Suppr超能文献

经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的比较:细菌学及肿瘤学相关问题

Comparison of NOSES and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: Bacteriological and Oncological Concerns.

作者信息

Ouyang Qianhui, Peng Jian, Xu Shuai, Chen Jie, Wang Wen

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2020 Jun 25;10:946. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00946. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Colorectal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is considered to be a scarless operation that avoids the laparotomy of extraction specimen, but bacteriological and oncological concerns are raised with this technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the oncological and bacteriological outcomes of NOSES and conventional laparoscopic (CL) procedures. This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected outcomes data. Patients operated with colorectal cancer from January 2016 to December 2019 in Xiangya Hospital were assigned to the group NOSES and the group CL according to the size of the tumor. Prior to dissection, peritoneal lavage fluid was collected for cytological assessment. At the end of the procedure, peritoneal lavage fluid was collected for aerobic culture and cytological assessment. Baseline characteristics and short-term and long-term outcomes for NOSES and CL were compared. Between January 2016 and December 2019, 212 patients were enrolled from our center and 185 patients were analyzed (96 and 89 in NOSES and CL groups, respectively). The bacterial positive rate of peritoneal lavage fluid was 34.4 vs. 32.6% in NOSES and CL groups, respectively ( = 0.80). The positive rate of tumor cells in peritoneal lavage fluid was 7.3 vs. 9.0% in NOSES and CL groups, respectively ( = 0.67). Univariate analysis showed that the positive rate of tumor cells in peritoneal lavage fluid was significantly associated with tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis ( < 0.05). T4 (OR = 20.47, 95%CI = 1.241-337.661; = 0.04), N1 (OR = 5.445, 95%CI = 1.412-20.991; = 0.01), and N2 (OR = 6.315, 95%CI = 1.458-27.348; = 0.01) served as independent predictors of peritoneal lavage fluid positive oncology patients. Local recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between two groups (HR = 0.909, 95%CI = 0.291-2.840; = 0.87). Compared with conventional laparoscopic procedure, NOSES is in conformity with the principle of asepsis and tumor-free technique and can be worthy of clinical application and promotion.

摘要

结直肠自然腔道标本取出手术(NOSES)被认为是一种无瘢痕手术,可避免剖腹取标本,但该技术引发了细菌学和肿瘤学方面的担忧。本研究的目的是比较NOSES与传统腹腔镜(CL)手术的肿瘤学和细菌学结果。这是一项对前瞻性收集的结果数据进行的回顾性研究。2016年1月至2019年12月在湘雅医院接受结直肠癌手术的患者根据肿瘤大小被分为NOSES组和CL组。在解剖前,收集腹腔灌洗液进行细胞学评估。在手术结束时,收集腹腔灌洗液进行需氧培养和细胞学评估。比较了NOSES组和CL组的基线特征以及短期和长期结果。2016年1月至2019年12月,本中心共纳入212例患者,分析了185例患者(NOSES组和CL组分别为96例和89例)。NOSES组和CL组腹腔灌洗液细菌阳性率分别为34.4%和32.6%(P = 0.80)。NOSES组和CL组腹腔灌洗液肿瘤细胞阳性率分别为7.3%和9.0%(P = 0.67)。单因素分析显示,腹腔灌洗液肿瘤细胞阳性率与肿瘤浸润深度和淋巴结转移显著相关(P < 0.05)。T4(OR = 20.47,95%CI = 1.241 - 337.661;P = 0.04)、N1(OR = 5.445,95%CI = 1.412 - 20.991;P = 0.01)和N2(OR = 6.315,95%CI = 1.458 - 27.348;P = 0.01)是腹腔灌洗液肿瘤学阳性患者的独立预测因素。两组的局部无复发生存率无显著差异(HR = 0.909,95%CI = 0.291 - 2.840;P = 0.87)。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,NOSES符合无菌和无瘤技术原则,值得临床应用和推广。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d704/7330106/3bab181d7809/fonc-10-00946-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验