated transduction in the subtropical ocean.影响亚热带海洋中基因转移因子(GTA)介导转导的环境因素。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043506. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The key role of cheaters in the persistence of cooperation.作弊者在合作持续性中的关键作用。
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 23:rs.3.rs-6280939. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6280939/v1.
2
The key role of cheaters in the persistence of cooperation.作弊者在合作持续存在中的关键作用。
bioRxiv. 2024 Nov 3:2024.10.30.621164. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.30.621164.
3
Prospective identification of extracellular triacylglycerol hydrolase with conserved amino acids in 's high G+C genomic dataset.在嗜热栖热放线菌的高G+C基因组数据集中对具有保守氨基酸的细胞外三酰甘油水解酶进行前瞻性鉴定。

本文引用的文献

1
Machine-Learning Classification Suggests That Many Alphaproteobacterial Prophages May Instead Be Gene Transfer Agents.机器学习分类表明,许多α变形菌噬菌体可能实际上是基因转移因子。
Genome Biol Evol. 2019 Oct 1;11(10):2941-2953. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz206.
2
Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments.交互式生命树 (iTOL) v4:最新更新和新发展。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W256-W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239.
3
Identification and characterization of a direct activator of a gene transfer agent.
Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2024 Dec 7;45:e00869. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2024.e00869. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis of Mancinella alouina.曼氏盔鱼线粒体基因组全序列及其系统发育分析。
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Aug 28;51(1):942. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09778-x.
5
Gene transfer agents: The ambiguous role of selfless viruses in genetic exchange and bacterial evolution.基因转移因子:无私病毒在基因交换和细菌进化中的模糊角色。
Mol Microbiol. 2025 Feb;123(2):124-131. doi: 10.1111/mmi.15251. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Co-evolution of gene transfer agents and their alphaproteobacterial hosts.基因转移因子与其α变形菌宿主的共同进化。
J Bacteriol. 2024 Feb 22;206(2):e0039823. doi: 10.1128/jb.00398-23. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Formal recognition and classification of gene transfer agents as viriforms.基因转移因子作为病毒样颗粒的正式认可和分类。
Virus Evol. 2022 Oct 15;8(2):veac100. doi: 10.1093/ve/veac100. eCollection 2022.
8
Selection for Translational Efficiency in Genes Associated with Alphaproteobacterial Gene Transfer Agents.与α变形菌基因转移代理相关基因的翻译效率选择。
mSystems. 2022 Dec 20;7(6):e0089222. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00892-22. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
9
Shared properties of gene transfer agent and core genes revealed by comparative genomics of Alphaproteobacteria.比较α变形菌的基因组揭示了基因转移因子和核心基因的共有特性。
Microb Genom. 2022 Nov;8(11). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000890.
10
Loss of the Rhodobacter capsulatus Serine Acetyl Transferase Gene, , Impairs Gene Transfer by Gene Transfer Agents and Biofilm Phenotypes.缺失红杆菌丝氨酸乙酰基转移酶基因, , 可损害基因转移剂和生物膜表型的基因转移。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022 Oct 11;88(19):e0094422. doi: 10.1128/aem.00944-22. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
鉴定和表征一种基因转移剂的直接激活剂。
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 5;10(1):595. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08526-1.
4
High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries.高通量 ANI 分析 9 万余组原核基因组揭示了清晰的物种界限。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 30;9(1):5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9.
5
Mutant phenotypes for thousands of bacterial genes of unknown function.数千个功能未知的细菌基因的突变表型。
Nature. 2018 May;557(7706):503-509. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0124-0. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
For the greater good: Programmed cell death in bacterial communities.为了更大的利益:细菌群落中的程序性细胞死亡。
Microbiol Res. 2018 Mar;207:161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
Carbon limitation drives GC content evolution of a marine bacterium in an individual-based genome-scale model.基于个体的基因组规模模型中碳限制驱动海洋细菌 GC 含量的演变。
ISME J. 2018 May;12(5):1180-1187. doi: 10.1038/s41396-017-0023-7. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
Insights into origin and evolution of α-proteobacterial gene transfer agents.对α-变形菌基因转移因子起源与进化的见解。
Virus Evol. 2017 Dec 7;3(2):vex036. doi: 10.1093/ve/vex036. eCollection 2017 Jul.
9
UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation.UFBoot2:改进超快bootstrap 逼近算法。
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Feb 1;35(2):518-522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281.
10
Microbial genome analysis: the COG approach.微生物基因组分析:COG 方法。
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Jul 19;20(4):1063-1070. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx117.