• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在剖析数据之前登记研究分析计划(SAPs)——更新和标准化结果建模。

Registering Study Analysis Plans (SAPs) Before Dissecting Your Data-Updating and Standardizing Outcome Modeling.

作者信息

Thor Maria, Oh Jung Hun, Apte Aditya P, Deasy Joseph O

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2020 Jun 24;10:978. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00978. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.00978
PMID:32670879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7327097/
Abstract

Public preregistration of study analysis plans (SAPs) is widely recognized for clinical trials, but adopted to a much lesser extent in observational studies. Registration of SAPs prior to analysis is encouraged to not only increase transparency and exactness but also to avoid positive finding bias and better standardize outcome modeling. Efforts to generally standardize outcome modeling, which can be based on clinical trial and/or observational data, have recently spurred. We suggest a three-step SAP concept in which investigators are encouraged to (1) Design the SAP and circulate it among the co-investigators, (2) Log the SAP with a public repository, which recognizes the SAP with a digital object identifier (DOI), and (3) Cite (using the DOI), briefly summarize and motivate any deviations from the SAP in the associated manuscript. More specifically, the SAP should include the (brief data and study description, co-investigators, hypotheses, primary outcome measure, study title), in addition to step-by-step details of the (handling of missing data, resampling, defined significance level, statistical function, validation, and variables and parameterization).

摘要

研究分析计划(SAPs)的公开预注册在临床试验中已得到广泛认可,但在观察性研究中的采用程度要低得多。鼓励在分析之前对SAPs进行注册,这不仅可以提高透明度和准确性,还能避免阳性结果偏倚,并更好地规范结果建模。最近,人们致力于对可基于临床试验和/或观察性数据的结果建模进行总体规范。我们提出了一个三步SAP概念,鼓励研究者:(1)设计SAP并在共同研究者之间传阅;(2)将SAP记录在公共知识库中,该知识库用数字对象标识符(DOI)识别该SAP;(3)在相关手稿中引用(使用DOI),简要总结并说明与SAP的任何偏差及其原因。更具体地说,除了(缺失数据处理、重采样、定义的显著性水平、统计函数、验证以及变量和参数化)的逐步细节外,SAP还应包括(简要的数据和研究描述、共同研究者、假设、主要结局指标、研究标题)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b19/7327097/388f883704cc/fonc-10-00978-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b19/7327097/5c6eb683602e/fonc-10-00978-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b19/7327097/388f883704cc/fonc-10-00978-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b19/7327097/5c6eb683602e/fonc-10-00978-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b19/7327097/388f883704cc/fonc-10-00978-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Registering Study Analysis Plans (SAPs) Before Dissecting Your Data-Updating and Standardizing Outcome Modeling.在剖析数据之前登记研究分析计划(SAPs)——更新和标准化结果建模。
Front Oncol. 2020 Jun 24;10:978. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00978. eCollection 2020.
2
DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies.观察性研究的 DEBATE 统计分析计划。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0879-5.
3
Access to unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans of randomised trials.获取随机试验未发表的方案和统计分析计划。
Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06641-x.
4
A template for the authoring of statistical analysis plans.统计分析计划撰写模板。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jun 9;34:101100. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101100. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Hospital inpatient self-administration of medicine programmes: a critical literature review.医院住院患者药物自我管理方案:一项批判性文献综述
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Jun;28(3):140-51. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9014-x. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
6
Statistical analysis plan for the Crystalloid Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST).晶体液与羟乙基淀粉试验(CHEST)的统计分析计划。
Crit Care Resusc. 2012 Mar;14(1):44-52.
7
Branched peptides integrate into self-assembled nanostructures and enhance biomechanics of peptidic hydrogels.支化肽整合到自组装纳米结构中,并增强肽水凝胶的生物力学性能。
Acta Biomater. 2018 Jan 15;66:258-271. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.026. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Parameter Study of Superabsorbent Polymers (SAPs) for Use in Durable Concrete Structures.用于耐久性混凝土结构的高吸水性聚合物(SAPs)的参数研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 May 10;12(9):1541. doi: 10.3390/ma12091541.
9
Statistical analysis plan for the Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial.脓毒性休克重症患者辅助性皮质类固醇治疗(ADRENAL)试验的统计分析计划
Crit Care Resusc. 2017 Jun;19(2):183-191.
10
Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration.通过预注册减少偏差、提高透明度并校准可信度。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jan;7(1):15-26. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01497-2. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimising the use of electronic medical records for large scale research in psychiatry.优化电子病历在精神病学大规模研究中的使用。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;14(1):232. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02911-1.
2
Predictive Model of Liver Toxicity to Aid the Personalized Selection of Proton Versus Photon Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.预测肝毒性模型以辅助肝癌质子与光子治疗的个体化选择。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Aug 1;116(5):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.055. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
3
Predictive Modeling of Survival and Toxicity in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Radiotherapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling the Impact of Cardiopulmonary Irradiation on Overall Survival in NRG Oncology Trial RTOG 0617.在NRG肿瘤学试验RTOG 0617中模拟心肺照射对总生存期的影响
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;26(17):4643-4650. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2627. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping.影像生物标志物标准化倡议:高通量基于影像表型的标准化定量放射组学。
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):328-338. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (RT) Compared With Standard RT: A Report From the NRG Oncology RTOG 1203 Study.
预测肝细胞癌放疗后患者的生存和毒性的模型。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Feb;6:e2100169. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00169.
与标准放疗相比,调强放疗(IMRT)改善患者报告结局:NRG 肿瘤学 RTOG 1203 研究报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1685-1692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02381. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Are unsatisfactory outcomes after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer due to treatment-related immunosuppression?局部晚期非小细胞肺癌同步放化疗后疗效不佳是否与治疗相关的免疫抑制有关?
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Feb;143:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
5
Design and Development of a Person-Centered Patient Portal Using Participatory Stakeholder Co-Design.使用参与式利益相关者协同设计的以患者为中心的患者门户的设计与开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 11;21(2):e11371. doi: 10.2196/11371.
6
Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC): An International Collaboration to Analyse Normal Tissue Radiation Dose-Volume Response Relationships for Paediatric Cancer Patients.儿科正常组织器官临床效应(PENTEC):国际合作分析儿科癌症患者正常组织器官放射剂量-体积反应关系
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Mar;31(3):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
7
Incorporating Multiple Perspectives Into the Development of an Electronic Survivorship Platform for Head and Neck Cancer.将多种观点纳入头颈癌电子生存平台的开发过程中。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-15. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00105.
8
Introducing BREAST-Q Computerized Adaptive Testing: Short and Individualized Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment following Reconstructive Breast Surgery.引入 BREAST-Q 计算机化自适应测试:重建乳房手术后的简短和个体化患者报告结局评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar;143(3):679-684. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005314.
9
A Systematic Post-QUANTEC Review of Tolerance Doses for Late Toxicity After Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy.前列腺癌放射治疗后迟发性毒性的 QUAntEC 后系统评价耐受性剂量
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Dec 1;102(5):1514-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
10
The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005.将P值阈值降至0.005的提议。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 10;319(14):1429-1430. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1536.